Home Discord Chat
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > Nzoner's Game Room
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-22-2010, 12:10 PM   Topic Starter
Lzen Lzen is offline
Supporter
 
Lzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Jan Quadrant Vincent 16
Casino cash: $2170692
The 50 Riskiest Online Cities

Updated March 22, 2010

By Jeremy A. Kaplan
- FOXNews.com

By comparing cyberattacks, malware infections, and spam zombies with the prevalence of hotspots, online purchases and so on, Symantec has ascertained the 50 riskiest online cities.


By comparing the number of cyberattacks, malware infections, spam zombies and so on with the prevalence of wireless hotspots, frequency of online purchases, number of broadband connections, and so on, Symantec has ascertained the 50 riskiest online cities.
1. Seattle, WA
Seattle finished in the top spot by a wide margin, as it was the only city with top 10 scores in each of the study's categories. Seattle had the second-highest scores for risky behavior and Wi-Fi hotspots, the third-highest scores for Internet access and consumer expenditures and the sixth-highest score for cybercrimes per capita.
2. Boston, MA
Boston finished in second place overall due largely to its high levels of cybercrimes (5th place), risky behavior (4th place) and Wi-Fi availability (8th place). It also ranked in the top 25 percent of all cities in Internet access and consumer expenditures.

3. Washington, DC
Our nation's capital is also a capital of cybercrime, as it ranked third overall due to high scores in all of the categories. It ranked fourth in cybercrimes, fifth in Wi-Fi hotspots, eighth in consumer expenditures and Internet access and eleventh in risky behavior, as defined by the amount and type of Internet usage.
4. San Francisco, CA
It may come as a surprise that this high-tech hub ranked fourth overall, but San Francisco received the highest marks among all cities for risky behavior and Wi-Fi hotspots and the second highest marks for Internet access and consumer expenditures. It was only a relatively low number of cybercrimes that prevented San Francisco from claiming the top spot overall.
5. Raleigh, NC
The home of tech-center Research Triangle Park fifth place finish is the result of high marks in Internet access (7th), consumer expenditures (7th) and risky behavior (6th). Lower scores in cybercrimes (11th) and Wi-Fi hotspots (22nd) prevented Raleigh from finishing any higher in the overall rankings.
6. Atlanta, GA
Atlanta's sixth place finish was largely the result of its having the highest number of cybercrimes per capita in the United States. Atlanta also scored highly in Wi-Fi hotspots (3rd place). Lower scores in the other three categories kept it from moving closer to the top of the overall rankings.
7. Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis received fairly high marks across the board, finishing in the top ten in cybercrimes, risky behavior and Wi-Fi hotspots (9th place for each of these categories).
8. Denver, CO
Denver ranked eighth overall due largely to its high number of cybercrimes (7th). Denver ranks fifth in terms of spam zombies and bots per capita. Over 21 percent of its residents use the Internet at least five times per day, which is 28.7 percent above average, and 9.6 percent use the Internet away from home, which is 29.1 percent above average. Over 44 percent of Denver residents have broadband connections.
9. Austin, TX
Although Austin finished in the middle of the pack in terms of cybercrimes, its high scores in the other four categories resulted in a ninth place finish. Austin residents spend an annual average of $224.50 on hardware and $32.24 on software. Over 22 percent use the Internet at least five times per day, 36 percent above average. Nearly 9 percent use the Internet away from home, 37.1 percent above average, and 45.9 percent have broadband connections, 16.1 percent above average.
10. Portland, OR
Portland sneaks into the top 10 as a result of very high scores in risky behavior (5th) and Wi-Fi hotspots (4th). Portland has over 83 Wi-Fi hotspots per 100,000 residents, which is 266 percent greater than the average of the top 50 cities. Over 53 percent of Portland residents use e-mail, which is 20.1 percent above average. Online auctions are especially popular with Portlanders, as 8 percent of residents use them to buy things (20.7 percent above average).
11. Honolulu, HI
12. Charlotte, NC
13. Las Vegas, NV
14. San Diego, CA
15. Colorado Springs, CO
16. Sacramento, CA
17. Pittsburgh, PA
18. Oakland, CA
19. Nashville-Davidson, TN
20. San Jose, CA
21. Columbus, OH
22. Dallas, TX
23. Kansas City, MO
24. New York, NY
25. Indianapolis, IN
26. Albuquerque, NM
27. Miami, FL
28. Omaha, NE
29. Virginia Beach, VA
30. Los Angeles, CA
31. Cincinnati, OH
32. Houston, TX
33. St. Louis, MO
34. Phoenix, AZ
35. Chicago, IL
36. Baltimore, MD
37. Oklahoma City, OK
38. Philadelphia, PA
39. Jacksonville, FL
40. Tulsa, OK
41. San Antonio, TX
42. Milwaukee, WI
43. Cleveland, OH
44. Tucson, AZ
45. Long Beach, CA
46. Fort Worth, TX
47. Fresno, CA
48. Memphis, TN
49. El Paso, TX
50. Detroit, MI


http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/...online-cities/
Posts: 41,371
Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.Lzen is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 PM.


This is a test for a client's site.
Fort Worth Texas Process Servers
Covering Arlington, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie and surrounding communities.
Tarrant County, Texas and Johnson County, Texas.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.