I'm now more sure than ever that Geno's going #1 overall.

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by O.city

So I just quoted you saying that and you verified that yes, you would draft any of those guys at 1. Guys who would play RT, LG, C, #4 CB, #3 WR for us.

ANNNNNNNNNNNNNN


Wrong.

I didn't say, nor did you quote me saying I'd draft them AT 1.

I said I'd draft them. I didn't say where.

I specifically listed guys anywhere from the #8ish spot all the way up into the high 20's because I'm advocating trading out more than anything, and I might have even said that in this thread already.

Pay more attention.

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by KC native

How dare you question the PhD mechanic! Don't you know that all his hours for his ASE cert make him an expert in everything?

Somebody's butthurt.

Originally Posted by O.city

And with the universal ignore function, he no longer exists on my computer.

Untrue. You'll see the name and "view post" everywhere.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Exoter175

I said I'd draft them. I didn't say where.

YOU'RE SAYING THE CHIEFS SHOULD ADDRESS SOME OF THEIR NEEDS AT SOME POINT IN THEIR DRAFT?

OH MY ****ING GOD WHY DIDN'T WE THINK OF THIS BEFORE?

[Exoter175]

Originally Posted by SNR

YOU'RE SAYING THE CHIEFS SHOULD ADDRESS SOME OF THEIR NEEDS AT SOME POINT IN THEIR DRAFT?

OH MY ****ING GOD WHY DIDN'T WE THINK OF THIS BEFORE?

Because we were too busy thinking about what we could do with that 1.1 selecting a QB, which we've never done.