Chiefs Disappointed in McCluster - Page 41

Hammock Parties · 10-10-2010, 08:41 PM

Bla bla bla, he's a playmaker, he has two touchdowns already, whatever.

He has seven catches for 93 yards. 1/3 of that yardage came on one play. At least two of those are screen passes I believe.

That ****ing sucks.

This guy needs to be a threat as a WIDE RECEIVER. He hasnt made a single play down the field. I'm not even talking 20 yards. How about 10? How about coming off the line, putting your foot in the ground, getting open and giving Cassel a target?

I'm not willing to accept the idea that Cassel is so god awful he makes all our wide receivers look terrible.

McCluster hasn't done shit yet. And he was utter garbage in Indy.

Don't buy any of his ****ing t-shirts.

jd1020 · 10-11-2011, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

Who do you think is going to give up more yards? A team with an offense that's always playing in close games or a team with an offense that builds big leads so that other teams have to throw and play catch-up?

Making the opposing teams offense 1 dimensional is the best possible thing you can do. Ignorant argument.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-11-2011, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

You mean another not great defense backed by a great offense? I'll let you know what I find out after I ask.

Wow. You're even more ****ing reeruned than I thought if you think the Packers and Saints are even remotely comparable on defense.

Enjoy huffing paint, or whatever the **** you're doing to damage your brain.

jd1020 · 10-11-2011, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Wow. You're even more ****ing reeruned than I thought if you think the Packers and Saints are even remotely comparable on defense.

Enjoy huffing paint, or whatever the **** you're doing to damage your brain.

When did I ever compare them? You reeruned?

**DaKCMan AP** · 10-11-2011, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Making the opposing teams offense 1 dimensional is the best possible thing you can do. Ignorant argument.

You're quickly becoming one of the dumbest posters on CP and that's not an easy task.

You can't have it both ways. Winning the field position battle means there are more yards available for the other team to gain. What matters in the NFL are points and turnovers. The Packers are ranked near the top of the league in both. Meaningless yards are just that - meaningless.

jd1020 · 10-11-2011, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

You're quickly becoming one of the dumbest posters on CP and that's not an easy task.

You can't have it both ways. Winning the field position battle means there are more yards available for the other team to gain. What matters in the NFL are points and turnovers. The Packers are ranked near the top of the league in both. Meaningless yards are just that - meaningless.

Wtf are you talking about both ways?

**DaKCMan AP** · 10-11-2011, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Wtf are you talking about both ways?

The Packers have very good defensive scoring numbers. You argue that's only because they have an offense that wins the field position battle.

You also say their D is no good because they're ranked #21 in total yards allowed. It can be argued that's also because they have an offense that wins the field position battle.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-11-2011, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

The Packers have very good defensive scoring numbers. You argue that's only because they have an offense that wins the field position battle.

You also say their D is no good because they're ranked #21 in total yards allowed. It can be argued that's also because they have an offense that wins the field position battle.

Meanwhile, the Saints have piss-poor defensive scoring numbers, giving up 26 a game, IIRC, and they have an offense that wins the field position battle as well.

But in this clown's eyes, both are "bad" defenses.

Can't tell if he's trolling or genuinely this devoid of common sense and football IQ.

jd1020 · 10-11-2011, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

The Packers have very good defensive scoring numbers. You argue that's only because they have an offense that wins the field position battle.

You also say their D is no good because they're ranked #21 in total yards allowed. It can be argued that's also because they have an offense that wins the field position battle.

And I would point those people to San Diego's numbers last year.

**the Talking Can** · 10-11-2011, 12:50 PM

we drafted a clown car with the 36th pick in the draft....

marinate on that

Chief Faithful · 10-11-2011, 01:25 PM

I'm not disappointed in McCluster. He is a young ascending player with a lot of explosive talent. He is not much different than Charles was at this point in his NFL career. I really like the offensive flexibility and options he represents. I suspect he will be used sparingly against teams with a strong pass rush, like Indy, until that area of his game improves.

**the Talking Can** · 10-11-2011, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Faithful

I'm not disappointed in McCluster. He is a young ascending player with a lot of explosive talent. He is not much different than Charles was at this point in his NFL career. I really like the offensive flexibility and options he represents. I suspect he will be used sparingly against teams with a strong pass rush, like Indy, until that area of his game improves.

as parody, that post is awesome

Hammock Parties · 10-11-2011, 01:37 PM

He is good at exploding in our face.

Chief Faithful · 10-11-2011, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

as parody, that post is awesome

Not sure I understand, are you suggesting parody as in I'm mocking the original post?

It is tough for me to understand because I really do believe McCluster is going to be a big contributor not a bust. The real question I can't answer, yet, was he worth an early second round pick? I still believe he will be considered good value in the near future. The main thing that has to improve is his pass blocking.

Chief Faithful · 10-11-2011, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

He is good at exploding in our face.

You would know

Hammock Parties · 10-11-2011, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Faithful

He is not much different than Charles was at this point in his NFL career.

Charles had 1,400 yards from scrimmage and 8 TD his second year.

McCluster is being upstaged by Jack Battle right now.

10-10-2010, 08:41 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4710478	Disappointed in McCluster Bla bla bla, he's a playmaker, he has two touchdowns already, whatever. He has seven catches for 93 yards. 1/3 of that yardage came on one play. At least two of those are screen passes I believe. That **ing sucks. This guy needs to be a threat as a WIDE RECEIVER. He hasnt made a single play down the field. I'm not even talking 20 yards. How about 10? How about coming off the line, putting your foot in the ground, getting open and giving Cassel a target? I'm not willing to accept the idea that Cassel is so god awful he makes all our wide receivers look terrible. McCluster hasn't done shit yet. And he was utter garbage in Indy. Don't buy any of his **ing t-shirts.
Posts: 277,902

10-11-2011, 12:50 PM	#609
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $10022208	we drafted a clown car with the 36th pick in the draft.... marinate on that __________________ Clark Hunt: "Thank god for the Dominican pool boy"
Posts: 51,585

10-11-2011, 01:25 PM	#610
Chief Faithful Predicting Chiefs Victory Join Date: Sep 2001 Casino cash: $9966500	I'm not disappointed in McCluster. He is a young ascending player with a lot of explosive talent. He is not much different than Charles was at this point in his NFL career. I really like the offensive flexibility and options he represents. I suspect he will be used sparingly against teams with a strong pass rush, like Indy, until that area of his game improves.
Posts: 4,315

10-11-2011, 01:37 PM	#612
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4710478	He is good at exploding in our face. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 277,902