Planet Nibiru almost here and explanation of coming zombie apocolypse

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by FAX

You said it's been stable for millions of years. But that doesn't mean that it always will be (1).

Still can't read you ****ing reerun?

Try going back again.

Jesus christ you are one god damn stupid ****ing idiot...

1) http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman

2)http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...-t48uU0#t=154s

(Specifically here since your brain is obviously too decayed to pay attention for more than a few seconds: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...-t48uU0#t=184s )


Now kindly go **** off and talk to someone who is as dumb as yourself, and stop wasting my time.

[Third Eye]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

Still can't read you ****ing reerun?

Try going back again.

Jesus christ you are one god damn stupid ****ing idiot...

1) http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman

2)http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...-t48uU0#t=154s

(Specifically here since your brain is obviously too decayed to pay attention for more than a few seconds: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...-t48uU0#t=184s )


Now kindly go **** off and talk to someone who is as dumb as yourself, and stop wasting my time.

One of life's simpler pleasures: watching those of limited intelligence insult the intellect of others.

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by Third Eye

One of life's simpler pleasures: watching those of limited intelligence insult the intellect of others.

So did you just join in on the cosmic circle jerk, O superior hypocrite?



Or do you just think you are smarter than others while not actually realizing how ****ing lame you are?

[Third Eye]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

So did you just join in on the cosmic circle jerk, O superior hypocrite?



Or do you just think you are smarter than others while not actually realizing how ****ing lame you are?

I am not making any claims as to my intellectual surpluses nor my deficits, but yours have been displayed here many times.

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by Third Eye

I am not making any claims as to my intellectual surpluses nor my deficits, but yours have been displayed here many times.

Now you are a liar as well....In your last post you claim you are watching others of 'limited' intelligence, therefore implying yours is not.

Why don't you go back to my original post, the one which Mr Fax attacked , and I am defending...and tell me what is incorrect?

Why do you simply come into the thread, make an Ad Homenem attack, and then leave ( a reeruned "hit it and quit it")? Does this satisfy your ego, like a young woman's vagina...which has never experienced a true deep dicking? Are you just a simple troll enjoying the 'simple pleasures' of trolling? Or do you just enjoy being an imbecile?

Did you even read the post in question that your boyfriend Fax attacked me for?

[Easy 6]

Sheesh, Pawn, whats eating you these days... if you consider the FAX post an attack, then something has got you waaay too sensitive lately.

All he did was ask some questions and present a different idea... the name calling started with you, my friend.

Is the stress of a new family getting to you or what? go hold your son for an hour or so and take some deep breaths.

Chill Pill 500mg - stat

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by scott free

Sheesh, Pawn, whats eating you these days... if you consider the FAX post an attack, then something has got you waaay too sensitive lately.

All he did was ask some questions and present a different idea... the name calling started with you, my friend.

Is the stress of a new family getting to you or what? go hold your son for an hour or so and take some deep breaths.

Chill Pill 500mg - stat

Well , it was rude and condescending ("I urge you to revise / re-read..blah blah") when it was CLEAR the dude never even made an attempt to actually read what I wrote. I consider that an attack, as the argument was directed at me rather than what I wrote. Go back and read it again, and pretend you were the one being "urged" to re-write their statement.

He did NOT merely present a different idea, as you are suggesting. As a matter of fact he didn't present any other idea than what I presented in my 1st post.

[Crush]

Originally Posted by scott free

Sheesh, Pawn, whats eating you these days... if you consider the FAX post an attack, then something has got you waaay too sensitive lately.

All he did was ask some questions and present a different idea... the name calling started with you, my friend.

Is the stress of a new family getting to you or what? go hold your son for an hour or so and take some deep breaths.

Chill Pill 500mg - stat

He still has Cassel's dick in his ass.

[Third Eye]

Originally Posted by Pawnmower

Now you are a liar as well....In your last post you claim you are watching others of 'limited' intelligence, therefore implying yours is not.

Why don't you go back to my original post, the one which Mr Fax attacked , and I am defending...and tell me what is incorrect?

Why do you simply come into the thread, make an Ad Homenem attack, and then leave ( a reeruned "hit it and quit it")? Does this satisfy your ego, like a young woman's vagina...which has never experienced a true deep dicking? Are you just a simple troll enjoying the 'simple pleasures' of trolling? Or do you just enjoy being an imbecile?

Did you even read the post in question that your boyfriend Fax attacked me for?

1. If you want to read that implication in what I wrote, then that reflects upon you. Semantically, the implication is not there.

2. Ad Hominem, with an "i". Additionally, considering:

take your head out of your ass b4 you comment

Since you are obviously a moron

Perhaps if you weren't so busy trying to portray some character , you could spend that energy actually reading what people write as opposed to just babbling like a complete idiot.

It is amusing that you would make that claim.

3. Sorry, I'm busy writing a paper, I can't be here to respond right away. Do you just sit around waiting for people to respond to you so you can immediately respond to them? Forgive me, I thought the entire point of a message board was so that you could post and respond at your convenience, not the convenience of others.

4. If you seriously consider what he initially wrote to you to be an attack, then I really feel sorry for you. I mean that sincerely, not as a joke. It must make social interaction very difficult.

5. The idea that the probability of a rogue object entering our solar system is equal to zero is simply not defensible, especially without a time bound. In the next thousand years, yeah, virtually zero. Not actually zero, but practically zero. However, as we consider a larger bound, that probability grows. The fact that our solar system has existed in a virtual equilibrium for well over a million years has no bearing on what is happening outside of our system.

[Ming the Merciless]

Originally Posted by Third Eye

1. If you want to read that implication in what I wrote, then that reflects upon you. Semantically, the implication is not there.

Ad Hominem, with an "i"ohhh spelling mistake , thanks, hero


The idea that the probability of a rogue object entering our solar system is equal to zero is simply not defensible, .

Awesome, the same strawman that the other guy used.....I wasn't defending that position! (if you read my 1st post youll see i specifically state events can occur like super novae etc...) So I agree with this.......I was speaking in terms of now and the near future, in our solar system.... just as you were in your previous post. (our lifetime / doomsday scenario 2012 etc)

So other than spelling, you really havent added much insight to this issue. But hey, the world needs spelling monitors so I am sure when you get out of school you'll get a great job stamping papers or correcting spelling on govt forms.