|
|
01-14-2012, 09:23 PM | #1 |
WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $2905085
|
I posted in the game thread that they scored too soon. No NFL player is ever going to lay down in that situation, but if they had, they would probably have won.
|
Posts: 119,525
|
01-14-2012, 09:35 PM | #2 |
Guest
Casino cash: $
|
|
Posts: n/a
|
01-14-2012, 09:42 PM | #3 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
Casino cash: $3794454
|
|
Posts: 66,914
|
01-14-2012, 09:45 PM | #4 |
Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Casino cash: $5243539
|
|
Posts: 12,855
|
01-14-2012, 09:49 PM | #5 |
Court Jester
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orlando
Casino cash: $2862400
|
|
Posts: 19,770
|
01-14-2012, 09:52 PM | #6 |
Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Casino cash: $5243539
|
That is a completely different scenario then.
There is absolutely no way that Graham should have laid down before scoring. THEY WERE LOSING THE GAME! Touchdowns aren't guaranteed by any means, and the 49ers have one of the top defenses in the NFL. If he lays down and they don't score, that is the worst decision in NFL history. |
Posts: 12,855
|
01-14-2012, 09:47 PM | #7 |
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scott City KS
Casino cash: $2094734
|
|
Posts: 56,891
|
01-14-2012, 09:46 PM | #8 |
WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $2905085
|
It's sort of like a team pinned at their goal line deliberately taking a safety late in a game. The 2 points don't matter, are better than risking a fumble/block in the endzone, and the distance gained by the free kick all but guarantees victory. I've only seen that once, too. But it was a smart play.
|
Posts: 119,525
|
|
|