Chiefs *****IF***** Winston signs in KC.

Direckshun · 10:48 AM

You've got three options.

(a.) Do everything you can to turn your first-rounder this year into a first-rounder in 2013.

Next year's QB crop is strong, and the Chiefs could use maximum flexibility to move around if they see a guy they want.

(b.) Draft DeCastro, and create the best OL in the NFL.

Albert
DeCastro
Hudson
Asamoah
Winston

(c.) Assuming you can't trade down, ignore the shitty value at guard and push for a third passrusher like Nick Perry. The Chiefs can't expect Houston and Hali to remain healthy for all future seasons. They need a no-drop-off backup to come in and keep them in playoff or Super Bowl contention.

Drafting Perry allows him to suck for a year behind Hali/Houston while we develop him. You can never have too many passrushers. Check out how stacked this sub-package is:

Sofa King · 03-16-2012, 10:39 AM

Hey you ****er. I read this thread title thinking we signed him.

We didn't need another ****ing thread you selfish jerk.

Wait til we sign him for this shit.

Epic Fail 007 · 03-16-2012, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sofa King

Hey you ****er. I read this thread title thinking we signed him.

We didn't need another ****ing thread you selfish jerk.

Wait til we sign him for this shit.

There are reports we are going to sign him today. Plans are to make him one of the highest paid rts.

Sofa King · 03-16-2012, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eric007

There are reports we are going to sign him today. Plans are to make him one of the highest paid rts.

I know. I read that in the 15+ page thread dedicated to Winston.

I find it hilarious that a thread about a ****ing RT has over 1,400 replies.

Mr_Tomahawk · 03-16-2012, 10:40 AM

Get tired of people using the "next years QB class is stronger" excuse every year.

CoMoChief · 03-16-2012, 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

Get tired of people using the "next years QB class is stronger" excuse every year.

Well it is....

**RealSNR** · 03-16-2012, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

Well it is....

That's what they say every year.

It never is.

saphojunkie · 03-16-2012, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

That's what they say every year.

It never is.

There were four QB largely considered first round guys.

Luck, RG3, Landry Jones, and Barkley.

Jones and Barkley are back in the water. It immediately makes next year's QB class stronger. There will be at least two QB worthy of top five picks, and possibly more.

Add to that this reality:

This year's teams that needed a QB:

Colts, Chiefs, Browns, Dolphins, Seahawks, Redskins.

This year's answers to those needs:

Colts: Luck
Chiefs: nothing
Browns: Flynn/Tannehill
Dolphins: Flynn/Tannehill
Seahawks: nothing
Redskins: RG3

That means that next year, it will be the Chiefs and the Seahawks with the obvious needs at quarterback, a need SO obvious we will take one in the first round.

Two teams with need vs. 3 or more top QB prospects? I'll take that over four teams fighting for 2 guys.

Oh, and if Tennessee gets Manning, that might shift Locker out. And I think a trade back to Washington State makes a LOT of sense...

**the Talking Can** · 03-16-2012, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie

There were four QB largely considered first round guys.

Luck, RG3, Landry Jones, and Barkley.

Jones and Barkley are back in the water. It immediately makes next year's QB class stronger. There will be at least two QB worthy of top five picks, and possibly more.

Add to that this reality:

This year's teams that needed a QB:

Colts, Chiefs, Browns, Dolphins, Seahawks, Redskins.

This year's answers to those needs:

Colts: Luck
Chiefs: nothing
Browns: Flynn/Tannehill
Dolphins: Flynn/Tannehill
Seahawks: nothing
Redskins: RG3

That means that next year, it will be the Chiefs and the Seahawks with the obvious needs at quarterback, a need SO obvious we will take one in the first round.

Two teams with need vs. 3 or more top QB prospects? I'll take that over four teams fighting for 2 guys.

Oh, and if Tennessee gets Manning, that might shift Locker out. And I think a trade back to Washington State makes a LOT of sense...

you have no idea how many teams will be hot for a QB...but there will be several as there always is...injuries, retirements, new coaches, new gms...priorities change

**ChiefGator** · 03-16-2012, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

Get tired of people using the "next years QB class is stronger" excuse every year.

This... no doubt.

Rooster · 03-16-2012, 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

Get tired of people using the "next years QB class is stronger" excuse every year.

It's a process. A forty year process but a process none the less.

**bevischief** · 03-16-2012, 10:41 AM

I agree with both the 2 opening posts. Especially the 2nd one

.

Micjones · 03-16-2012, 10:42 AM

Tannehill or trade back.

whoman69 · 03-16-2012, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones

Tannehill or trade back.

Not worth it

ChiefMojo · 03-16-2012, 10:44 AM

Tannehill isn't going to be there at #11. Whomever between Cleveland, Seattle or Miami will select him first.

03-16-2012, 10:38 AM	Topic Starter
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4343447	***IF*** Winston signs in KC. You've got three options. (a.) Do everything you can to turn your first-rounder this year into a first-rounder in 2013. Next year's QB crop is strong, and the Chiefs could use maximum flexibility to move around if they see a guy they want. (b.) Draft DeCastro, and create the best OL in the NFL. Albert DeCastro Hudson Asamoah Winston (c.) Assuming you can't trade down, ignore the shitty value at guard and push for a third passrusher like Nick Perry. The Chiefs can't expect Houston and Hali to remain healthy for all future seasons. They need a no-drop-off backup to come in and keep them in playoff or Super Bowl contention. Drafting Perry allows him to suck for a year behind Hali/Houston while we develop him. You can never have too many passrushers. Check out how stacked this sub-package is: Last edited by Direckshun; 03-16-2012 at 10:48 AM..
Posts: 59,277

03-16-2012, 10:39 AM	#2
Sofa King Hello Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: South Dakota Casino cash: $1042096 VARSITY	Hey you **er. I read this thread title thinking we signed him. We didn't need another **ing thread you selfish jerk. Wait til we sign him for this shit.
Posts: 23,224

03-16-2012, 10:40 AM	#5
Mr_Tomahawk Prestige Worldwide Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Spring Hill, KS Casino cash: $3010526	Get tired of people using the "next years QB class is stronger" excuse every year. __________________ Adopt-A-Chief: John Dorsey
Posts: 18,392

03-16-2012, 10:41 AM	#12
bevischief .... Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Somewhere Kansas Casino cash: $8659352 VARSITY	I agree with both the 2 opening posts. Especially the 2nd one .
Posts: 27,731

03-16-2012, 10:42 AM	#13
Micjones Whose house? Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $10005180	Tannehill or trade back. __________________ It's like when I'm right I'm right, when I'm wrong I could been right, so I'm still right cause I coulda been wrong.
Posts: 15,344

03-16-2012, 10:44 AM	#15
ChiefMojo Happy, Happy, Happy!!! Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $10004935	Tannehill isn't going to be there at #11. Whomever between Cleveland, Seattle or Miami will select him first.
Posts: 2,283