Chiefs RBs

Buzzbait · 10-14-2000, 04:08 PM

I believe the Chiefs will keep 4 RB's for next year(includung drafting one) because Moreau is looking more of a Kimble Anders than a Stephen Davis look for Frank to be converted to FB Tony Richerson will be relegated back to his blocking back/special teams duties Cloud will be a spot man for the 1st round draft pick (Lamont Jordan,Travis Henry, or Rudi Johnson)

Guys we are very close we can do it behinf this O-line but we need to find the right back running behind it.

Mike · 10-14-2000, 04:11 PM

I have to respectfully disagree. When have the Chiefs ever kept that few of backs? Even IF we draft a RB in the 1st round (hopefully) we'll still keep a stable, IMO. 5 at the least. I'd keep Moreau at HB, T-Rich at FB, with Cloud backing our #1. But I'd pick up another backup FB (it will probably just be a re-sign of Bennett). Anders won't be here (cap).

Buzzbait · 10-14-2000, 04:21 PM

I'll have to disagree with you their also because Gun stated he wanted a feature RB
and this Draft is so strong at RB position I think the Chiefs will go for the backs I stated the carries would go 1st rounder/Moreau/Cloud. And another reason is you want dump the dead weight and leave that one position open for a WR spot since the Chiefs are converting Ricks to a TE.

[This message has been edited by ChiefPriority (edited 10-14-2000).]

Buzzbait · 10-14-2000, 04:36 PM

Wait a minute I forgot about Dante Hall Graeme their's your 5 backs. [img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/wink.gif[/img]

Mike · 10-14-2000, 04:36 PM

Where did you hear anything about ricks being converted to TE? And even if he were to be, we sure as hell wouldn't be keeping [b]5[/b] TEs, so we wouldn't need to make room. Unless you have information that I don't, I don't believe Ricks is going to be moved from WR. And are you forgetting to figure in Hall? We WILL keep more than 4 RBs.

Buzzbait · 10-14-2000, 04:39 PM

The Sporting News Chiefs page

Buzzbait · 10-14-2000, 04:42 PM

I know I forgot about Dante Hall the guy's so small he's easy forget. [img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/biggrin.gif[/img]

Mike · 10-14-2000, 04:54 PM

[i]The signing of free agent Mikhael Ricks signals the Chiefs' desire to add big, strong receivers. Ricks, 6-5, 237 pounds, can create matchup problems for smaller defensive backs, especially in the red zone, and the Chiefs are thinking about using him in a tight end role, too.[/i]

It hardly says they [b]ARE[/b] moving him to TE, just that they're [b]thinking[/b] of using him there [b]too[/b]. Note the first sentence: Mikhael Ricks signals the Chiefs' desire to add big, strong [b]receivers[/b].

[This message has been edited by G_Man (edited 10-14-2000).]

[This message has been edited by G_Man (edited 10-14-2000).]

Buzzbait · 10-14-2000, 06:23 PM

And I'm reading between the lines and I come to the conclusion they'll convert him to TE.Therefore they'll use him just like how they use Gonzalez.(they'll line him up at TE or slot reciever positions)

[This message has been edited by ChiefPriority (edited 10-14-2000).]

Mike · 10-14-2000, 07:57 PM

Like I said before though, IF (and I don't think they will) they DO convert him to full-time TE, it will be at the expense of Drayton or Dunn next year. We WON'T keep 5 TEs.

Buzzbait · 10-14-2000, 11:51 PM

Again he will have a Tony Gonzalez role mark it down.( it will happen)

10-15-2000, 07:02 AM

Apparently, Bob Dole is the only one who is pleased with Cloud's improvement so far this season.

Bob Dole has been screaming for 2 back sets that don't give away the offense's plan of attack since Okoye. Put T Tich at FB and Cloud at HB and run different plays out of the same formation. T Rich can hammer on Grunny's buttcheeks and Cloud can take the corner. Let the guys get some carries and get into a groove with the O-line.

Amazing what happens when everyone on defense (and 70,000 plus fans and the entire TV audience) doesn't know who is getting the ball and where they are headed...

shakesthecat · 10-15-2000, 07:56 AM

I think the Chiefs will probably go with best player available type, primarily looking at RB, LB, and OL or DL. I think they will resign Grunny for 3 more years, centers have a tendency to play longer than other OL, we need to keep Will Shields, but if a top Guard were available, then it might be him. It looks more and more, like we will be in the upper third of the draft again. I hope we can find another Morris, with the pick.

ddpatterson · 10-15-2000, 08:29 AM

The milkman agrees with Bob Dole. With the emergence of the Chiefs' air attack, T-Rich/Cloud can be an effective 1-2 punch on the ground, and gives the Chiefs a number of options that can keep the defenses guessing.

------------------

[b]Red Eyes[/b]
[i]Chinn Up.[/i]

[b]The [i]SitCom[/i] must die!!</B>

scooter · 10-15-2000, 10:36 AM

Perhaps I'm in the minority but I don't view RB as a big draft day need. Cloud has proven that when he gets the ball in space that he's a very dangerous back. Moreau will take the Bennett swingman role. Hall can give you the scatback and Rich is the unquestioned FB.

As I've repeatedly said, give Cloud 20 carries and the RB question will be over.

I still view WR as a draft need. We still don't have our deep burner. We have a pair of Irvings but no Harper.

10-14-2000, 04:11 PM	#2
Mike Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Austin Casino cash: $10004900	I have to respectfully disagree. When have the Chiefs ever kept that few of backs? Even IF we draft a RB in the 1st round (hopefully) we'll still keep a stable, IMO. 5 at the least. I'd keep Moreau at HB, T-Rich at FB, with Cloud backing our #1. But I'd pick up another backup FB (it will probably just be a re-sign of Bennett). Anders won't be here (cap).
Posts: 716

10-14-2000, 04:21 PM	#3
Buzzbait Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	I'll have to disagree with you their also because Gun stated he wanted a feature RB and this Draft is so strong at RB position I think the Chiefs will go for the backs I stated the carries would go 1st rounder/Moreau/Cloud. And another reason is you want dump the dead weight and leave that one position open for a WR spot since the Chiefs are converting Ricks to a TE. [This message has been edited by ChiefPriority (edited 10-14-2000).]
Posts: 1,015

10-14-2000, 04:36 PM	#4
Buzzbait Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Wait a minute I forgot about Dante Hall Graeme their's your 5 backs. [img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/wink.gif[/img]
Posts: 1,015

10-14-2000, 04:36 PM	#5
Mike Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Austin Casino cash: $10004900	Where did you hear anything about ricks being converted to TE? And even if he were to be, we sure as hell wouldn't be keeping [b]5[/b] TEs, so we wouldn't need to make room. Unless you have information that I don't, I don't believe Ricks is going to be moved from WR. And are you forgetting to figure in Hall? We WILL keep more than 4 RBs.
Posts: 716

10-14-2000, 04:39 PM	#6
Buzzbait Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	The Sporting News Chiefs page
Posts: 1,015

10-14-2000, 04:08 PM
Buzzbait Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	I believe the Chiefs will keep 4 RB's for next year(includung drafting one) because Moreau is looking more of a Kimble Anders than a Stephen Davis look for Frank to be converted to FB Tony Richerson will be relegated back to his blocking back/special teams duties Cloud will be a spot man for the 1st round draft pick (Lamont Jordan,Travis Henry, or Rudi Johnson) Guys we are very close we can do it behinf this O-line but we need to find the right back running behind it.
Posts: 1,015

10-14-2000, 04:42 PM	#7
Buzzbait Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	I know I forgot about Dante Hall the guy's so small he's easy forget. [img]http://www.ChiefsPlanet.com/ubb/biggrin.gif[/img]
Posts: 1,015

10-14-2000, 04:54 PM	#8
Mike Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Austin Casino cash: $10004900	[i]The signing of free agent Mikhael Ricks signals the Chiefs' desire to add big, strong receivers. Ricks, 6-5, 237 pounds, can create matchup problems for smaller defensive backs, especially in the red zone, and the Chiefs are thinking about using him in a tight end role, too.[/i] It hardly says they [b]ARE[/b] moving him to TE, just that they're [b]thinking[/b] of using him there [b]too[/b]. Note the first sentence: Mikhael Ricks signals the Chiefs' desire to add big, strong [b]receivers[/b]. [This message has been edited by G_Man (edited 10-14-2000).] [This message has been edited by G_Man (edited 10-14-2000).]
Posts: 716

10-14-2000, 06:23 PM	#9
Buzzbait Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	And I'm reading between the lines and I come to the conclusion they'll convert him to TE.Therefore they'll use him just like how they use Gonzalez.(they'll line him up at TE or slot reciever positions) [This message has been edited by ChiefPriority (edited 10-14-2000).]
Posts: 1,015

10-14-2000, 07:57 PM	#10
Mike Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Austin Casino cash: $10004900	Like I said before though, IF (and I don't think they will) they DO convert him to full-time TE, it will be at the expense of Drayton or Dunn next year. We WON'T keep 5 TEs.
Posts: 716

10-14-2000, 11:51 PM	#11
Buzzbait Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Again he will have a Tony Gonzalez role mark it down.( it will happen)
Posts: 1,015

10-15-2000, 07:02 AM	#12
htismaqe Guest Casino cash: $	Apparently, Bob Dole is the only one who is pleased with Cloud's improvement so far this season. Bob Dole has been screaming for 2 back sets that don't give away the offense's plan of attack since Okoye. Put T Tich at FB and Cloud at HB and run different plays out of the same formation. T Rich can hammer on Grunny's buttcheeks and Cloud can take the corner. Let the guys get some carries and get into a groove with the O-line. Amazing what happens when everyone on defense (and 70,000 plus fans and the entire TV audience) doesn't know who is getting the ball and where they are headed...
Posts: n/a

10-15-2000, 07:56 AM	#13
shakesthecat Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: IA Casino cash: $4303833	I think the Chiefs will probably go with best player available type, primarily looking at RB, LB, and OL or DL. I think they will resign Grunny for 3 more years, centers have a tendency to play longer than other OL, we need to keep Will Shields, but if a top Guard were available, then it might be him. It looks more and more, like we will be in the upper third of the draft again. I hope we can find another Morris, with the pick.
Posts: 3,353

10-15-2000, 08:29 AM	#14
ddpatterson Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	The milkman agrees with Bob Dole. With the emergence of the Chiefs' air attack, T-Rich/Cloud can be an effective 1-2 punch on the ground, and gives the Chiefs a number of options that can keep the defenses guessing. ------------------ [b]Red Eyes[/b] [i]Chinn Up.[/i] [b]The [i]SitCom[/i] must die!!</B>
Posts: 943

10-15-2000, 10:36 AM	#15
scooter Starter Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $9994900	Perhaps I'm in the minority but I don't view RB as a big draft day need. Cloud has proven that when he gets the ball in space that he's a very dangerous back. Moreau will take the Bennett swingman role. Hall can give you the scatback and Rich is the unquestioned FB. As I've repeatedly said, give Cloud 20 carries and the RB question will be over. I still view WR as a draft need. We still don't have our deep burner. We have a pair of Irvings but no Harper.
Posts: 472