Chiefs Teicher:On first play at camp, Chiefs show their new look - Page 16

Hammock Parties · 07-27-2013, 05:41 PM

I don't think it's a word, but it should be.

**BossChief** · 07-27-2013, 05:45 PM

It's a discipline and coaching thing with Romo as far as his decision making goes.

The guy has had some really really good years throwing that included few mistakes.
4500 yards 26tds 9ints
4200 yards 31tds 10 ints

I just think that certain players have all the tools, but get matchup up with lesser coaches that don't know how to get that skill to equate to wins and losses and that is how I sees Romo.

If JJ brings in a coach next year that can keep Romo in check, that team can instantly be a contender.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 07-27-2013, 05:46 PM

He played a hell of a game against NE in 2009, but ended up losing anyway.

**BossChief** · 07-27-2013, 05:52 PM

Romo has to constantly try to win shootouts and has put the team on his back for years now.

Id also like to believe that a change of scenery would do him well in helping to limit his distractions.

Chiefs Pantalones · 07-27-2013, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

Romo has to constantly try to win shootouts and has put the team on his back for years now.

Id also like to believe that a change of scenery would do him well in helping to limit his distractions.

I think a change of scenery would do well for Romo as well. But I'm not gonna give him the excuse you just did. How many franchise QBs do we see year in and out that put their teams on their backs and lead them to victory? Only about 5, yes, but let's just call Romo what he is...a second tier QB that isn't big time...yet.

**Mav** · 07-27-2013, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones

I think a change of scenery would do well for Romo as well. But I'm not gonna give him the excuse you just did. How many franchise QBs do we see year in and out that put their teams on their backs and lead them to victory? Only about 5, yes, but let's just call Romo what he is...a second tier QB that isn't big time...yet.

He puts up great stats. But his turnovers and propensity to lose any game that he has to win, and it usually has to do with a bone headed turnover that end up costing them. Hes a great fantasy qb. just not sure how big time of a qb he is.

Chiefs Pantalones · 07-27-2013, 05:55 PM

Romo is 1-5 in must win games to either get to the playoffs or win in the playoffs. The one win coming in the 09 playoffs. The other five times he has shit the bed. Of all the QBs CP rags on he is deserving of it, IMO.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 07-27-2013, 06:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones

Romo is 1-5 in must win games to either get to the playoffs or win in the playoffs. The one win coming in the 09 playoffs. The other five times he has shit the bed. Of all the QBs CP rags on he is deserving of it, IMO.

He's the only reason they even get to a must-win situation.

Chiefs Pantalones · 07-27-2013, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

He's the only reason they even get to a must-win situation.

He's also a big part of the reason they go home. The best game I've seen him play was that 09 playoff game. I have to watch them a lot sadly due to my Cowboys fan devil wife. Lol

Hammock Parties · 07-27-2013, 06:42 PM

Look at Alex Smith doing nothing for an entire quarter AND overtime while Tony Romo wins the damn game.

Alex Smith had three chances to win the game here and did absolutely nothing but get sacked and fart around.

He gave Romo enough chances and then BOOM, 77-yard killshot.

keg in kc · 07-27-2013, 07:02 PM

Nah, they'd install the read-option. That's definitely not a gimmick that the league will figure out shortly.

Coogs · 07-27-2013, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

Nah, they'd install the read-option. That's definitely not a gimmick that the league will figure out shortly.

I can't remember where I read this, so I can not link it, but the next big thing to come of of the read-option is supposed to be the play action pass. I could see where that could be a good thing for us with Charles as the RB.

keg in kc · 07-27-2013, 07:12 PM

I remember reading around superbowl time how part of the reason SF kept Kaep on the field is because ASmith couldn't effectively run the read-option, that he allowed them to do things they couldn't do with Smith under center. And then in march the reason we picked him up is because he's so effective with the WCO. And now we're installing the read-option. It's so bizarre how all these stories are going. It's like every story contradicts the last.

**Mav** · 07-27-2013, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

I remember reading around superbowl time how part of the reason SF kept Kaep on the field is because ASmith couldn't effectively run the read-option, that he allowed them to do things they couldn't do with Smith under center. And then in march the reason we picked him up is because he's so effective with the WCO. And now we're installing the read-option. It's so bizarre how all these stories are going. It's like every story contradicts the last.

That's not the case. They didn't even install the Read option for Kaep, until after the Saints game. Kaep fumbled 4 snaps that he took under center in that game. That's when they did the read option.

**notorious** · 07-27-2013, 08:17 PM

We had shit QBs and the most horrifically reeruned offensive staff in football history last year.

I plan on seeing vast improvement from McCluster and other players like him.

07-27-2013, 05:41 PM	#1
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4500478	I don't think it's a word, but it should be. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 278,505

07-27-2013, 05:45 PM	#2
BossChief SuperBowl or bust Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: BF Iowa Casino cash: $1684088	It's a discipline and coaching thing with Romo as far as his decision making goes. The guy has had some really really good years throwing that included few mistakes. 4500 yards 26tds 9ints 4200 yards 31tds 10 ints I just think that certain players have all the tools, but get matchup up with lesser coaches that don't know how to get that skill to equate to wins and losses and that is how I sees Romo. If JJ brings in a coach next year that can keep Romo in check, that team can instantly be a contender. __________________ Dreams do come true... http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...postcount=1407
Posts: 47,152

07-27-2013, 05:46 PM	#3
Sweet Daddy Hate Unsparing Join Date: Aug 2008 Casino cash: $10004900	He played a hell of a game against NE in 2009, but ended up losing anyway. __________________ 1. Merciless, severe. 2. Given freely and generously. 100% refusal to overrate 20 year Head Coaches with ZERO **ing rings as a Head Coach. CP's Official Professor of 'Dem Blues for 2019/2020!**
Posts: 77,135

07-27-2013, 05:52 PM	#4
BossChief SuperBowl or bust Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: BF Iowa Casino cash: $1684088	Romo has to constantly try to win shootouts and has put the team on his back for years now. Id also like to believe that a change of scenery would do him well in helping to limit his distractions. __________________ Dreams do come true... http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...postcount=1407
Posts: 47,152

07-27-2013, 05:55 PM	#7
Chiefs Pantalones GO CHIEFS!!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $7888717	Romo is 1-5 in must win games to either get to the playoffs or win in the playoffs. The one win coming in the 09 playoffs. The other five times he has shit the bed. Of all the QBs CP rags on he is deserving of it, IMO. __________________ Don't be fooled by my username, I'm white.
Posts: 26,630

07-27-2013, 06:42 PM	#10
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $4500478	Look at Alex Smith doing nothing for an entire quarter AND overtime while Tony Romo wins the damn game. Alex Smith had three chances to win the game here and did absolutely nothing but get sacked and fart around. He gave Romo enough chances and then BOOM, 77-yard killshot. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 278,505

07-27-2013, 07:02 PM	#11
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	Nah, they'd install the read-option. That's definitely not a gimmick that the league will figure out shortly.
Posts: 58,682

07-27-2013, 07:12 PM	#13
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	I remember reading around superbowl time how part of the reason SF kept Kaep on the field is because ASmith couldn't effectively run the read-option, that he allowed them to do things they couldn't do with Smith under center. And then in march the reason we picked him up is because he's so effective with the WCO. And now we're installing the read-option. It's so bizarre how all these stories are going. It's like every story contradicts the last.
Posts: 58,682

07-27-2013, 08:17 PM	#15
notorious Supporter Join Date: May 2005 Location: Who knows? Casino cash: $2715884	We had shit QBs and the most horrifically reeruned offensive staff in football history last year. I plan on seeing vast improvement from McCluster and other players like him.
Posts: 83,527