It was like I was back in 1995 again or something... - Page 2

Chiefs Pantalones · 09-10-2006, 04:56 PM

Really. I thought I was watching Marty and his playing not-to-lose ball we all loved so much back in the day. Like ESPN classic without the classic.

Was it just me, or did anyone else think the offense was like a caged animal out there? I thought we could do much more, and be way more aggressive like last year, even without Roaf and Welbourn, but Herm or Solari, or both, had the offense in handcuffs. Way too conservative on offense, I thought.

The defense had a lot of upside, I thought. You don't get to say that often around here too much. The mistakes that were made were correctable.

Now if we just get Carl to inplace a clause to where he can't touch the offense, kind of like Dungy's in Indy, then we'll be fine. That, and get Green back healthy.

mikey23545 · 09-10-2006, 05:14 PM

The offense was not conservative by choice. The Chiefs threw 35 times, compared to 25 rushes.

And how the hell were they supposed to throw deep patterns when the QB's couldn't even get enough time to throw quick slants?

Deberg_1990 · 09-10-2006, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jets_Fan7

Oh yeah nice one but if you didn't notice Pennington is leading NFL QB's in yards with 319. Sorry but no I just shut you up.

Huh?? It was a slam on Paul Hackett, not Pennington dumbass.

JBucc · 09-10-2006, 05:18 PM

Damn you Herm! How dare you not see the future and realize your left and right tackles would quit just before the season started and that your other RT would be hurt and I-65 would have to start! DV and Al would have drafted someone five years ago just for this situation. You suck Martyclone.

Deberg_1990 · 09-10-2006, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545

The offense was not conservative by choice. The Chiefs threw 35 times, compared to 25 rushes.

And how the hell were they supposed to throw deep patterns when the QB's couldn't even get enough time to throw quick slants?

Well said....exactly. Solari has his hands tied right now. and LJ is going to have one HUGE bullseye on his head this year since teams will just load up with 8 men in the box against him until Green returns.

Chiefs Pantalones · 09-10-2006, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs

Yeah. The Buffalo game was worse last year.

I disagree. This game was worse because it was at home, where we usually do much better.

09-10-2006, 04:56 PM
Chiefs Pantalones GO CHIEFS!!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $7888717	It was like I was back in 1995 again or something... Really. I thought I was watching Marty and his playing not-to-lose ball we all loved so much back in the day. Like ESPN classic without the classic. Was it just me, or did anyone else think the offense was like a caged animal out there? I thought we could do much more, and be way more aggressive like last year, even without Roaf and Welbourn, but Herm or Solari, or both, had the offense in handcuffs. Way too conservative on offense, I thought. The defense had a lot of upside, I thought. You don't get to say that often around here too much. The mistakes that were made were correctable. Now if we just get Carl to inplace a clause to where he can't touch the offense, kind of like Dungy's in Indy, then we'll be fine. That, and get Green back healthy.
Posts: 26,630

09-10-2006, 05:14 PM	#16
mikey23545 MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10015321	The offense was not conservative by choice. The Chiefs threw 35 times, compared to 25 rushes. And how the hell were they supposed to throw deep patterns when the QB's couldn't even get enough time to throw quick slants?
Posts: 12,314

09-10-2006, 05:18 PM	#18
JBucc MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Casino cash: $10004952	Damn you Herm! How dare you not see the future and realize your left and right tackles would quit just before the season started and that your other RT would be hurt and I-65 would have to start! DV and Al would have drafted someone five years ago just for this situation. You suck Martyclone.
Posts: 12,016