Movies and TV The Amazing Spider Man trailer - Page 13

Chiefs Pantalones · 07-03-2012, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lcarus

Isn't Emma Stone playing Gwen Stacy?

Brock · 07-03-2012, 10:11 AM

Also: The obligatory cameo by Stan Lee is one of the funniest parts of the movie, instead of being just a crappy forced afterthought like it usually is.

DBOSHO · 07-03-2012, 02:07 PM

I dont know why everyone loved this movie. I thought it was okay but nothing to blow a load over. I was pretty dissapointed.

Brock · 07-03-2012, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO

I dont know why everyone loved this movie. I thought it was okay but nothing to blow a load over. I was pretty dissapointed.

You've made it clear you like shitty movies.

DBOSHO · 07-03-2012, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

You've made it clear you like shitty movies.

I bet you liked green lantern too.

10/10. Ryan Reynolds. JFK

Brock · 07-03-2012, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBOSHO

I bet you liked green lantern too.

10/10. Ryan Reynolds. JFK

The other spider man films were closer to green lantern than this one was. Your opinion can be safely ignored.

DBOSHO · 07-04-2012, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

The other spider man films were closer to green lantern than this one was. Your opinion can be safely ignored.

**kysirsoze** · 07-03-2012, 07:55 PM

8/10 Garfield was great. Stone was good, too. Rhys Ifans was great as Conners but got a little moustache-twirly as the movie went on. Sheen was a fantastic Uncle Ben, though Sally Fields was a little hit and miss as Aunt May.

Peter/Spidey was written with much more depth and care than in the past. My only real gripe with the movie is somewhat two-fold. I love the cheesy lines as they are integral to Spider-man's style, but some of the plot points stretched the confines of acceptable hokeyness. The plot also fell victim to a number of well-worn cliches. That's not the end of the world, but in a reboot of a movie that is a mere decade old, you should really do what you can to surprise and engage your audience.

Overall, great job. It's a LOT closer to what the first movie should have been and I loved the first two films. I am really looking forward to the next one.

Gravedigger · 07-03-2012, 10:58 PM

[rant]

Anyone else annoyed how the one main gripe of this film is that its too soon of a reboot? All these reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes who hated the movie had the same, Deja Vu it was done ten years ago mentality and I see these reviews as empty words.

You knew it was going to be a reboot. You want them to continue on the same storyline with a new cast, new director, and new vision for how Spidey's story goes? Given it was 20 some odd years after the original films but lets ask Superman Returns how that venture went.

Rumor had it that Sam Raimi couldn't get his vision for Spiderman 4 out in time for the July 4th weekend of this year so Sony went with the reboot and new people instead. I commend Marc Webb and the entire crew for getting something like this out in that amount of time. I think it was time for Raimi to move on anyways. I really don't think Spiderman 4 would've masked 3, in all honesty, especially with supposedly Morbius as one of the main villains. Unless you did Carnage, it had no shot imo. Its like if they tried to make movies after X3, after you've killed major characters that never died in the ways they did in the comics, you've destroyed that franchise, and its time to restart.

Instead of griping about the speed of the reboot why don't you tell me more intricate details about the movie. The cast, the action scenes, the tone, the emotions, ya know everything else that goes into a movie. It's a one trick pony show from a reviewer that focuses on one innate point like Matt Cassel does on Dewayne Bowe. Get over it and do your job.

[/rant]

BWillie · 07-04-2012, 01:47 AM

Another Spiderman movie that looks hilariously terrible. A man dressed as a spider fighting a dinosaur. Are you fucking kidding me

Wallcrawler · 07-04-2012, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007

Another Spiderman movie that looks hilariously terrible. A man dressed as a spider fighting a dinosaur. Are you fucking kidding me

Your and idiot.

JD10367 · 07-04-2012, 09:59 AM

As hot as Emma is, I must admit, Ron Howard's daughter as a platinum blonde had some pants-tenting appeal for me.

Pushead2 · 07-04-2012, 02:59 PM

Saw it last night - got an hour in and the audio was not in synced with the film. They said they couldn't fix it and gave us a free pass.

I will NOT be using that free pass to finish the film. D-

Jewish Rabbi · 07-04-2012, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pushead2

Saw it last night - got an hour in and the audio was not in synced with the film. They said they couldn't fix it and gave us a free pass.

I will NOT be using that free pass to finish the film. D-

It got better as the film went on. Started out a little too slow for me as well.

Micjones · 07-04-2012, 03:20 PM

Headed to see this in about 40 minutes.

07-03-2012, 10:11 AM	#2
Brock Say hello to my little friend Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Larryville Casino cash: $9598422	Also: The obligatory cameo by Stan Lee is one of the funniest parts of the movie, instead of being just a crappy forced afterthought like it usually is.
Posts: 47,314

07-03-2012, 02:07 PM	#3
DBOSHO trap champ Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	I dont know why everyone loved this movie. I thought it was okay but nothing to blow a load over. I was pretty dissapointed. __________________ Orginator of the group repost
Posts: 5,445

07-03-2012, 07:55 PM	#8
kysirsoze SNAP THE ****ING BALL!!! Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $3606946	8/10 Garfield was great. Stone was good, too. Rhys Ifans was great as Conners but got a little moustache-twirly as the movie went on. Sheen was a fantastic Uncle Ben, though Sally Fields was a little hit and miss as Aunt May. Peter/Spidey was written with much more depth and care than in the past. My only real gripe with the movie is somewhat two-fold. I love the cheesy lines as they are integral to Spider-man's style, but some of the plot points stretched the confines of acceptable hokeyness. The plot also fell victim to a number of well-worn cliches. That's not the end of the world, but in a reboot of a movie that is a mere decade old, you should really do what you can to surprise and engage your audience. Overall, great job. It's a LOT closer to what the first movie should have been and I loved the first two films. I am really looking forward to the next one.
Posts: 11,306

07-03-2012, 10:58 PM	#9
Gravedigger Plays to win the game! Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Lees Summit Casino cash: $7243101	[rant] Anyone else annoyed how the one main gripe of this film is that its too soon of a reboot? All these reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes who hated the movie had the same, Deja Vu it was done ten years ago mentality and I see these reviews as empty words. You knew it was going to be a reboot. You want them to continue on the same storyline with a new cast, new director, and new vision for how Spidey's story goes? Given it was 20 some odd years after the original films but lets ask Superman Returns how that venture went. Rumor had it that Sam Raimi couldn't get his vision for Spiderman 4 out in time for the July 4th weekend of this year so Sony went with the reboot and new people instead. I commend Marc Webb and the entire crew for getting something like this out in that amount of time. I think it was time for Raimi to move on anyways. I really don't think Spiderman 4 would've masked 3, in all honesty, especially with supposedly Morbius as one of the main villains. Unless you did Carnage, it had no shot imo. Its like if they tried to make movies after X3, after you've killed major characters that never died in the ways they did in the comics, you've destroyed that franchise, and its time to restart. Instead of griping about the speed of the reboot why don't you tell me more intricate details about the movie. The cast, the action scenes, the tone, the emotions, ya know everything else that goes into a movie. It's a one trick pony show from a reviewer that focuses on one innate point like Matt Cassel does on Dewayne Bowe. Get over it and do your job. [/rant]
Posts: 7,570

07-04-2012, 01:47 AM	#10
BWillie Future NBA Finals MVP Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Earth Casino cash: $2281241	Another Spiderman movie that looks hilariously terrible. A man dressed as a spider fighting a dinosaur. Are you fucking kidding me __________________ Who wants free money? Use the link below to sign up at Bovada, BetOnline, Black Chip Poker and Ignition. Contact me for private deals, spot bonuses, possible rakeback or any questions! Bovada, Ignition, BetOnline, Black Chip Poker: baldeaglepoker.com Bovada Poker is back! Get up to $500 poker deposit bonus.
Posts: 46,153

07-04-2012, 09:59 AM	#12
JD10367 Cheaterlover* Join Date: May 2009 Location: RI Casino cash: $10010716	As hot as Emma is, I must admit, Ron Howard's daughter as a platinum blonde had some pants-tenting appeal for me.
Posts: 12,916

07-04-2012, 02:59 PM	#13
Pushead2 **** off Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: New York Casino cash: $7301882	Saw it last night - got an hour in and the audio was not in synced with the film. They said they couldn't fix it and gave us a free pass. I will NOT be using that free pass to finish the film. D- __________________ "**** up once, lose two teeth....”
Posts: 5,212

07-04-2012, 03:20 PM	#15
Micjones Whose house? Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $10005180	Headed to see this in about 40 minutes. __________________ It's like when I'm right I'm right, when I'm wrong I could been right, so I'm still right cause I coulda been wrong.
Posts: 15,344