Chiefs How attractive do the Chiefs jobs become if the get the 1st pick of the draft?

Chiefnj2 · 10-25-2012, 10:56 AM

When Scott first took the job wasn't there an article about the little things Pioli was doing like no longer using color copies for meetings and printing on both sides of the page? I don't know if the GM still controls things like that, but if so, I can't imagine the job being too attractive. I want the GM to focus on football, not saving pennies by comparing Staples ink prices to what he can find on Amazon.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 10-25-2012, 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

When Scott first took the job wasn't there an article about the little things Pioli was doing like no longer using color copies for meetings and printing on both sides of the page? I don't know if the GM still controls things like that, but if so, I can't imagine the job being too attractive. I want the GM to focus on football, not saving pennies by comparing Staples ink prices to what he can find on Amazon.

Great job, Scott.

**Easy 6** · 10-25-2012, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

When Scott first took the job wasn't there an article about the little things Pioli was doing like no longer using color copies for meetings and printing on both sides of the page? I don't know if the GM still controls things like that, but if so, I can't imagine the job being too attractive. I want the GM to focus on football, not saving pennies by comparing Staples ink prices to what he can find on Amazon.

Count wins, not beans.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 10-25-2012, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free

Count wins, not beans.

He should count the hairs on his FAIL ass.

bricks · 10-25-2012, 11:38 AM

Good question Laz. Who really knows? Im not certain if attractiveness has to do with the 1st overall pick. I think attractiveness towards an organization is determined by other factors.

Part of me thinks that attractiveness towards an organization is based on reputation. Or it could even be towards stuff like ownership credibility?

What bothers me the most is that this organization has had a losing reputation for the last 7, 8 years and seemingly so an absentee owner who does not get heavily involved nor has a winning first mentality. With that being said, I don't get the feel of KC being an attractive destination for a lot of the management executives across the league for those reasons.

As far as coaches go, I think attractiveness is due to their relationship/ties with the management staff. I mean we are seeing it now with all these Patriot trees/connections to Pioli(Daboll & Crennel). I would like to think that would same case situation if we decided to bring a new GM here.

**DeezNutz** · 10-25-2012, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

When Scott first took the job wasn't there an article about the little things Pioli was doing like no longer using color copies for meetings and printing on both sides of the page? I don't know if the GM still controls things like that, but if so, I can't imagine the job being too attractive. I want the GM to focus on football, not saving pennies by comparing Staples ink prices to what he can find on Amazon.

Was he doing this of his own volition or because of demands by Clark?

10-25-2012, 10:56 AM	#1
Chiefnj2 In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $7873688	When Scott first took the job wasn't there an article about the little things Pioli was doing like no longer using color copies for meetings and printing on both sides of the page? I don't know if the GM still controls things like that, but if so, I can't imagine the job being too attractive. I want the GM to focus on football, not saving pennies by comparing Staples ink prices to what he can find on Amazon. __________________ Mismanaging the clock.
Posts: 22,394

10-25-2012, 11:38 AM	#5
bricks Hey Teacher! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: land of maple syrup Casino cash: $9902559	Good question Laz. Who really knows? Im not certain if attractiveness has to do with the 1st overall pick. I think attractiveness towards an organization is determined by other factors. Part of me thinks that attractiveness towards an organization is based on reputation. Or it could even be towards stuff like ownership credibility? What bothers me the most is that this organization has had a losing reputation for the last 7, 8 years and seemingly so an absentee owner who does not get heavily involved nor has a winning first mentality. With that being said, I don't get the feel of KC being an attractive destination for a lot of the management executives across the league for those reasons. As far as coaches go, I think attractiveness is due to their relationship/ties with the management staff. I mean we are seeing it now with all these Patriot trees/connections to Pioli(Daboll & Crennel). I would like to think that would same case situation if we decided to bring a new GM here.
Posts: 5,513