***Official New EMAW Repository thread***

[kstater]

Old one crapping out the server.

[Saulbadguy]

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish

Courtesy of goemaw.com by way of the Jim Rome Show.

He's OUT OF CONTROL!!111

[ChiTown]

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy

He's OUT OF CONTROL!!111

John Currie needs to get Frank under control. His fame is going to distract from what this team is doing. Did you see the way he swatted Merriewether's hand the other year? JFC, the guy is a maniac.

And just think of where we would be if Greg McDermott had not turned us down for Iowa State............1, maybe 2 NCAA Championships? One is only left with their solemn thoughts in contemplating this, "what if"

[Los Pollos Hermanos]

So, what's the tie-breaker on the 4th seed if we were to lose on Saturday?

[WilliamTheIrish]

Originally Posted by ChiefsfansofDallas

So, what's the tie-breaker on the 4th seed if we were to lose on Saturday?

There will be NO discussion of losing on Saturday.

[Old Dog]

Originally Posted by ChiefsfansofDallas

So, what's the tie-breaker on the 4th seed if we were to lose on Saturday?

Tiebreakers - The first criteria in the breaking of ties in the standings shall be head-to-head competition of tied teams. The following procedure will be used to establish the championship seeds if ties exist. (For tiebreaking procedures teams will be grouped in two divisions based upon established guidelines. Colorado, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, Missouri and Nebraska are in one division and Baylor, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas A&M and Texas Tech are in the other division.)

(a) If two teams are tied and they are from different divisions, the winner of the game between the two tied teams shall be the higher seed.
(b) If two teams are tied and they are from the same division, the team with an advantage in head-to-head competition shall be the higher seed.
(c) If two teams remain tied, there will be a comparison of overall record against division teams only (10 divisional games).
(d) If two teams remain tied, there will be a comparison of record against the highest ranked team(s) (based upon Conference winning percentage) in the division and proceeding through in order of divisional record.
(e) If two teams remain tied, there will be a *comparison of record against the highest ranked team(s) (based upon Conference winning percentage) in the opposite division and proceeding through in order of divisional record.
(f) If two teams remain tied, the higher seed will be chosen by draw.
(g) If three or more teams are tied, ties among divisional opponents will be broken first by using steps (b) through (f) and the head-to-head results will be used to break ties between non-divisional teams. When three or more teams from the same division are tied step (b) will consist of a mini- round robin among the tied teams. At any point during the process of breaking ties among three or more teams that the number of tied teams are reduced to two, head-to-head competition would be used as the primary tie-breaker, followed-by steps (c) through (f). Once a team is eliminated from a multi-team comparison, it is dropped from further comparisons.

[ChiTown]

Originally Posted by ChiefsfansofDallas

So, what's the tie-breaker on the 4th seed if we were to lose on Saturday?

OK, if we lose to ISU on Saturday, we finish 9-7. Only two other teams have a shot at 9-7. MU and CU. If MU beats KU, they would be the 4 seed, no matter what CU does. They would have a better record against the top North Team vs what CU has. If CU wins out (@ISU and home against NU), and MU and KSU both lose, they get the 4 seed over KSU because of their sweep against KSU.

I think I have that correct.

[WilliamTheIrish]

Frank's record in Big 12 Roadies:

16-16 in road games.

Wooly, Asbury, and Altman COMBINED were 19-102.

[Saulbadguy]

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish

Frank's record in Big 12 Roadies:

We should have never fired Altman.

KSU fans were just out of touch with Asbury.

KSU fans should have given Wooly more time, he was a solid X's and O's coach, he just needed more talent.

[Dante84]

Wooly, Asbury, and Altman COMBINED were 19-102.

To be fair to Wooldridge, traveling can be hard on the neck.

[Old Dog]

Originally Posted by ChiTown

I think I have that correct.

I don't think so:
If all three finish 9-7 step B consists of a mini-round robin where CU would hold a 3-1 record over MU and KSU. CU would be the #4, MU #5, KSU #6.

If MU and KSU are each 9-7 and CU is 8-8, MU would have the edge with a 6-4 record vs the north compared to 5-5 for KSU


Bottom line, we just need to beat the #12 team in the conference in our house on saturday.

[Saulbadguy]

As always - just refer to this.

http://www.notnothing.net/bball/b12mbb.php

[Saulbadguy]

Worst we can do is a 6 seed.

Best we can do is a 3 seed.

[ChiTown]

Originally Posted by truebigdog

I don't think so:
If all three finish 9-7 step B consists of a mini-round robin where CU would hold a 3-1 record over MU and KSU. CU would be the #4, MU #5, KSU #6.

If MU and KSU are each 9-7 and CU is 8-8, MU would have the edge with a 6-4 record vs the north compared to 5-5 for KSU


Bottom line, we just need to beat the #12 team in the conference in our house on saturday.

The question was about the #4 seed, if we lost. I think I said the same thing you did. CU get's it if they win out and MU loses, and MU get's it with a win against KU. KSU only get's #4 with a loss to ISU, if CU doesn't sweep and MU loses to KU.

[Old Dog]

Originally Posted by ChiTown

The question was about the #4 seed, if we lost. I think I said the same thing you did. CU get's it if they win out and MU loses, and MU get's it with a win against KU. KSU only get's #4 with a loss to ISU, if CU doesn't sweep and MU loses to KU.

The bolded part is incorrect. If we're all 9-7, Colorado beats Mizzou and KSU in the mini round robin.

[ChiTown]

Originally Posted by truebigdog

The bolded part is incorrect. If we're all 9-7, Colorado beats Mizzou and KSU in the mini round robin.

You are absolutely correct on that. My bad.