**** OFFICIAL 2012 Kansas Football Repository Thread ****

[ArrowheadHawk]

New Coach, New year, new thread.

Sat, Sept. 1 SDSU at Kansas Memorial Stadium
Lawrence, KS at 6:00p.m. CT Jayhawk IMG TV Network

Sat, Sept. 8 Rice at Kansas Memorial Stadium
Lawrence, KS FSN at 2:30p.m. CT Fox Sports Net

Sat, Sept. 15 TCU at Kansas Memorial Stadium
Lawrence, KS at 11:00a.m. CT FX

Sat, Sept. 22 Kansas at No. Illinois
DeKalb, Illinois

Sat, Oct. 6 Kansas at Kansas State Bill Snyder Family Stadium
Manhattan, KS

Sat, Oct. 13 Okla. St. at Kansas Memorial Stadium
Lawrence, KS

Sat, Oct. 20 Kansas at Oklahoma Oklahoma Memorial Stadium
Norman, OK

Sat, Oct. 27 Texas at Kansas Memorial Stadium
Lawrence, KS

Sat, Nov. 3 Kansas at Baylor Floyd Casey Stadium
Waco, TX

Sat, Nov. 10 Kansas at TT Jones AT&T Stadium
Lubbock, TX

Sat, Nov. 17 Iowa State at Kansas Memorial Stadium
Lawrence, KS

Sat, Dec. 1 Kansas at West Virginia
Morgantown, W.V.

[Bambi]

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow

True - but they all have varying levels of eligibility left.

These opposing viewpoints are getting so annoying.

It would be one thing if they were intelligent.

But these are just flat out wrong and uninformed.

[mnchiefsguy]

Originally Posted by Wickedson

These opposing viewpoints are getting so annoying.

It would be one thing if they were intelligent.

But these are just flat out wrong and uninformed.

Well, if anyone is familiar with being wrong and uninformed, it would be you. You are CP's expert on that particular topic.

[Bambi]

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

Well, if anyone is familiar with being wrong and uninformed, it would be you. You are CP's expert on that particular topic.

not really. next

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

Well, if anyone is familiar with being wrong and uninformed, it would be you. You are CP's expert on that particular topic.

not really. next

Exhibit A

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow

True - but they all have varying levels of eligibility left.

I know. Its still weird to decide to add that many QBs in a single year, though. Not saying it's good or bad. Just seems like he'd want to leave himself some room to add some better ones down the road is all. He's got a pretty dood track record with QBs, so I'm not going to pretend to know better. Still unusual.

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Wickedson

not really. next

Building off of yesterday's collection of wisdom, I see. You are a fantastic football mind and bring much to the discussion.

[Bambi]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

I know. Its still weird to decide to add that many QBs in a single year, though. Not saying it's good or bad. Just seems like he'd want to leave himself some room to add some better ones down the road is all. He's got a pretty dood track record with QBs, so I'm not going to pretend to know better. Still unusual.

What do you mean?

Crist is done at the end of the year.

They have Michael Cummings and maybe another QB on the roster.

None of which have game experience.

It's completely fine to add three QBs in one season after a regime change.

Especially when one of them isn't eligible for another season.

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Wickedson

You still feel bad?

OK, lets talk football.

I posted Turner Baty has committed to Kansas.

What is your contribution to the subject?

That I find it odd for a team to add this many QBs in a single offseason. I don't know that the addition of a 3rd or 4th string QB to a 2 win team warrants an in depth analysis, but I'm certain that it doesn't warrant the mindless garbage you shit out with regularity.

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Wickedson

What do you mean?

Crist is done at the end of the year.

They have Michael Cummings and maybe another QB on the roster.

None of which have game experience.

It's completely fine to add three QBs in one season after a regime change.

Especially when one of them isn't eligible for another season.

Never said it wasn't fine. Just said it was unusual to address the QB spots in this manner, especially when you run off your starter (admittedly on what appears to be amicable terms) who I believe had 2 years of eligibility left.

I certainly can't recall anything like this happening before. Can you?

[Bambi]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Never said it wasn't fine. Just said it was unusual to address the QB spots in this manner, especially when you run off your starter (admittedly on what appears to be amicable terms) who I believe had 2 years of eligibility left.

I certainly can't recall anything like this happening before. Can you?

A QB transferring because the school is changing systems?

Sure, you have a few hours??

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Wickedson

A QB transferring because the school is changing systems?

Sure, you have a few hours??

If that's what you took from my post, maybe you were right to simply post inanities.

[Mr_Tomahawk]

[Braincase]

My question is more along the lines of "Why do you fu***** care?".

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Braincase

My question is more along the lines of "Why do you fu***** care?".

**** off and put me on ignore like you've said you had done multiple times. I'm talking about football with other people talking about football, and Wickedson walks in and starts shitting all over the place.

[Lzen]

Originally Posted by Saul Good

**** off and put me on ignore like you've said you had done multiple times. I'm talking about football with other people talking about football, and Wickedson walks in and starts shitting all over the place.

It has already been addressed multiple times. You think its unusual. Fine. That's your prerogative to believe that. But I think it is not unusual when you consider its a new coach and a completely new system. Not to mention that your projected starter next year will be gone the year after and the second QB will only have 2 years remaining. It doesn't seem strange at all unless they were all coming out of high school. And even then it wouldn't be THAT strange or unusual, IMO.