clady's deal is done

[-King-]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

I don't think you're watching Albert or Clady.

I think you're looking at stats as the determination as to how well each player has performed.

That's bogus, but whatever.

I'm looking at stats and I'm looking at performance. Albert like Clady has never been a liability. Like OTWP said a few months ago, I've never gone into a game worried about how Albert is going to perform against a certain pass rusher. He's a great LT that's never had the luxury of playing with a QB with any resemblance of pocket presence.

[aturnis]

Originally Posted by -King-

I'm looking at stats and I'm looking at performance. Albert like Clady has never been a liability. Like OTWP said a few months ago, I've never gone into a game worried about how Albert is going to perform against a certain pass rusher. He's a great LT that's never had the luxury of playing with a QB with any resemblance of pocket presence.

Tru dat.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by -King-

I'm looking at stats and I'm looking at performance. Albert like Clady has never been a liability. Like OTWP said a few months ago, I've never gone into a game worried about how Albert is going to perform against a certain pass rusher. He's a great LT that's never had the luxury of playing with a QB with any resemblance of pocket presence.

If he was "great" he'd have been paid like he was "great" and the Chiefs would have rolled the dice on a different position at 1.1.

Or, someone would have given up a 2nd or 3rd rounder for a "great" left tackle.