U.S. Issues 911 was an inside job. - Page 60

Taco John · 02-08-2006, 11:06 PM

After watching this, I am once and for all convinced that it was an inside job...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81991288263801

The evidence is way too strong.

CHIEF4EVER · 02-17-2006, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee

Lookout folks, TJ has a new question/observation to make a bajillion times.

Has there ever been, in the history of the CP, a thread with as many posts and as little accomplished?

A: There's a ton of questions
B: Here are some answers
A: Those answers are The Man whitewashing your brain
B: Whatever, dude.

Rinse and Repeat.

TJ: Priest has lost his burst. He is Finito, finished, fin.

CP Poster: Umm, no he isn't.

TJ: Yes he is. If you saw the video, you would know how serious it was by the flaming meteor striking him in the hip whilst being tackled. Also, Bo Jackson never came back from the same injury.

CP Poster: Dude, Priest didn't suffer the same injury as Bo according to team officials and the team Dr.

TJ: That's just the Chiefs front office blowing smoke. They are hiding the extent of Holmes' injuries.

CP Poster: Hey moe-ron, Priest just broke a couple of NFL records.

TJ: Whatever, dude. He is done. He has lost his burst.

Yup, looks pretty familiar. Save it Teej, you accomplished what you wanted to accomplish with your poop stirring thread but I am not fooled for an instant as to your true motivation.........

Taco John · 02-17-2006, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

Speaking of checking credentials, some of the "experts" mentioned in the article linked by banyon and hailed by Taco have some interesting backgrounds (very few of which lie in science, btw).

I didn't hail any of Banyon's links... what are you talking about, you clown?

I hailed my own links, which are peer reviewed scientists with PHDs in their fields... not to mention a scientific journal of metals.

Taco John · 02-17-2006, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish

I got see the video finally.

I have to honestly say,I'm more than a little uneasy after seeing that. I mean very, very uneasy.

I mean.....****.

Let me tell you... You're just scratching the surface with that video. The more you dig, the more the official story becomes preposterous.

Read these two peer reviewed papers on this:

http://911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

They're both damning stuff...

Then reading the Journal of Metals analysis of the official story after the event:

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...agar-0112.html

They certainly don't get into any conspiritorial aspects of it, but just basically say that the official story is bunk.

**banyon** · 02-17-2006, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

I didn't hail any of Banyon's links... what are you talking about, you clown?

I hailed my own links, which are peer reviewed scientists with PHDs in their fields... not to mention a scientific journal of metals.

yeah, don't hail my links!

We wouldn't want that.

Taco John · 02-17-2006, 02:10 PM

Ah, he's talking about this link... I see what he's saying:

http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/1/emw339303.htm

Basically, he's willing to attack their credibility, but not willing to address the content of their claims...

Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar find profoundly troubling:

* In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day?

* The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks.

* Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed.

* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires.

* Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact.

* Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing.

* Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite.

* A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles.

* A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction.

* The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon.

Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints.

These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality."

Taco John · 02-17-2006, 02:48 PM

Besides... None of that video can be true. Their music was done by DJ Skooly. How can any of it be true if that's the case?

Logical · 02-17-2006, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish

I got see the video finally.

I have to honestly say,I'm more than a little uneasy after seeing that. I mean very, very uneasy.

I mean.....****.

Anybody with an open mind would feel this way WTI, anyone of reason.

Hydrae · 02-17-2006, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish

I got see the video finally.

I have to honestly say,I'm more than a little uneasy after seeing that. I mean very, very uneasy.

I mean.....****.

To quote Arsenio..."Things that make you go, hmmmm."

Logical · 02-17-2006, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

If there is any truth to any of it, this is where it lies:

Not with explosives and a government conspiracy.

Taco is willing this bad boy to 1,000.....a man on a mission. Heh.

...

Hell at least TJ brings up an interesting topic and gets a solid discussion.

**Mr. Kotter** · 02-17-2006, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

This coming from you one of the biggest self aggrandizing attention whores on this BB is pure comedy gold Kotter.

Hell at least TJ brings up an interesting topic and gets a solid discussion without having to pretend he is drunk afterward.

And, you, posting that, raises the level of irony to a new Planet high.....

You hold onto things, Jim. It was a year ago. Let it go, like most have--except you, TJ, and a few others who haven't. Grudges aren't good for you....

No one has exclusive rights to Dumbassery, here. We all seem to take our turns.....some more often than others.

Logical · 02-17-2006, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kotter

And, you, posting that, raises the level of irony to a new Planet high.....

You hold onto things, Jim. It was a year ago. Let it go, like most have--except you, TJ, and a few others who haven't. Grudges aren't good for you....

No one has exclusive rights to Dumbassery, here. We all seem to take our turns.....some more often than others.

TJ has posted an interesting topic that has generated a ton of interesting discussion. ,,,

irishjayhawk · 02-17-2006, 03:54 PM

Quote:

If there is any truth to any of it, this is where it lies:

Not with explosives and a government conspiracy.

Taco is willing this bad boy to 1,000.....a man on a mission. Heh.

I thought there was plenty of evidence to support a rational explanation on how this is impossible. I guess physics goes out the window.

Currently, I am reading those articles that TJ provided links to and I am going to watch a film apparently discussing just what rules of physics the WTC broke that day.

**Mr. Kotter** · 02-17-2006, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

....Your post appears to be the result of pure jealousy.

You gotta be kidding, right? I mean, seriously...."jealous" over a thread? My, oh my, you and I live in different worlds.

I'll tell you what, I'll see if I can help TJ, to push this over the 1000 mark, okay?

Jim. I can't fathom that for the life of me; odd, to my way of thinking, that anyone would be jealous over such a thing....but to each his own.

Taco John · 02-17-2006, 05:08 PM

I would appreciate it if we could stay on topic here. There is a lot of science that has been thrown out here that I don't want to see put on the back burner to personal attacks. Even if Sybil, er Kotter (or whateer username he's using) is an easy target.

Logical · 02-17-2006, 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

I would appreciate it if we could stay on topic here. There is a lot of science that has been thrown out here that I don't want to see put on the back burner to personal attacks. Even if Sybil, er Kotter (or whateer username he's using) is an easy target.

Fair enough.

02-08-2006, 11:06 PM
Taco John 12on Paul Join Date: Jun 2001 Casino cash: $10084457	911 was an inside job. After watching this, I am once and for all convinced that it was an inside job... http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...81991288263801 The evidence is way too strong.
Posts: 49,357

02-17-2006, 02:10 PM	#890
Taco John 12on Paul Join Date: Jun 2001 Casino cash: $10084457	Ah, he's talking about this link... I see what he's saying: http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/1/emw339303.htm Basically, he's willing to attack their credibility, but not willing to address the content of their claims... Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar find profoundly troubling: * In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? * The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. * Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. * Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. * Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. * Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, "Do the orders still stand?" The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have been the opposite. * A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. * A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. * The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints. These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach--which has been identified by Karl Rove, the President's closest adviser--of "creating our own reality."
Posts: 49,357

02-17-2006, 02:48 PM	#891
Taco John 12on Paul Join Date: Jun 2001 Casino cash: $10084457	Besides... None of that video can be true. Their music was done by DJ Skooly. How can any of it be true if that's the case?
Posts: 49,357

02-17-2006, 05:08 PM	#899
Taco John 12on Paul Join Date: Jun 2001 Casino cash: $10084457	I would appreciate it if we could stay on topic here. There is a lot of science that has been thrown out here that I don't want to see put on the back burner to personal attacks. Even if Sybil, er Kotter (or whateer username he's using) is an easy target.
Posts: 49,357

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode