Cassel did, does, and will always suck

[Thig Lyfe]

I had backed off on my Cassel hate in the second half of the season because he actually started to play with a modicum of competence. But I never stopped being wary of him, because he was playing well against shitty, shitty ****ing teams.

But today is proof positive that Cassel is NOT the answer. He will NOT be a franchise quarterback. He simply doesn't have the ability or the intelligence that is required. He never really progressed this season; he just managed to not shit himself against the NFC West.

Can we all just agree that he's not the answer? Please?

[JASONSAUTO]

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

But if someone like Steve Young, Gannon, Sims, etc.. Want to give an "analysis" on his footwork, reads, release, etc...

Then I would be willing to listen and accept their "analysis" of the QB position...

But to take someone like Teicher, Wright, Whitlock and others here that have a personal agenda just isnt going to fly. If you want to debate something without a personal vendetta, I am all for it. But do get into a dick measure Cassel hate festival? Its old and wore out... Nothing new to see...

Exactly.
Posted via Mobile Device

[Tribal Warfare]

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Your point?

It would be called an "analysis" if it was someone qualified to give that "analysis"...

Okay so if Rich Gannon said that Cassel could be a young Peyton Manning you'd take it to heart which he did on air on 810?

Also, I don't live or die on their articles it's news to be discussed about, like any other media outlet like (ESPN, CBSsports,SI).

Why do you think that this BB was created? To share opinions, they may not be "experts", but certain individuals make good points through their analysis that you or me may not of thought of. All information is relevant it's how you perceive it dictates its value.

[Dave]

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

that's what's called analysis, like watching footwork ( is it good or isn't it), throwing mechanics ect... It's just a nice cop out or yours.

So, what do you think of Rivers' mechanics?

His are ****ing horrible. So we're Marino's.

Explain that.

[Tribal Warfare]

Originally Posted by Dave

So, what do you think of Rivers' mechanics?

His are ****ing horrible. So we're Marino's.

Explain that.

precisely, it's the perception of that they have shitty mechanics but it gets the job done.

[ChiefsCountry]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

This is hilarious.

Would josh freeman be a different player right now had he fallen to round 2?

What about mark sanchez? Drafted by the jets. only thing different is draft spot. What would make him a different player today?
Posted via Mobile Device

History pretty much proves that second round QBs fail.

[ChiefsCountry]

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

But to take someone like Teicher, Wright, Whitlock and others here that have a personal agenda just isnt going to fly. If you want to debate something without a personal vendetta, I am all for it. But do get into a dick measure Cassel hate festival? Its old and wore out... Nothing new to see...

This is hillarious coming from the guy who had a personal vendetta against Herm, yet calls other people out for it. Nice double standard douchebag.

[Reerun_KC]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

This is hillarious coming from the guy who had a personal vendetta against Herm, yet calls other people out for it. Nice double standard douchebag.

Sticking up for Herm? how cute.....

[milkman]

Originally Posted by el borracho

1. I didn't realize we were only going back to Cassel's acquisition. For me, the QB problem predates Cassel and ***** by quite a few years.

Yes, the QB problem in KC predates ***** by a couple of decades, but I was responding to KCBoss, who was suggesting we passed on QBs because of Cassel.

So it was time specific.

Originally Posted by -King-

They wanted to draft Clausen and wanted no part in Sam Bradford or Josh Freeman. I've learned that no one in this forum has any idea really in what to look for in a quarterback.

For the record, I stated numerous times before the draft that I wasn't sold on Clausen and wouldn't want him, that I was concerned about Bradford's transition, but thought he had the chance to be a good QB in the right situation, and never commented on Freeman because I had not watched him.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Sticking up for Herm? how cute.....

You aren't really that stupid, are you?

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Drafting a QB in the 2nd round is pretty much worthless.

[JASONSAUTO]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

History pretty much proves that second round QBs fail.

**** history.

you didnt answer my question.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

This is hillarious coming from the guy who had a personal vendetta against Herm, yet calls other people out for it. Nice double standard douchebag.

Originally Posted by milkman

You aren't really that stupid, are you?

He just likes to stir shit by posting asinine opnions that NO ONE who concerns themselves with the betterment of this team could possibly agree with much less share.

[Thig Lyfe]

Cassel's shittiness has a trickle down effect.

[58kcfan89]

Alright, y'all finally pulled me into the Cassel sucks bandwagon today. For the past 2+ years, I've been making excuses like most Chiefs fans, but the last 3 games (vs. Raiders, Ravens, today) have opened my eyes.

Zero pocket presence. Checkdown city. No accuracy on the deep pass. Staring down receivers. Failing to look off defenders. I'm tired of it. I'm all about tanking so we can upgrade the QB position, seeing as how anything more than about 6 wins would be seen as a "Cassel's doing fine" situation.

Makes you wonder how good Charlie Weis really was at his job. I don't think it was all him, but I don't think you can deny that he had a lot to do with last year, at this point.

Suck for Luck!

[Branden Albert's Huge Balls]

22/36 for 119 yards