|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
Topic Starter |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2022
Casino cash: $-8029500
|
Eagles are again attempting to get a 4th and long conversion option on kick offs
https://www.nbcsports.com/philadelph...te-onside-kick
"The onside kick proposal is very similar to one the Eagles proposed a couple years ago before it was tabled. It would basically offer an alternative to a traditional onside kick. Teams would face a 4th-and-20 from their own 20 yard line with a chance to convert and keep the ball. Here are a few key points about the proposal: • A team may elect to go for this 4th-and-20 just twice per game and must be trailing its opponent to attempt. They must notify the referee of their attempt and the ref will notify the other team. • If the offense converts, it’s a first down and normal rules apply. If the defense gets a stop, they get the ball at the spot. • If a team commits a penalty on its first try, it would not be able to change its mind and opt for a traditional kickoff. • Teams will still have the option of going for a traditional onside kick. The reason the Eagles gave for this proposal was “competitive equity and fan engagement.” Big no from me. Not just because the whole idea sucks but I can just imagine Spags inevitably opting for a blitz every time so we **** it up and give them back the ball. I know we have the best 3rd/4th and long offense but **** allowing other teams the chance to beat us because we can't get the ball back. |
Posts: 4,832
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|