ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   4 NFL Scouts Rate The Players (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=205825)

Reaper16 04-13-2009 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5665275)
I'm not gonna disagree. I hope he does well and improves. Thats not to say that he doesnt share a lot of that blame. Ryan said that he still has motivational issues. I still dont think he was a better pick than Ryan, Long, Long, or Dorsey last year. You just dont take a player who has lazy lapses on the field that high. He certainly has the talent though.

I can't disagree.

htismaqe 04-13-2009 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by melbar (Post 5665266)
I think the point most of us have made is that the value has to be measured against the other players in THIS draft. I get the concern about rushing, but again if you watch the tape most of the time he was double teamed and they ran away from him. We need a rusher, but the questions with the few 1st round rushers are more numerous where as Curry is pretty solid in every aspect and you're just not sure about 1 phase.

If you value your pick against the other players in THIS draft, then you've already diminished the value of YOUR player.

"Well, he's not great, but he's better than the rest of this heap."

Better than "bad" does not equal "good".

Chiefnj2 04-13-2009 11:50 AM

This was the compilation of the 4 scouts last year:

1. Jake Long OT UM Drafted 1st.
2. Chris Long DE Virginia drafted 2nd
3. Glen Dorsey DT LSU Drafted 5th
4. Darren McFadden RB ARK Drafted 4th
5. Vernon Gholston DE OSU Drafted 6th
6. Aqib Talib CB Kansas Drafted 20th
7. Sedrick Ellis DT USC Drafted 7th
8. Branden Albert OL Virginia Drafted 15th
9. Derrick Harvey DE Florida Drafted 8th
10. Ryan Clady OT Boise State Drafted 12th.
11. Chris Williams OT Vanderbilt Drafted 14th
12. Rashard Mendenhall RB ILL Drafted 23rd
13. Leodis McKelvin DB Troy Drafted 11th
14. Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie CB Tennessee State Drafted 16th
15. Phillip Merling DE Clemson Drafted 32nd
16. Devin Thomas WR Michigan State Drafted 34th
17. Jerod Mayo LB Tennessee Drafted 10th
18. Jeff Otah OT Pittsburgh Drafted 19th
19. Mike Jenkins CB South Florida Drafted 25th
20. Matt Ryan QB BC Taken 3rd.

16 were taken in the top 20.
2 between 20 and 25.
2 came in at 32nd, 34th.

CoMoChief 04-13-2009 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duck Dog (Post 5665182)
They were scouted they just didn't make the top 20.

And why's that? BECAUSE SANCHEZ SUCKS!!!!!!

FD 04-13-2009 12:01 PM

Apparently Jason Smith and Eugene Monroe are football players. Interesting analysis.

philfree 04-13-2009 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5665252)
I want to trade down, but since I know you're going to introduce the "we can't trade down" hypothetical like always, I'll play.

Sanchez and Stafford for sure.

I've also moved Raji out and replace him with Crabtree. So there's 3 I'd take before Curry
.

I've posted I'd like to trade down too but if that don't work out then we'll be picking at #3. The bolded part is a fair answer. It scares me paying that much guaranteed money to a guy who just had a screw put in his foot. I like Crabtree though. Of course you know how I feel about Sanchex and since we have Cassel I don't see us taking Stafford. Those guys are good trade bait though. No Raji at #3 either. To me if we can't trade down it's Curry. And I'd really like to trade down. But if we can't I think Curry will be a very good player and he has the upside of being great. I'm also really intrigued with Andre Smith as a RT prospect even though he'd be high dollar for that position. And then there's Orakpo. Who ever we pick I'l try and be open minded about it.

PhilFree:arrow:

philfree 04-13-2009 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5665307)
If you value your pick against the other players in THIS draft, then you've already diminished the value of YOUR player.

"Well, he's not great, but he's better than the rest of this heap."

Better than "bad" does not equal "good".


I'd like a more in depth explanation of that. I want to be sure I understand what you are saying and what the value of the players in the 2009 draft are measured to.


PhilFree:arrow:

htismaqe 04-13-2009 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5665407)
I've posted I'd like to trade down too but if that don't work out then we'll be picking at #3. The bolded part is a fair answer. It scares me paying that much guaranteed money to a guy who just had a screw put in his foot. I like Crabtree though. Of course you know how I feel about Sanchex and since we have Cassel I don't see us taking Stafford. Those guys are good trade bait though. No Raji at #3 either. To me if we can't trade down it's Curry. And I'd really like to trade down. But if we can't I think Curry will be a very good player and he has the upside of being great. I'm also really intrigued with Andre Smith as a RT prospect even though he'd be high dollar for that position. And then there's Orakpo.

I guess I'd rather have Curry over Orakpo (he's got bust written all over him) or another LT (I don't want to move Albert for any reason). But that's about it. I'd be inclined to take SIGNIFCANTLY less than draft chart value to trade down at this point, that's how much the top of this draft means to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5665407)
Who ever we pick I'l try and be open minded about it.

Now this I can agree with.

htismaqe 04-13-2009 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5665418)
I'd like a more in depth explanation of that. I want to be sure I understand what you are saying and what the value of the players in the 2009 draft are measured to.


PhilFree:arrow:

They HAVE to be measured to all of the drafts that preceeded them, or at least the most recent drafts that reflect the latest historical trends.

philfree 04-13-2009 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 5665497)
They HAVE to be measured to all of the drafts that preceeded them, or at least the most recent drafts that reflect the latest historical trends.


I don't think one can just ignore the actual players in the draft to make their selection. We'll find out soon enough but there's a good chance that Curry is picked in the top five of this draft. You don't think there is a chance that Curry will go in the top five? There's a pretty good chance that what happens in the top of this draft won't immulate history to a "T".


PhilFree:arrow:

htismaqe 04-13-2009 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5665550)
I don't think one can just ignore the actual players in the draft to make their selection.

I'm not suggesting anything of the sort. I'm only saying that you have to evaluate them compared to not only this draft, but previous drafts as well. If the most physically talented player in this draft were a TE or FB, would you take them in the Top 5? Because that's precisely what is being talked about here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 5665550)
We'll find out soon enough but there's a good chance that Curry is picked in the top five of this draft. You don't think there is a chance that Curry will go in the top five? There's a pretty good chance that what happens in the top of this draft won't immulate history to a "T".

I absolutely think some team will be taking him Top 5. And 4 years from now, the fans will be bitching about it, just like DJ.

Mecca 04-13-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forward Dante (Post 5665365)
Apparently Jason Smith and Eugene Monroe are football players. Interesting analysis.

I'd hope so, I mean I'd hope I wasn't drafting a chimney sweep.

And that Calvin Johnson, Joe Thomas, Pat Willis thing is mind numbing. If that guy really thinks that he's a dolt.

Chiefnj2 04-13-2009 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5665735)
I'd hope so, I mean I'd hope I wasn't drafting a chimney sweep.

And that Calvin Johnson, Joe Thomas, Pat Willis thing is mind numbing. If that guy really thinks that he's a dolt.

A LOT isn't more valuable than a WR?

Mecca 04-13-2009 03:57 PM

Depends on the WR...Calvin Johnson no, Calvin Johnson is a once in 20 years type of prospect.

If you haven't noticed the LT position is seeing alot of top prospects every year now.

JohnnyV13 04-14-2009 12:04 PM

I agree with Mecca on this one. Calvin Johnson is the sort of WR i've never seen. I mean 239 AND runs under 4.4? That's sick.

He's also got rare agility for a guy his size. To put this in perspective, CJ is 239 and Shannon Sharpe went 228.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.