Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain Man
This is directed at everyone, but NJChiefsFan's comment made me think about it.
We know that no human being is perfect, so we can't reasonably expect 100 percent accuracy and consistency on officials' calls. If we fed truth serum to officials and then interviewed them, they'd admit on some calls that they messed up. Even if they don't, a detailed review would show errors on some calls.
So recognizing that we can't find a perfect official, what's the minimum accuracy rate that's acceptable? Is it 90%? 95%? 99%? 99.0%? Assume that these are errors that aren't corrected via review.
|
It would be easier to swallow if it weren't 90% of the blown calls against one team or for another. Just sayin' man.
__________________
"Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour" Peter 5:8
"Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter's clay" Isaiah 29:16
"Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me." Revelation 3:20
|