Quote:
Originally Posted by Monticore
He lied about his trial being FDA approved, what makes you think he is qualified to run any type of trial?
Any doctor making claims about have a 100% effective drug towards any disease should set off some red flags, but the medical world still did their due diligence and like Daface said and all the studies Fish linked it came to the conclusion it didn’t make a significant difference and in some cases caused harm .
If it worked they would use it
You remind me of that lady at 46 sec
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yJD1Iw...ature=youtu.be |
He said NEAR 100% IF treated within the first 5 days.
Again....the studies that show an insignificant difference are studies of HCQ only. No one claimed to have had wild success with HCQ only. It's the zinc that is most important. HCQ is only necessary to increase intracellular zinc. Treating Covid with HCQ alone makes zero sense.
Don't condescend until you get this basic premise.
And the only studies which have shown harm were studies which used excessive doses in very late-stage treatments.
Here's an interesting tidbit from the global database of HCQ Covid studies (hcqmeta.com):
There is evidence of bias towards publishing negative results. 77% of prospective studies report positive effects, compared to 72% of retrospective studies. Studies from North America are 3.1 times more likely to report negative results than studies from the rest of the world combined, p = 0.0000000081.
46% of studies in North America reported positive effects, compared to 90% in South America, 84% in Asia, 83% in Europe, 80% in Africa and 76% in the Middle East.
Nothing to see there.