Quote:
|
Originally Posted by htismaqe
There's that double-standard again.
|
it would be a double standard if i was doing what i think your implying
i ASSume your talking about a larry johnson/Foster comparison?
i think you have me confuse with someone else again (apparently like the McCardell deal)
my complaint about Johnson is AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN primarily a complaint about picking a RB, when we didn't need a running back.
we should of pick a defensive player
i didn't say Larry johnson was a bust ... i have said that we may have the best group of running backs in the league. I told you that before.
i dont see a double standard here... i see you getting me confused with someone else's comments about larry johnson.
i think lots of people do that same around here
lazarus = negative ... so revisionists history sooner or later everybody remembers that it was me that said whatever negative comment was made.
i've made no decision about larry johnson's talent ... but i have made a decision that the chiefs picking larry johnson was a bad fuggin pick.
being redundant here to try and get my point across... and see if someone can actually remember it.
larry johnson = possible good RB
chiefs using 1st RD pick on a RB in the 2003 draft = crappy
any questions??