How Many Yards Will Deshaun Foster Rush for Sunday - Page 5

cmh6476 · 09-17-2004, 01:02 PM

against our defense...

poll forthcoming

Mr. Laz · 09-17-2004, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

There's that double-standard again.

it would be a double standard if i was doing what i think your implying

i ASSume your talking about a larry johnson/Foster comparison?

i think you have me confuse with someone else again (apparently like the McCardell deal)

my complaint about Johnson is AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN primarily a complaint about picking a RB, when we didn't need a running back.

we should of pick a defensive player

i didn't say Larry johnson was a bust ... i have said that we may have the best group of running backs in the league. I told you that before.

i dont see a double standard here... i see you getting me confused with someone else's comments about larry johnson.

i think lots of people do that same around here

lazarus = negative ... so revisionists history sooner or later everybody remembers that it was me that said whatever negative comment was made.

i've made no decision about larry johnson's talent ... but i have made a decision that the chiefs picking larry johnson was a bad fuggin pick.

being redundant here to try and get my point across... and see if someone can actually remember it.

larry johnson = possible good RB

chiefs using 1st RD pick on a RB in the 2003 draft = crappy

any questions??

htismaqe · 09-17-2004, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazarus

it would be a double standard if i was doing what i think your implying

i ASSume your talking about a larry johnson/Foster comparison?

i think you have me confuse with someone else again (apparently like the McCardell deal)

my complaint about Johnson is AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN primarily a complaint about picking a RB, when we didn't need a running back.

we should of pick a defensive player

i didn't say Larry johnson was a bust ... i have said that we may have the best group of running backs in the league. I told you that before.

i dont see a double standard here... i see you getting me confused with someone else's comments about larry johnson.

i think lots of people do that same around here

lazarus = negative ... so revisionists history sooner or later everybody remembers that it was me that said whatever negative comment was made.

i've made no decision about larry johnson's talent ... but i have made a decision that the chiefs picking larry johnson was a bad fuggin pick.

being redundant here to try and get my point across... and see if someone can actually remember it.

larry johnson = possible good RB

chiefs using 1st RD pick on a RB in the 2003 draft = crappy

any questions??

Nope, my bad. I must have confused you with someone else.

**alanm** · 09-17-2004, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

Not yet...but you know whats gonna happen...we will go anywhere from 10-6 to 12-4. We will make the playoffs based on the strength of our offense....But once we get into the playoffs and have to face a real team we will choke once again......i can see another letdown coming.

That's it. Turn in your rose colored glasses and mail me all your Chiefs gear. I'll PM my address. Just make sure you wash your shit before you box it up.

patteeu · 09-17-2004, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Foster's career long rush is TWENTY ONE yards.

In that case, all signs point toward a career afternoon for Foster this Sunday.

*edit* I see that you've covered this territory already. Nevemind. */edit*

Hammock Parties · 09-17-2004, 11:16 PM

Htismaque is right, fellas.

Throw in the fact that the Panthers have no one to stretch the field, unless you count Keary Colbert, and Our Dbs will be playing closer to the line as well.

I'm going to be pissed if Foster goes for over 120 on us.

**KcMizzou** · 09-17-2004, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBret

I'm going to be pissed if Foster goes for over 120 on us.

He won't break 80.

David. · 09-17-2004, 11:20 PM

He could run for 400 for all I care as long as we win.

htismaqe · 09-18-2004, 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBret

Htismaque is right, fellas.

Throw in the fact that the Panthers have no one to stretch the field, unless you count Keary Colbert, and Our Dbs will be playing closer to the line as well.

I'm going to be pissed if Foster goes for over 120 on us.

Please don't agree with me. Thanks.

**the Talking Can** · 09-18-2004, 06:48 AM

not sure what stats have to do with it....our D usually allows people to have career days.....that's why our defense sucks

patteeu · 09-18-2004, 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Please don't agree with me. Thanks.

Gaz · 09-18-2004, 06:55 AM

Between 50 & 100 yards; somewhere at the top of that range.

Our Defense is still raw. Add to that the loss of Holliday [not a HUGE loss, IMO] and Wesley [that’s a biggun] and the addition of Mitchell [along with some dreadful rookie mistakes], and you can see why I do not expect huge improvements in our D Sunday.

xoxo~
Gaz
Trying to be patient.

**the Talking Can** · 09-18-2004, 06:59 AM

I think we need to take baby steps....I'm less concerned with rushing yards than points...let's hold someone to 21 points, I'd consider that a huge victory (even against a wounded offense)

I want this D to show some spine and shut people down in the red zone....field goals instead of TDs, good coverage on 3rd etc....we need to see some more (well, any) 3-and-outs

Hammock Parties · 09-18-2004, 07:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Please don't agree with me. Thanks.

Heaven forbid...

**Bowser** · 09-18-2004, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gaz

Between 50 & 100 yards; somewhere at the top of that range.

Our Defense is still raw. Add to that the loss of Holliday [not a HUGE loss, IMO] and Wesley [that’s a biggun] and the addition of Mitchell [along with some dreadful rookie mistakes], and you can see why I do not expect huge improvements in our D Sunday.

xoxo~
Gaz
Trying to be patient.

Browning may be an improvement over Holliday. Holliday looked like he was sleep walking against the Donkeys, with the exception of his sack. But he wasn't even blocked on that play.

htismaqe · 09-18-2004, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser

Browning may be an improvement over Holliday. Holliday looked like he was sleep walking against the Donkeys, with the exception of his sack. But he wasn't even blocked on that play.

I really want to see Browning on the outside with Siavii starting next to Sims.

The future is NOW!

View Poll Results: ???
Blind Homer Time ... Under 50 yrds	6	5.83%
keeping it Positive 50-100	39	37.86%
Same ol, Same ol 100-150	35	33.98%
not pretty 150-200	9	8.74%
Another Hall of famer is born 200-250	6	5.83%
holy #$%^!!!! 250+	8	7.77%
Voters: 103. You may not vote on this poll

09-17-2004, 01:02 PM
cmh6476 Keep Camp Home! Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: St Joe MO Casino cash: $-1093723	How Many Yards Will Deshaun Foster Rush for Sunday against our defense... poll forthcoming
Posts: 11,023

09-17-2004, 11:16 PM	#65
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $750478	Htismaque is right, fellas. Throw in the fact that the Panthers have no one to stretch the field, unless you count Keary Colbert, and Our Dbs will be playing closer to the line as well. I'm going to be pissed if Foster goes for over 120 on us. __________________ Chiefs game films
Posts: 297,577

09-17-2004, 11:20 PM	#67
David. . Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: University of Missouri Casino cash: $10005850	He could run for 400 for all I care as long as we win.
Posts: 8,169

09-18-2004, 06:48 AM	#69
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $9122208	not sure what stats have to do with it....our D usually allows people to have career days.....that's why our defense sucks __________________ Clark Hunt: "Thank god for the Dominican pool boy"
Posts: 51,585

09-18-2004, 06:55 AM	#71
Gaz Defense Homer Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Rancho Gaz Casino cash: $10010793	Marginal improvement, at best... Between 50 & 100 yards; somewhere at the top of that range. Our Defense is still raw. Add to that the loss of Holliday [not a HUGE loss, IMO] and Wesley [that’s a biggun] and the addition of Mitchell [along with some dreadful rookie mistakes], and you can see why I do not expect huge improvements in our D Sunday. xoxo~ Gaz Trying to be patient.
Posts: 5,911

09-18-2004, 06:59 AM	#72
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $9122208	I think we need to take baby steps....I'm less concerned with rushing yards than points...let's hold someone to 21 points, I'd consider that a huge victory (even against a wounded offense) I want this D to show some spine and shut people down in the red zone....field goals instead of TDs, good coverage on 3rd etc....we need to see some more (well, any) 3-and-outs __________________ Clark Hunt: "Thank god for the Dominican pool boy"
Posts: 51,585