Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
Why are you even positing this? There is no way anyone could look at this team and claim that a 3-4 is in its best long term interests.
3-4 NT is the hardest position in the NFL to find bar none. We have no talent in the front 7 designed for a 3-4.
This is the exact opposite of what Herm did in New York...took a veteran team with great cover corners and a solid NT and turned it into a Tampa 2 team, and the defense got progressively worse because of it.
If you want to run the 3-4 as a look in a certain package, fine, but we should absolutely not hire anyone, DC or HC, who is a 3-4 disciple unless you are 100% certain that Dorsey is a bust, and there is no way you can know that right now.
And he's not "a player". He's a top 5 draft pick. This is about as intelligent as drafting Sam Bradford and having him run the Al Davis offense.
|
You should get your resume to Clark quick, because you ****ing know EVERYTHING - yet your reading comprehension really needs work.
What part of "experienced in 43, 34 and 46" do you not understand? I've only mentioned it FOUR or FIVE times.
He worked for the Ravens AS they made the switch from 43 to 34. IIRC, they ran the 43 under him at OU in the late 90's.
If you don't like the guy as a candidate, just say so.
But to claim he's a 34 "disciple" and is inflexible to run any other defense just because he runs a 34 NOW makes you look like a jackass.
I'm not sure WTF happened to you recently, but you've gone from solid, open-minded football talk, to know-it-all-one who sucks the penis in a matter of a few months.