Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
I don't agree with that.
I look at it from the other perspective: I can't friggin' believe that the Chiefs are even IN these games given the lack of talent on the right side of the offensive line, at WR, at LB and especially at DE. Yet other people think Herm needs to go in spite of these blatant deficiencies.
The Chiefs could have won in NY (I was there and said "Oh, shit!" when they punted with 5:35 left).
The would have beat Tampa without injuries to DJ and Flowers.
They may have won in San Diego had it not been for the missed extra point.
They may have beat San Diego this past weekend had it not been for Bowe's mishap and two misses FG's.
They may have beat Denver in Denver but the defense couldn't hold.
But they didn't and people want him fired, as if any other coach could have coached around the lack of talent and depth. As I said earlier, it's not like the Chiefs have the talent and depth of the Cowboys, Giants or Panthers.
I don't get it.
|
No one is claiming they have the talent of Dallas, New York or Carolina, Dane.
They obviously HAVE enough talent to be in these games, and it's painfully obvious to ANYONE watching that piss-poor coaching decisions are turning potential wins into losses.
Other coaches wouldn't be playing not-to-lose.
Other coaches wouldn't be so reckless with time management.
Other coaches wouldn't employ an OC who's 2nd half playcalling is so predictable, that the other team and the freaking FANS watching on TV are calling out what's going to happen before the snap.
So sorry, I have to call bullshit when you say another coach couldn't have coached around this so-called lack of talent and depth.