Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud
So out of 27 picks (three rounds, 9 years), he chose three wide receivers, which equates to 11%.
He also turned around and traded one of the three.
I think it's highly unlikely he values Bryant more than Okung, Berry, Baluga, Williams or Clausen, especially given that he's a poor interview, has questionable character and didn't play in 2009.
|
I agree that some of those would be valued higher but Berry, Okung & Williams weren't options based on the criteria I stated. So out of the people you mentioned that basically left Bulaga & Clausen and I don't think Clausen is an option for Pioli.
I agreed with you that Bryant isn't the "likely" pick, fact is I think they'd reach for Tate over Bryant but he also wasn't an option in this scenario.
If you'd have said "Pioli's history indicates that he does not value skilled players in the first round", I wouldn't disagree. You didn't though.
He has picked 25 times in the first 3 rounds, between here and New England. 6 of those times he picked some fashion of a receiver. Each of the TE's were right around 250 or less and were all looked at primarily as receivers. 6/25 = 24%.
As I already said, you were right about D-linemen. He's all over them in the first round and I've said before I think we'll actually end up trading down or reaching on Dan Williams.
The "first three rounds":
O-linemen = 3/25 = 12%
Linebackers = 2/25 = 8%
Your assertion that "Pioli's history indicates that he does not value skilled players in the first three rounds (Maroney aside - who's a failure).
Pioli is far more likely to draft offensive line, defensive line or
linebacker." = 2/3 FAIL.
I would hope to hell he would value Berry higher than Bryant, but both he and Okung were gone under this scenario.