Quote:
Originally Posted by keg in kc
No, you're not answering his question.
His question is at what point does positional value overtake individual player value.
I hesitate to paraphrase, but his thinking is that no LT will ever have 1:1 value. So he will always choose a "lesser" player at another position over the top LT.
Meaning to him, if he agrees for the sake of argument that Geno is not a franchise QB, he would still take him over any of the tackle prospects, despite their (again, theoretical for the sake of argument) higher grades.
So basically a QB with a 91 rating is more valuable than a LT with a 98.
(This happens to be my thinking as well)
His point was at what point to you agree with that, if ever? And then further, with which positions would that be true?
Is that a fair characterization SNR?
|
We have our QB. Our coach wanted him. Bad. And it's obvious that he thinks that it's not a need.
They are trying to win NOW. And LT is a huge piece to Reid's offense.