Brodie Croyle. . . What did he show today? - Page 8

KC kid · 12-30-2007, 09:08 PM

This game was so boring. I passed out. Up til when I fell asleep, Croyle was terrible. Did he do anything?

Mecca · 12-31-2007, 10:33 PM

It's Russells rookie year in which he had no training camp....did Brodie Croyle play last year...

Croyle has been in the league a year longer than Russell...

What I meant by that comment about building is this, if you take a QB first that means you build your offense to be the elite side of your team,you don't ignore your defense but you build for that QB.

Also my other comment you didn't get, The Raiders had the balls to take the QB. It appears many here and the Chiefs organization wouldn't have those same balls...with a top 5 pick.

It works like this, it all starts at QB. You give Croyle another year and have to draft another QB, you set everything back 3 years. QB is where it all starts without that you'll never be great, even if that means drafting a QB every 2 years till you get that guy.

**ChiefGator** · 12-31-2007, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

What I meant by that comment about building is this, if you take a QB first that means you build your offense to be the elite side of your team,you don't ignore your defense but you build for that QB.

Damn, you been a Chiefs fan too long. You try to build a balanced team, not one elite side. I wouldn't pass up McFadden if I'm Oakland, but they have a nucleus for a good defense, albiet one that is getting older.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Also my other comment you didn't get, The Raiders had the balls to take the QB. It appears many here and the Chiefs organization wouldn't have those same balls...with a top 5 pick.

Raiders had the balls to draft the WRONG qb. Time will prove this I think. Al is too in love with the long ball. (no scrodum jokes please)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

You give Croyle another year and have to draft another QB, you set everything back 3 years. QB is where it all starts without that you'll never be great, even if that means drafting a QB every 2 years till you get that guy.

Too many other pressing needs on this team, and not enough value at QB where we will be picking. I expect we will draft a qb in a later round though.

Every QB starter does not need to be a high first rounder. Time to pull out the tape on Dilfer's super bowl.

12-30-2007, 09:08 PM
KC kid Veteran Join Date: Oct 2003 Casino cash: $10004940	Brodie Croyle. . . What did he show today? This game was so boring. I passed out. Up til when I fell asleep, Croyle was terrible. Did he do anything?
Posts: 1,374

12-31-2007, 10:33 PM	#106
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $2207050	It's Russells rookie year in which he had no training camp....did Brodie Croyle play last year... Croyle has been in the league a year longer than Russell... What I meant by that comment about building is this, if you take a QB first that means you build your offense to be the elite side of your team,you don't ignore your defense but you build for that QB. Also my other comment you didn't get, The Raiders had the balls to take the QB. It appears many here and the Chiefs organization wouldn't have those same balls...with a top 5 pick. It works like this, it all starts at QB. You give Croyle another year and have to draft another QB, you set everything back 3 years. QB is where it all starts without that you'll never be great, even if that means drafting a QB every 2 years till you get that guy.
Posts: 111,215