Gholston theory

['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by BigDaddyChief

Alot of you guys seem to know quite a bit about Gholston and these other prospects, but the fact of the matter is non of us are pro scouts and even those guys don't know how a player will be in the next level. I do however know about the Chiefs and I have a few thoughts on some of the points I read in this thread: Gholston may be a physical freak, but do we really want someone who takes more plays off than he doesn't! Chris Long sounds like a safe bet (if he's there), with a motor that doesn't quit first play to last. Hmmm, sounds like another great player I love. Speaking of Jared, people in here saying he's the same size as Gholston. Uhhh...no. Jared's 6'6", and he was 280, I don't care what they listed him at. Lastly, does anyone else in here think we should take Matt Ryan if possible? Before you jump down my throat let me explain why we should:
A) He's the right value at #5
B) He's physically gifted and a prototypical size
C) We haven't had a good franchise QB since Len Dawson (Joe doesn't count, Trent was pretty good but benefited from system)
D) We haven't had the opportunity to draft a potentially great QB in a long time
E) He has a great head on his shoulders. I've been following his blog and interviews. Great attitude, smart kid. A good mind is the most important attribute for a QB
F) QB is the most important position in professional sports! Jury's still out on Brodie

1) n00b
2) Allen played at 265 last year
3) Gholston takes plays off but apparently has a "relentless" "outstanding" and "superb" motor. Ok...
4) Die, n00b, die.