Chiefs 3-3 after six games. - Page 7

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 09:37 AM

I am going to post this now, because I think there will be a lot of optimism following the Raiders game.

I have watched the Ravens game a few times. The more I watch it, the better I feel about this team.

The Chiefs will win against the Raiders. Not just win, but be in control of the game.

Basically, Oakland's offense is not balanced enough to stretch the Chiefs defense like last week.

Now, that is just one win.... after which we go to Philly, then have the Giants at home, then the Cowboys and then the Redskins.

So, with those quality teams, how can I predict the Chiefs winning two of them.

Okay, well lets look at the Eagles first. The Eagles looked great against Carolina. But, that was after Delhome shat himself. He began to hold the ball longer as the game went along. I don't think the defense is 'that' good.

The Eagles like to bring the blitz alot, but are not huge up front. I think the Chiefs can get the run game going. I don't think McNabb will be back and I think the Eagles will try to work Vick in too much. It will be a detriment to the offense.

Chiefs have a much better shot at that game than if they had McNabb.

Even still, I am predicting this as a loss.

Next up is the Giants at home. As much as I would like to spin this as a win.... I can't. The Giants are a great team. The Chiefs put up a good fight because it is at home, but I can't see them pulling this game out.

So, loss again. So far I am not looking too good.

Luckily.... we have the Cowboys coming in. The Cowboys will be playing their second straight road game. It will be a high scoring game. But the Chiefs will pull it out as the Cowboys look towards their bye week and take the Chiefs lightly.

So, looking a little better at 2-3.

Next up: Washington Redskins. Chiefs catch the Skins in between two conference games. The game before is Carolina. But, more importantly, the game the following week is Philly.

Chiefs won't put up a ton of points, but won't allow many either. Luckily Clinton Portis is on the tail end of his career and NOT playing behing a great Broncos line.

Campbell won't get it done in front of the home crowd and the Chiefs pull out the victory.

.......

Or, the Chiefs could be 0-6..... WTF do I know, I thought Sanchez was Pennington at best and he pulls a freaking Joe Montana in Houston (exageration intended)

KCrockaholic · 09-17-2009, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

I would say the Ravens are better than the Bengals just because they have a better DL, OL, and Ray Lewis and Ed Reed. The Bengals are better everywhere else though.

Im done with this conversation.

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

No. We will go 3-1 against that division. We have the rest of the AFC North at home.

Wow, the rest of the AFC North is at home....see, and I thought you had two at home and two away.... that seems like a competetive advantage to me.

Quesadilla Joe · 09-17-2009, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

Wow, the rest of the AFC North is at home....see, and I thought you had two at home and two away.... that seems like a competetive advantage to me.

My bad. I thought the Baltimore game was at home.

Quesadilla Joe · 09-17-2009, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Chad Johnson is every bit as good as Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald?

Die, dumbass.

If Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald had Ryan Fitzpatrick throwing them the ball last year instead of Tom Brady and Kurt Warner then I guess you would understand.

keg in kc · 09-17-2009, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

If Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald had Ryan Fitzpatrick throwing them the ball last year instead of Tom Brady and Kurt Warner then I guess you would understand.

Yeah, Tom Brady had a great year.

Wait, what?

Quesadilla Joe · 09-17-2009, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

Yeah, Tom Brady had a great year.

Wait, what?

Matt Cassel is better than Ryan Fitzpatrick.

**RealSNR** · 09-17-2009, 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

If Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald had Ryan Fitzpatrick throwing them the ball last year instead of Tom Brady and Kurt Warner then I guess you would understand.

Shut the **** up. Watch Randy Moss and Larry Fitzgerald play and you'll see that even with great QBs there's a reason why they're some of the most talented WRs to ever play this game. Ochocinco doesn't come ****ing close to what they can do.

bowener · 09-17-2009, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SensibleChiefsfan

What about the Cowboys is great to you? Seriously.

If they had a better coach, then perhaps, but otherwise this is a talented team that underachieves and loses focus.

They lost five of their road games last year, INCLUDING the game against the Rams.

Demarcus Ware.

He will conquer Alberts like Cortez conquered the Yucatan, and he will eat Cassel's heart too...

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-17-2009, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones

We'll be 0-6. Just like we were going to lose last week's game by 30 points.

A loss is a loss, regardless of the score.

The NFL doesn't award extra points for being close.

**RealSNR** · 09-17-2009, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener

Demarcus Ware.

He will conquer Alberts like Cortez conquered the Yucatan, and he will eat Cassel's heart too...

Who the hell is "Alberts"?

Pioli Zombie · 09-17-2009, 12:08 PM

As Chris Rock would say "Are you out of your mind?????"
Posted via Mobile Device

htismaqe · 09-17-2009, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

A loss is a loss, regardless of the score.

The NFL doesn't award extra points for being close.

They also don't adjust scores to account for yardage.

The whole argument goes both ways. They played poorly on both sides of the ball. And yet they did JUST enough to stay in it until almost the end. Good? Bad? I don't know. It is what it is.

**DaneMcCloud** · 09-17-2009, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

They also don't adjust scores to account for yardage.

The whole argument goes both ways. They played poorly on both sides of the ball. And yet they did JUST enough to stay in it until almost the end. Good? Bad? I don't know. It is what it is.

My point was aimed directly at Mic's assertion that they didn't "lose by 30 points".

Had it not been for the blocked punt for a TD (very rare) or DJ's interception return to the goal line, setting up a TD, it would have been 28 points.

But that's neither here or there: A loss is a loss.

We've already discussed the merits of the Chiefs play this past week and now it's in the books.

It's Raider time!

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-17-2009, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

My point was aimed directly at Mic's assertion that they didn't "lose by 30 points".

Had it not been for the blocked punt for a TD (very rare) or DJ's interception return to the goal line, setting up a TD, it would have been 28 points.

But that's neither here or there: A loss is a loss.

We've already discussed the merits of the Chiefs play this past week and now it's in the books.

It's Raider time!

This.

SenselessChiefsFan · 09-17-2009, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener

Demarcus Ware.

He will conquer Alberts like Cortez conquered the Yucatan, and he will eat Cassel's heart too...

Demarcus Ware ain't sh... nevermind.

09-17-2009, 09:37 AM
SenselessChiefsFan MVP Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $10005450	3-3 after six games. I am going to post this now, because I think there will be a lot of optimism following the Raiders game. I have watched the Ravens game a few times. The more I watch it, the better I feel about this team. The Chiefs will win against the Raiders. Not just win, but be in control of the game. Basically, Oakland's offense is not balanced enough to stretch the Chiefs defense like last week. Now, that is just one win.... after which we go to Philly, then have the Giants at home, then the Cowboys and then the Redskins. So, with those quality teams, how can I predict the Chiefs winning two of them. Okay, well lets look at the Eagles first. The Eagles looked great against Carolina. But, that was after Delhome shat himself. He began to hold the ball longer as the game went along. I don't think the defense is 'that' good. The Eagles like to bring the blitz alot, but are not huge up front. I think the Chiefs can get the run game going. I don't think McNabb will be back and I think the Eagles will try to work Vick in too much. It will be a detriment to the offense. Chiefs have a much better shot at that game than if they had McNabb. Even still, I am predicting this as a loss. Next up is the Giants at home. As much as I would like to spin this as a win.... I can't. The Giants are a great team. The Chiefs put up a good fight because it is at home, but I can't see them pulling this game out. So, loss again. So far I am not looking too good. Luckily.... we have the Cowboys coming in. The Cowboys will be playing their second straight road game. It will be a high scoring game. But the Chiefs will pull it out as the Cowboys look towards their bye week and take the Chiefs lightly. So, looking a little better at 2-3. Next up: Washington Redskins. Chiefs catch the Skins in between two conference games. The game before is Carolina. But, more importantly, the game the following week is Philly. Chiefs won't put up a ton of points, but won't allow many either. Luckily Clinton Portis is on the tail end of his career and NOT playing behing a great Broncos line. Campbell won't get it done in front of the home crowd and the Chiefs pull out the victory. ....... Or, the Chiefs could be 0-6..... WTF do I know, I thought Sanchez was Pennington at best and he pulls a freaking Joe Montana in Houston (exageration intended)
Posts: 5,540

09-17-2009, 12:08 PM	#101
Pioli Zombie Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: olathe,kansas Casino cash: $10004900	As Chris Rock would say "Are you out of your mind?????" Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 11,077