I am afraid that Haley might have lost the team today.

[SenselessChiefsFan]

With the Chiefs trailing huge, the Chiefs went into a shell. It appeared that he quit calling plays trying to win.

That combined with his arrogance, and hardass attituded towards everyone...... he could have a very, very short shelf life.

I cannot believe how conservative that game was called. I understand protecting the QB... but you have give yourself a chance to win the game.

My biggest gripe about Herm was the conservative play calling.... and Haley has made him look like Al Saunders.

It is hard to keep a team from giving up when the head coach calls a game like he gave up midway through the third quarter.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

how do YOU differentiate? YOU are both at the same time.

Not bad.

For a dumb ****.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Where did you say that? Look in your own post.

If what is reported is any different than what actually happened, then they are ****ing lying.

You'd rather bury your head in the sand and think that Petro, Whitlock, et al are lying, skewing, whatever you want to call it - rather than use your brain and realize that if they were doing what you claimed, they'd be fired as journalists.

You're claiming neither of them have any journalistic integrity.

I'm calling BS - neither are going to risk their job and reputation over the things that you're disputing.

You are one stupid mother****er. Who would KNOW if what they are saying is true or not? WHO?

oh and i never said that they HAD to be lying to have an agenda. read that post again. i said an agenda will make someone skew a story to make it sound different. happens all the time. you leave out some words, move some around and you have all the basics of the story but it sounds totally different than what ACTUALLY happened. If YOU dont think it happens in journalism then you sir are VERY naive, but i wouldnt doubt that you have lived a life in a glass box just gazing out on the perfect world around you

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by billay

No shit but people here were saying how he was good and how Arizona didnt have much more talent then the Chiefs.

I don't recall anybody suggesting Pendergast was "good".

As for the talent, there were people here trying to suggest that Arizona's defense was loaded with top-tier talent and the only thing holding them back was Clancy.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

I don't recall anybody suggesting Pendergast was "good".

As for the talent, there were people here trying to suggest that Arizona's defense was loaded with top-tier talent and the only thing holding them back was Clancy.

Meh. They promoted from within as opposed to trying to secure a name.

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

You are one stupid mother****er. Who would KNOW if what they are saying is true or not? WHO?

oh and i never said that they HAD to be lying to have an agenda. read that post again. i said an agenda will make someone skew a story to make it sound different. happens all the time. you leave out some words, move some around and you have all the basics of the story but it sounds totally different than what ACTUALLY happened. If YOU dont think it happens in journalism then you sir are VERY naive, but i wouldnt doubt that you have lived a life in a glass box just gazing out on the perfect world around you

THAT'S LYING, YOU CARBON MONOXIDE BREATHING ****STICK.

NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.

EMBELLISHMENT = NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.

SKEWING A STORY = NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

People can't have an agenda without flat-out lying in the process?

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

having an agenda WILL* make someone skew a story to make it sound different than what ACTUALLY happen

*Caps emphasis courtesy of the author

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

THAT'S LYING, YOU CARBON MONOXIDE BREATHING ****STICK.

NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.

EMBELLISHMENT = NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.

SKEWING A STORY = NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.






*Caps emphasis courtesy of the author

Perhaps you would like to borrow 'Sauto Discipline Stick'?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

You are one stupid mother****er. Who would KNOW if what they are saying is true or not? WHO?

oh and i never said that they HAD to be lying to have an agenda. read that post again. i said an agenda will make someone skew a story to make it sound different. happens all the time. you leave out some words, move some around and you have all the basics of the story but it sounds totally different than what ACTUALLY happened. If YOU dont think it happens in journalism then you sir are VERY naive, but i wouldnt doubt that you have lived a life in a glass box just gazing out on the perfect world around you

Sauto, Sauto, Sauto.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

THAT'S LYING, YOU CARBON MONOXIDE BREATHING ****STICK.

NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.

EMBELLISHMENT = NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.

SKEWING A STORY = NOT THE TRUTH = LYING.






*Caps emphasis courtesy of the author

Nice to see that you are still sucking off hamas, or are too stupid to come up with something original.

and i will stand by my statement. it's not lying if you just change around the words to make it seem like what you want it to say. Sorry if you and your little brain cant figure that out. happens all the time in news articles. and in an OPINION, again OPINION piece there isnt the same level of scrutiny on what you are writing. Hell he writes about fictional stuff all the time.