|
![]() |
#2 |
▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓
Join Date: Jan 2009
Casino cash: $-1384257
|
Good. Was an idiotic rule.
__________________
🏁 |
Posts: 65,471
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Supporter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Who knows?
Casino cash: $-934116
|
ABOUT ****ING TIME.
|
Posts: 88,578
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓
Join Date: Jan 2009
Casino cash: $-1384257
|
BTW... there were a bunch of tuck rules last year. More than I'd ever seen before. Wonder why that is.
__________________
🏁 |
Posts: 65,471
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2011
Casino cash: $5546085
|
That was the biggest, most made up ****ing rule in the history of the game. I hate the Faid almost as much as I hate the donks -and I really hate the donks -but the inmates should've won that game.
|
Posts: 5,831
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Everybody Lies.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue
Casino cash: $-1909887
|
Good. Now a fumble is a fumble and a pass attempt is a pass attempt. Logic finally prevails.
|
Posts: 17,847
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
The man you could post like.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Casino cash: $-1410345
|
Nice.
|
Posts: 42,085
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Bono & Grbac wasn't enough
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sioux City, IA
Casino cash: $9273829
|
Quote:
Thank You Bill Clinton!!!
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Advertise here: $19.99 a month |
|
Posts: 40,879
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Mahomes Dynasty
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
Casino cash: $7672254
|
refs were paid off that game....even if it was against OAK...I'm totally convinced of that.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 39,245
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2011
Casino cash: $5546085
|
|
Posts: 5,831
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Casino cash: $-1406658
|
Good. Now, they need to change the continuation rule for receivers...
|
Posts: 5,186
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓
Join Date: Jan 2009
Casino cash: $-1384257
|
?
__________________
🏁 |
Posts: 65,471
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
It Goes On
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lees Summit
Casino cash: $10026331
|
Great!
Because there's definitely a clear delineation between when the ball is being tucked and when the arm is still going forward! Judgment calls, FTW!!! |
Posts: 18,295
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Casino cash: $10005067
|
The rule change doesn't really change anything...
The Tuck rule is a bit of a misnomer; it's really more like "forward-arm movement rule." Why? Cause the QB's arm has to be moving forward for the rule to be in effect. So Brady's arm was moving forward as he was attempting to "tuck" the ball away. Hence, it's a fumble. The moment the arm *stops* moving - and the "tuck" is completed? It's a fumble. The whole reason the rule existed was so a ref didn't have to make a subjective decision as to whether or not the QBs arm was moving forward in an attempt to thrown or tuck. But the arm still has to be moving. Brady's was. Incomplete. So, nothing has changed....unless they are now supporting subjective calls. BTW - Lol @ people who think refs were paid. |
Posts: 99
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Casino cash: $10005067
|
|
Posts: 99
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|