Newest Bracketology: KU #5 seed, TX #1

**banyon** · 02:14 PM

bracket looks like this:

Greensboro
(1) DUKE (25-1)
(16) ALBANY (16-9) / Amer East

(8) Cincinnati (17-9)
(9) Kentucky (17-9)

San Diego
(5) LSU (17-7)
(12) UAB (18-5)

(4) KANSAS (18-6)
(13) WISC.-MILW. (17-8) / Horizon

Dayton
(6) North Carolina (17-6)
(11) Arkansas (17-8)

(3) Pittsburgh (20-4)
(14) MURRAY ST (19-5) / OVC

Dayton
(7) Washington (20-5)
(10) So. Illinois (18-8)

(2) Ohio State (19-4)
(15) IUPUI (16-7) / Mid-Con
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/bracketology
________________________________________________

moves up one spot to a #4 seed. Wow. I thought we'd have to beat Texas to get that high. Now we have LSU as 2nd round opponent instead of G. Washington. Probably a better team for us to match up with IMHO. But I really like the benefit of moving up one seed in the 1st round. Now we draw Wisc-Milwaukee instead of UAB. That's much better. Usually the worst seed an at large team will get is a 12, so as a 4 we'd be guaranteed a conference champ, which is usually a little easier. Still in San Diego. Texas and Memphis still get the Dallas pod. Still in the Duke bracket. Oh well.

**banyon** · 02-06-2006, 07:03 PM

Jack Harry is pissed on "the Spot" b/c

isn't ranked. That's silly. We beat a lower tier ranked team (OK) at home. Yeah Colorado should've dropped out, but LSU still should've been ahead of us.

**Dunit35** · 02-06-2006, 07:05 PM

Hopfeully KU pulls it out and makes the tourny.

DJJasonp · 02-06-2006, 07:10 PM

I dont want any piece of Villanova....they're going to be a tough out come tourney time.

I wouldnt mind taking on Duke. I'd like to see Chalmers on Reddick.....

LiL stumppy · 02-06-2006, 07:14 PM

those bastereds

FloridaMan88 · 02-06-2006, 07:15 PM

That is a pretty loaded bracket, especially towards the bottom. Teams like Kansas, Kentucky, Wichita St, George Mason, Nevada, Maryland, and Manhattan all dangerous lower seeds in that region

**Bearcat** · 02-06-2006, 07:30 PM

I think if they finish strong, they would be deserving of a #5 or #6... between #17-24 overall. As said in another thread, it'll be a great March, because there are no expectations.

I hate ESPN for loving Kentucky so much... they are not one of the top 35 teams in the nation. After KU smacked them around, it was all about "the Kentucky loss"... and even after talking about how they barely beat Iona and Central Florida at home, they would say they had a good chance of getting in. They have the same chance as KU to get better and prove they belong before selection Sunday, but they haven't done it yet. Teams shouldn't get in because they're KU or UK, no matter what the fan base or ESPN says.

htismaqe · 02-06-2006, 07:34 PM

Frankly, this bracketology sucks.

Iowa is currently 6th in the RPI and all alone in 1st place atop the Big 10 (highest conference RPI among all conferences). They've also played more RPI Top 50's than almost anyone, and have a winning record against them.

I'm not saying they should be a #1 or even #2 seed, but having them as a #4 is ridiculous.

**banyon** · 02-06-2006, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJJasonp

I dont want any piece of Villanova....they're going to be a tough out come tourney time.

I wouldnt mind taking on Duke. I'd like to see Chalmers on Reddick.....

Nova is too guard-oriented without Curtis Sumpter. It's too bad they lost him, or they'd probably be #1 right now. Without him tough, they are prone to an off-shooting night. They'll lose a couple of more games in the Big East. I'd sure rather face them than Duke, although neither is an easy task.

HolmeZz · 02-06-2006, 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Frankly, this bracketology sucks.

Iowa is currently 6th in the RPI and all alone in 1st place atop the Big 10 (highest conference RPI among all conferences). They've also played more RPI Top 50's than almost anyone, and have a winning record against them.

I'm not saying they should be a #1 or even #2 seed, but having them as a #4 is ridiculous.

I don't think they're better than any of the 3 seeds.

htismaqe · 02-06-2006, 07:39 PM

They've already beaten Illinois (#2) once and they're better than LSU (#3).

**banyon** · 02-06-2006, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

They've already beaten Illinois (#2) once and they're better than LSU (#3).

I was about to blast your

lovin', but then I looked at their schedule and decided I couldn't back that up. They have beaten some pretty good teams.

IMO,

Quality Wins: Kentucky, N.C. State, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio St., Michigan

Bad Losses: @Iowa St (by 12); @Michigan St (by 30)

Quality Wins: @West Va, Tennessee, Alabama

Bad Losses: Houston (good Loss? @ UCONN by 1)

After reviewing the resumes, I believe you just may be right about these two teams.

HolmeZz · 02-06-2006, 08:08 PM

I wasn't talking about resumes. I was stating I don't think they're better than any of the 3 seeds.

**banyon** · 02-06-2006, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolmeZz

I wasn't talking about resumes. I was stating I don't think they're better than any of the 3 seeds.

Yeah, but tourney resume or not,

has been more consistent against better competition. Head to head, Iowa might lose to LSU, because they don't really match up too well with Glen Davis. But against the tournament field, I think there are more teams that I could see Iowa beating than LSU.

tk13 · 02-06-2006, 08:19 PM

Yeah Iowa probably deserves to be higher, but as tough as the Big Ten is there's still a lot of time for teams to make a big move up or down.

I'd like to see that Washington DC bracket come to fruition, that'd be one tough bracket.

02-06-2006, 07:02 PM
banyon Supporter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Hermosa, SD Casino cash: $10176551	New Bracketology Out:2/20 KU #4 Seed bracket looks like this: Greensboro (1) DUKE (25-1) (16) ALBANY (16-9) / Amer East (8) Cincinnati (17-9) (9) Kentucky (17-9) San Diego (5) LSU (17-7) (12) UAB (18-5) (4) KANSAS (18-6) (13) WISC.-MILW. (17-8) / Horizon Dayton (6) North Carolina (17-6) (11) Arkansas (17-8) (3) Pittsburgh (20-4) (14) MURRAY ST (19-5) / OVC Dayton (7) Washington (20-5) (10) So. Illinois (18-8) (2) Ohio State (19-4) (15) IUPUI (16-7) / Mid-Con http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/bracketology ________________________________________________ moves up one spot to a #4 seed. Wow. I thought we'd have to beat Texas to get that high. Now we have LSU as 2nd round opponent instead of G. Washington. Probably a better team for us to match up with IMHO. But I really like the benefit of moving up one seed in the 1st round. Now we draw Wisc-Milwaukee instead of UAB. That's much better. Usually the worst seed an at large team will get is a 12, so as a 4 we'd be guaranteed a conference champ, which is usually a little easier. Still in San Diego. Texas and Memphis still get the Dallas pod. Still in the Duke bracket. Oh well. Last edited by banyon; 02-20-2006 at 02:14 PM..
Posts: 44,355

02-06-2006, 07:03 PM	#2
banyon Supporter Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Hermosa, SD Casino cash: $10176551	Jack Harry is pissed on "the Spot" b/c isn't ranked. That's silly. We beat a lower tier ranked team (OK) at home. Yeah Colorado should've dropped out, but LSU still should've been ahead of us. __________________ “When war breaks out people say: 'It won't last, it's too stupid.' And war is certainly too stupid, but that doesn't prevent It from lasting.” ~Albert Camus, The Plague.
Posts: 44,355

02-06-2006, 07:10 PM	#4
DJJasonp My work speaks for itself!!! Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: So Cal Casino cash: $-1904800	I dont want any piece of Villanova....they're going to be a tough out come tourney time. I wouldnt mind taking on Duke. I'd like to see Chalmers on Reddick..... __________________ Its easier to fool a man, than to convince a man he's been fooled.
Posts: 13,984

02-06-2006, 07:14 PM	#5
LiL stumppy 62-21 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: St. Louis, MO Casino cash: $9913684	those bastereds __________________ I'm just cakn partna
Posts: 4,377

02-06-2006, 07:30 PM	#7
Bearcat Would an idiot do that? Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Arizona Casino cash: $-1085069	I think if they finish strong, they would be deserving of a #5 or #6... between #17-24 overall. As said in another thread, it'll be a great March, because there are no expectations. I hate ESPN for loving Kentucky so much... they are not one of the top 35 teams in the nation. After KU smacked them around, it was all about "the Kentucky loss"... and even after talking about how they barely beat Iona and Central Florida at home, they would say they had a good chance of getting in. They have the same chance as KU to get better and prove they belong before selection Sunday, but they haven't done it yet. Teams shouldn't get in because they're KU or UK, no matter what the fan base or ESPN says. __________________
Posts: 59,626

02-06-2006, 07:05 PM	#3
Dunit35 Keepin it Real Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Oklahoma Casino cash: $-2322955	Hopfeully KU pulls it out and makes the tourny.
Posts: 10,507

02-06-2006, 07:15 PM	#6
FloridaMan88 Mahomes: We Are All Witnesses Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Miami, FL Casino cash: $-757094	That is a pretty loaded bracket, especially towards the bottom. Teams like Kansas, Kentucky, Wichita St, George Mason, Nevada, Maryland, and Manhattan all dangerous lower seeds in that region
Posts: 50,261

02-06-2006, 07:34 PM	#8
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $8099900	Frankly, this bracketology sucks. Iowa is currently 6th in the RPI and all alone in 1st place atop the Big 10 (highest conference RPI among all conferences). They've also played more RPI Top 50's than almost anyone, and have a winning record against them. I'm not saying they should be a #1 or even #2 seed, but having them as a #4 is ridiculous.
Posts: 104,421

02-06-2006, 07:39 PM	#11
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $8099900	They've already beaten Illinois (#2) once and they're better than LSU (#3).
Posts: 104,421

02-06-2006, 08:08 PM	#13
HolmeZz i guess its bittersweet poetry Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: NeW HaVeN, CT Casino cash: $10004900	I wasn't talking about resumes. I was stating I don't think they're better than any of the 3 seeds.
Posts: 16,520

02-06-2006, 08:19 PM	#15
tk13 ... Join Date: Nov 2001 Casino cash: $-1907500	Yeah Iowa probably deserves to be higher, but as tough as the Big Ten is there's still a lot of time for teams to make a big move up or down. I'd like to see that Washington DC bracket come to fruition, that'd be one tough bracket.
Posts: 56,722