Cut Kennison...Sign Porter???

**petegz28** · 07-28-2006, 07:53 AM

Ok I may be dreaming but what would that, could that possibly happen?

Eleazar · 07-28-2006, 07:57 AM

Sure it could happen.

If the raiders decide not to trade him for something of value and instead cut him to get nothing in return, and absorb the cap hit from the contract extension he just signed last year.

**DaKCMan AP** · 07-28-2006, 07:59 AM

I believe Porter is a very good WR.

However, we cannot sign him because he is under contract.

Additionally, why would we cut Kennison? He's in camp doing everything he should be doing.

Hound333 · 07-28-2006, 07:59 AM

No, I would rather have Kennison. Porter seemed to throw a little fit last year when they signed Moss because he wasn't gonna be the "man" anymore. Although it is fun to take former raiders (I refuse to capitalize that word) and send them to the pro-bowl.

**Fire Me Boy!** · 07-28-2006, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hound333

No, I would rather have Kennison. Porter seemed to throw a little fit last year when they signed Moss because he wasn't gonna be the "man" anymore. Although it is fun to take former raiders (I refuse to capitalize that word) and send them to the pro-bowl.

I could be wrong, but if I remember correctly, he didn't sign his extension until AFTER they had signed Moss.

**petegz28** · 07-28-2006, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

I believe Porter is a very good WR.

However, we cannot sign him because he is under contract.

Additionally, why would we cut Kennison? He's in camp doing everything he should be doing.

If Kennison holds out then I say cut him.

|Zach| · 07-28-2006, 08:15 AM

Terrible.

shaneo69 · 07-28-2006, 09:06 AM

I think we should trade Kennison for Lelie. I hear the rat is a big fan of Eddie's.

StcChief · 07-28-2006, 10:52 AM

Give Eddie a little more money. I think he has a good point as the #1 reciever. And has put up good numbers
With all that was saved (TRich), now Roaf,

King Carl will buck up.

InChiefsHeaven · 07-28-2006, 10:56 AM

Keep Kennison. We don't need any more bullshit right now. Let's keep the roster as solid as we can on the Offensive side...

...good Lord 'yall...we've lost Priest, TRich, Welbourn, Roaf...we don't need any more bullshit...

Hound333 · 07-28-2006, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy!

I could be wrong, but if I remember correctly, he didn't sign his extension until AFTER they had signed Moss.

I don't remember if it was before or after. I just remember hearing about how he was upset. I guess it might not have been Moss he was pissed at. Maybe he was pissed he didn't think he would get Number One cash. Either way he should have been happy that someone the caliber of Moss was coming and at the very least would ensure he saw nothing but single coverage.

07-28-2006, 07:53 AM
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $-1215873	Cut Kennison...Sign Porter??? Ok I may be dreaming but what would that, could that possibly happen?
Posts: 132,663

07-28-2006, 07:57 AM	#2
Eleazar Beyond the Rapids Join Date: May 2003 Location: Langley, VA Casino cash: $-370000	Sure it could happen. If the raiders decide not to trade him for something of value and instead cut him to get nothing in return, and absorb the cap hit from the contract extension he just signed last year.
Posts: 80,659

07-28-2006, 07:59 AM	#3
DaKCMan AP Beloved & Awesome CP Celebrity Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Florida Casino cash: $5574952	I believe Porter is a very good WR. However, we cannot sign him because he is under contract. Additionally, why would we cut Kennison? He's in camp doing everything he should be doing. __________________
Posts: 35,714

07-28-2006, 07:59 AM	#4
Hound333 Starter Join Date: Jul 2006 Casino cash: $7265392	No, I would rather have Kennison. Porter seemed to throw a little fit last year when they signed Moss because he wasn't gonna be the "man" anymore. Although it is fun to take former raiders (I refuse to capitalize that word) and send them to the pro-bowl.
Posts: 654

07-28-2006, 08:15 AM	#7
\|Zach\| For The Glory Of The City Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $2956768	Terrible.
Posts: 54,808

07-28-2006, 09:06 AM	#8
shaneo69 Smug Weasel Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Bleachers at Busch Casino cash: $10004900	I think we should trade Kennison for Lelie. I hear the rat is a big fan of Eddie's. __________________ "I like Chiefs president Carl Peterson. I respect his business savvy. I envy his management skills and his penchant never to be driven by the whims of popularity. I admire his willingness to take responsibility for decisions that don’t work out the way he would have wanted." - Rufus, from KCChiefs.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posts: 4,910

07-28-2006, 10:52 AM	#9
StcChief Playing for #1 Draft Pick Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Just West of Lambs land Casino cash: $10004900	Give Eddie a little more money. I think he has a good point as the #1 reciever. And has put up good numbers With all that was saved (TRich), now Roaf, King Carl will buck up. __________________ sig test for this screwy schema
Posts: 25,901

07-28-2006, 10:56 AM	#10
InChiefsHeaven Rockin' yer FACE OFF! Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Omaha, Nebraska Casino cash: $495437	Keep Kennison. We don't need any more bullshit right now. Let's keep the roster as solid as we can on the Offensive side... ...good Lord 'yall...we've lost Priest, TRich, Welbourn, Roaf...we don't need any more bullshit... __________________ We have a million reasons for failure, but not one excuse... Die Donks, DIE!! Holy Crap fellas!!! We did it!!! THREE TIMES!!!
Posts: 27,285