Federal judge orders Westboro Baptist Church to pay the funeral expenses of a Marine!

[pr_capone]

Link courtesy of Fark.com

http://www.kake.com/home/headlines/4...urce=enews&c=y

BALTIMORE (AP) -- A federal judge in Baltimore is ordering Topeka's Westboro Baptist Church to pay more than $3,000 in costs related to the funeral of a Marine the group picketed.

Albert Snyder of York, Pennsylvania, is suing because church
members demonstrated at the funeral of his son, Lance Corporal
Matthew Snyder. Church members also posted pictures of the protest
on their Web site.

Corporal Snyder was killed in Iraq in March.

The lawsuit was filed in June. It says church members violated
the family's right to privacy and defamed the Marine and his family
at the funeral and on the church's Web site.

Court documents say the church has 30 days to make the payment
to Snyder.

LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!

[Crashride]

Is that the same group of dumbasses that are always protesting on how they hate the soldiers?

[pr_capone]

Originally Posted by Crashride

Is that the same group of dumbasses that are always protesting on how they hate the soldiers?

Yup

[grandllama]

Originally Posted by Crashride

Is that the same group of dumbasses that are always protesting on how they hate the soldiers?

Yep, and its that same group of sodomites that decided to accost my family outside a Van Halen (!) concert at Kemper a couple of years ago... (the thread still exists somewhere) because my then preteen son who was on his way to Eagle Scout had the cojones to ask me why they hated America and one of the fockers heard him...

Good. Hopefully they'll all sue and win.

[Mr. Plow]

Originally Posted by Phobia

Good. Hopefully they'll all sue and win.

Hopefully this is just the first of many lawsuits to come.

[Smed1065]

Great news!

[DaFace]

Although I'm all for those bastards having to pay, I'm not sure I understand the basis for the ruling. Why should they have to pay for funeral expenses? Anybody know the laws better than I do who could explain?

[Braincase]

I hope they have to foreclose on those pig****ers.

[BIG_DADDY]

Is Dave Lane a member of that church?

[Fish]

A WBC Classic...

[SCChief]

Originally Posted by DaFace

Although I'm all for those bastards having to pay, I'm not sure I understand the basis for the ruling. Why should they have to pay for funeral expenses? Anybody know the laws better than I do who could explain?

I am not going to say I know the laws, but I can understand what appears to be the thinking. If you planned a wedding, and a group of people crashed that wedding in a disruptive manner (thus ruining a service you have paid for), then the perpetrators should be responsible for reimbursing you for your loss as a result of their actions. I have heard of it done from that angle before. I think that this judge ruled the same way for the funeral. A "you break it, you buy it" philosophy that may or may not stand up to an appeal.

[Coach]

Originally Posted by SCChief

I am not going to say I know the laws, but I can understand what appears to be the thinking. If you planned a wedding, and a group of people crashed that wedding in a disruptive manner (thus ruining a service you have paid for), then the perpetrators should be responsible for reimbursing you for your loss as a result of their actions. I have heard of it done from that angle before. I think that this judge ruled the same way for the funeral. A "you break it, you buy it" philosophy that may or may not stand up to an appeal.

That's how I see it as well.

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by DaFace

Although I'm all for those bastards having to pay, I'm not sure I understand the basis for the ruling. Why should they have to pay for funeral expenses? Anybody know the laws better than I do who could explain?

In civil suits the judge can order just about anything, hence the Seinfeld show where they talked about someone being ordered to be a butler, although they do have some limitations, and usually follow a preset precedence from other rulings, they can rule in favor of the plaintiff in case (the family) because of the extra hardship to lose a young family member, dealing with stupid people trying to make a political statement and those same stupid people posting a picture of the family at the funeral on their website.


It was probably a Military Funeral, therefore paid for with taxpayer dollars, since the group continues to protest military funerals, the Government can show a vested interest in these protests and the judge can punish them by making them pay for the funeral to the Government, saving a few precious tax dollars, and hopefully it will be seen as punishment to the group and discourage them from continuing these actions.....

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by crazycoffey

In civil suits the judge can order just about anything, hence the Seinfeld show where they talked about someone being ordered to be a butler, although they do have some limitations, and usually follow a preset precedence from other rulings, they can rule in favor of the plaintiff in case (the family) because of the extra hardship to lose a young family member, dealing with stupid people trying to make a political statement and those same stupid people posting a picture of the family at the funeral on their website.


It was probably a Military Funeral, therefore paid for with taxpayer dollars, since the group continues to protest military funerals, the Government can show a vested interest in these protests and the judge can punish them by making them pay for the funeral to the Government, saving a few precious tax dollars, and hopefully it will be seen as punishment to the group and discourage them from continuing these actions.....

That makes sense I guess. I'm just surprised no one's done it until now (sued them).