NFL Draft Walters Thursday Updated Mock Draft

Coogs · 12-17-2009, 08:25 AM

http://walterfootball.com/draft2010.php

1st Okung T Oklahoma State
2nd Miller OLB Texas A&M
2nd Spikes MLB Florida
3rd Stuckey S Kansas

NFLDraftCounddown is updated as well (one round only)...

http://www.draftcountdown.com/sub/Mock-Draft-A.php

1st Okung

talastan · 12-17-2009, 08:33 AM

I'd rather have Mays in the first if Berry is gone, but the rest isn't too bad. Spikes and Miller would give us an upgrade in the LB corps and replace the Stuckey in the third with an interior OL and you're good IMO.

KurtCobain · 12-17-2009, 09:05 AM

okung stinks

**MahiMike** · 12-17-2009, 09:06 AM

Now you're talkin! I'd be good with that. Especially Spikes.

Chiefnj2 · 12-17-2009, 09:07 AM

Walter Football has to be one of the worst draft sites.

Okung isn't nearly as bad as people on this board make him out to be, in fact, he's pretty good and will fit very nicely into a zone blocking team. He has very good feet and can easily get to the 2nd level.

Hays · 12-17-2009, 09:14 AM

too many big 12 players

Cosmos · 12-17-2009, 09:25 AM

How about an offensive playmaker somewhere??

WR, RB ??

Direckshun · 12-17-2009, 09:29 AM

I'm loving the second round. Holy jeez that'd be great.

Dark Horse · 12-17-2009, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cosmos

How about an offensive playmaker somewhere??

WR, RB ??

So many needs so few picks.

KevB · 12-17-2009, 09:50 AM

I realize this doesn't address one of the top needs we have (S, OL, LB, NT).....but pairing Spiller with Charles has me salivating. Two guys that can take it to the house anytime they touch the ball out of the backfield or on returns would be so nice. Return TDs and 76 yard runs from scrimmage can absolutely flip a game from a loss to a win. They keep each other fresh, and you can throw them back there to return kicks as well. You typically hear teams pairing a big with a small (thunder and lightning)....but what's wrong with Lightning paired with Lightning.

I'm not saying that's absolutely who we should take, but I wouldn't hate it.

BigCatDaddy · 12-17-2009, 10:05 AM

Not bad in rounds 2-3. If we could trade that 1st round pick and address the O-Line and WR postion that would be even better.

tyton75 · 12-17-2009, 10:09 AM

I think we'll trade down in the 1st anyway

Chiefnj2 · 12-17-2009, 10:13 AM

There is a very nice block of blue collar talent from 72 -87 (Decker, Johnson, Gerhart, Gilyard, Black, Graham, Canfield, Micah Johnson and Tennant).

TEX · 12-17-2009, 10:18 AM

Nothing like following the draft ALL season...

ToxSocks · 12-17-2009, 10:21 AM

Alright, ima go ahead and start convincing myself that Okung is the right pick, that way, when we draft him, i won't be as pissed.

We could have Okung at LT, Albert at LG, Waters at C...and still have shit on the right side.....ehh...not a bad left side, but still shit on the right.

**** this. we need a playmaker with our #1. Find Linemen in the later rounds. Albert is fine at LT and Waters is fine at LG.

12-17-2009, 08:25 AM
Coogs In Search of a Life Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Northern Kansas Casino cash: $-2265651	Walters Thursday Updated Mock Draft http://walterfootball.com/draft2010.php 1st Okung T Oklahoma State 2nd Miller OLB Texas A&M 2nd Spikes MLB Florida 3rd Stuckey S Kansas NFLDraftCounddown is updated as well (one round only)... http://www.draftcountdown.com/sub/Mock-Draft-A.php 1st Okung
Posts: 21,910

12-17-2009, 08:33 AM	#2
talastan Manning, we're coming for you! Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Springfield, Mo Casino cash: $10004950	I'd rather have Mays in the first if Berry is gone, but the rest isn't too bad. Spikes and Miller would give us an upgrade in the LB corps and replace the Stuckey in the third with an interior OL and you're good IMO. __________________ Can we please just draft AND DEVELOP a QB - est. since 1983 Check out my band: Truett and the Traitors
Posts: 4,815

12-17-2009, 09:05 AM	#3
KurtCobain legend Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Independence, MO Casino cash: $-3347903	okung stinks
Posts: 28,546

12-17-2009, 09:06 AM	#4
MahiMike He's Mahomie! Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Jax, FL Casino cash: $10023443	Now you're talkin! I'd be good with that. Especially Spikes. __________________ 99.9%
Posts: 17,387

12-17-2009, 09:07 AM	#5
Chiefnj2 In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $6654388	Walter Football has to be one of the worst draft sites. Okung isn't nearly as bad as people on this board make him out to be, in fact, he's pretty good and will fit very nicely into a zone blocking team. He has very good feet and can easily get to the 2nd level. __________________ Mismanaging the clock.
Posts: 22,541

12-17-2009, 09:14 AM	#6
Hays Starter Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Columbia MO Casino cash: $7559582	too many big 12 players
Posts: 489

12-17-2009, 09:25 AM	#7
Cosmos Veteran Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: California Casino cash: $4114900	How about an offensive playmaker somewhere?? WR, RB ??
Posts: 3,646

12-17-2009, 09:29 AM	#8
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $2033447	I'm loving the second round. Holy jeez that'd be great.
Posts: 59,693

12-17-2009, 09:50 AM	#10
KevB Agree to Disagree Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: The State of Euphoria Casino cash: $10026612	I realize this doesn't address one of the top needs we have (S, OL, LB, NT).....but pairing Spiller with Charles has me salivating. Two guys that can take it to the house anytime they touch the ball out of the backfield or on returns would be so nice. Return TDs and 76 yard runs from scrimmage can absolutely flip a game from a loss to a win. They keep each other fresh, and you can throw them back there to return kicks as well. You typically hear teams pairing a big with a small (thunder and lightning)....but what's wrong with Lightning paired with Lightning. I'm not saying that's absolutely who we should take, but I wouldn't hate it.
Posts: 14,446

12-17-2009, 10:05 AM	#11
BigCatDaddy The Beast Inside Your Head Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $-1800878	Not bad in rounds 2-3. If we could trade that 1st round pick and address the O-Line and WR postion that would be even better.
Posts: 26,275

12-17-2009, 10:09 AM	#12
tyton75 Veteran Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: KC North Casino cash: $3698386	I think we'll trade down in the 1st anyway __________________
Posts: 3,336

12-17-2009, 10:13 AM	#13
Chiefnj2 In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $6654388	There is a very nice block of blue collar talent from 72 -87 (Decker, Johnson, Gerhart, Gilyard, Black, Graham, Canfield, Micah Johnson and Tennant). __________________ Mismanaging the clock.
Posts: 22,541

12-17-2009, 10:18 AM	#14
TEX Out Gunning CP's Fandom Police Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Galveston, TX Casino cash: $-1446873	Nothing like following the draft ALL season... __________________ "Do we have time to run WASP?"
Posts: 37,106

12-17-2009, 10:21 AM	#15
ToxSocks Needs more middle fingers Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: San Diego Casino cash: $2023063	Alright, ima go ahead and start convincing myself that Okung is the right pick, that way, when we draft him, i won't be as pissed. We could have Okung at LT, Albert at LG, Waters at C...and still have shit on the right side.....ehh...not a bad left side, but still shit on the right. **** this. we need a playmaker with our #1. Find Linemen in the later rounds. Albert is fine at LT and Waters is fine at LG. __________________ Life is like a dick. Sometimes it gets hard for no reason, but it can't stay hard forever.
Posts: 65,925

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode