You know what's kind of weird?

Chris Meck · 02-10-2019, 11:56 AM

There's nothing the Chiefs could do that would upset me, other than maybe drafting a QB in the first.

There are some positions that if they drafted high I'd be scratching my head, but...

mostly, I'd just be curious as to what they were planning.

That's a different feeling. Not like before.

htismaqe · 02-12-2019, 02:07 PM

I feel exactly the same. I mean, I'm not going to jump for joy if they take a bunch of offensive linemen but there's almost nothing they can do that would upset me.

CoMoChief · 02-12-2019, 05:41 PM

I'd be pretty pissed if they drafted any offensive player in rd 1 or 2.

Sorry, I'm just not on board w/ the "draft a TE early" train.

This team needs all the D players it can get.

Discuss Thrower · 02-12-2019, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

I'd be pretty pissed if they drafted any offensive player in rd 1 or 2.

Sorry, I'm just not on board w/ the "draft a TE early" train.

This team needs all the D players it can get.

I don't see why you should get pissed for any offensive player off in the first 64 picks. If you particularly dislike the offensive guy or guys taken for X, Y and Z reasons then sure.

The draft is a crapshoot holmes. Odds are a first rounder doesn't play good enough to justify a long term deal and those odds get worse as you go into the later rounds.

Get a guy you have a reasonable chance to be a long-term answer as a starter and hope he earns his starts sooner than later.

htismaqe · 02-12-2019, 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

I don't see why you should get pissed for any offensive player off in the first 64 picks. If you particularly dislike the offensive guy or guys taken for X, Y and Z reasons then sure.

The draft is a crapshoot holmes. Odds are a first rounder doesn't play good enough to justify a long term deal and those odds get worse as you go into the later rounds.

Get a guy you have a reasonable chance to be a long-term answer as a starter and hope he earns his starts sooner than later.

Yep. An offensive player that contributes next year is better than a defensive player that doesn't.

This team is built to win right freaking now. They need their first 3 picks (at least) to get significant snaps next year and if that means drafting some offense, go for it.

**Buehler445** · 02-12-2019, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Yep. An offensive player that contributes next year is better than a defensive player that doesn't.

This team is built to win right freaking now. They need their first 3 picks (at least) to get significant snaps next year and if that means drafting some offense, go for it.

Absolutely. Hitting is the most important thing, bar none.

Chris Meck · 02-12-2019, 10:59 PM

I personally would prefer one more defense heavy draft. I think it's the smart move to build something for the next 5 years, and several probably Super Bowl teams.

But...if the team figures that some FA's can fill holes and they elect to draft BPA and it happens that offensive players are the highest rated guys on their board, I'll play along and see what shakes out.

kccrow · 02-13-2019, 05:10 AM

I'm all for defense heavy, but I don't think you ignore the offense just because it's good. I would not at all be pissed if KC took an offensive lineman or skill guy on day 2. I really don't want an offensive player in round 1 though.

Chris Meck · 02-15-2019, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow

I'm all for defense heavy, but I don't think you ignore the offense just because it's good. I would not at all be pissed if KC took an offensive lineman or skill guy on day 2. I really don't want an offensive player in round 1 though.

I think it unlikely you draft an immediate offensive starter in round 1. I mean, where would they play? In THIS offense? it's complicated to learn, and we're STACKED. unless you draft some all world LG or something.

In58men · 02-15-2019, 03:55 PM

No namer OL pick would be fine me. If Chiefs think he can protect Pat, I’m all for it .

**The Franchise** · 02-15-2019, 03:58 PM

QB, K or P. Anything else and I'm perfectly fine as long as he's starting day 1.

02-10-2019, 11:56 AM
Chris Meck MVP Join Date: May 2001 Location: midtown KC Casino cash: $374910	You know what's kind of weird? There's nothing the Chiefs could do that would upset me, other than maybe drafting a QB in the first. There are some positions that if they drafted high I'd be scratching my head, but... mostly, I'd just be curious as to what they were planning. That's a different feeling. Not like before.
Posts: 18,109

02-12-2019, 02:07 PM	#2
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $9749900	I feel exactly the same. I mean, I'm not going to jump for joy if they take a bunch of offensive linemen but there's almost nothing they can do that would upset me.
Posts: 100,274

02-12-2019, 05:41 PM	#3
CoMoChief Mahomes Dynasty Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Parts Unknown Casino cash: $7822254	I'd be pretty pissed if they drafted any offensive player in rd 1 or 2. Sorry, I'm just not on board w/ the "draft a TE early" train. This team needs all the D players it can get. __________________
Posts: 39,204

02-12-2019, 10:59 PM	#7
Chris Meck MVP Join Date: May 2001 Location: midtown KC Casino cash: $374910	I personally would prefer one more defense heavy draft. I think it's the smart move to build something for the next 5 years, and several probably Super Bowl teams. But...if the team figures that some FA's can fill holes and they elect to draft BPA and it happens that offensive players are the highest rated guys on their board, I'll play along and see what shakes out.
Posts: 18,109

02-13-2019, 05:10 AM	#8
kccrow MVP Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Michigan Casino cash: $236403	I'm all for defense heavy, but I don't think you ignore the offense just because it's good. I would not at all be pissed if KC took an offensive lineman or skill guy on day 2. I really don't want an offensive player in round 1 though.
Posts: 12,768

02-15-2019, 03:55 PM	#10
In58men **** you, you cretin. Join Date: Jan 2012 Casino cash: $338026	No namer OL pick would be fine me. If Chiefs think he can protect Pat, I’m all for it . __________________ Attendance Chief record 11-9
Posts: 30,175

02-15-2019, 03:58 PM	#11
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $2555047	QB, K or P. Anything else and I'm perfectly fine as long as he's starting day 1.
Posts: 92,316