Chiefs Peter King: Shanahan will NOT coach the Chiefs

**DaneMcCloud** · 01-24-2009, 11:59 AM

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...efs/index.html

Shanahan will 'definitely' not coach Chiefs, or anyone else in 2009

By Peter King, SI.com

Despite a report, Mike Shanahan is not in talks to coach the Chiefs in 2009.

Deposed Denver coach Mike Shanahan will "definitely'' not coach the Kansas City Chiefs in 2009 -- nor will he take a coaching job anywhere prior to the 2009 season, an NFL source close to Shanahan said late Friday night. The source said Shanahan was adamant that he was not coaching the Chiefs.

This confirms the NFL Network report by Adam Schefter from Friday evening that Shanahan would not take the Kansas City job, which was a response to an ESPN report that Shanahan and the Chiefs were in talks that could have had him replacing Herman Edwards, who was fired by new general manager Scott Pioli Friday.

The affirmation that Shanahan won't coach anywhere at the start of the 2009 season won't do anything to lessen the heat on coaches in tenuous positions to start next season, like Dallas coach Wade Phillips. Cowboys owner Jerry Jones admires both Shanahan and Mike Holmgren, the former Seattle coach who likely will return to football in 2010 as a coach or general manager or both.

Why did the Shanahan story gain so much momentum late in the week? Shanahan, shortly after he was fired Dec. 30, expressed admiration for Pioli to a friend and said anyone who would take a coaching job this off-season would love to be able to work with Pioli because he was the best personnel man in the business. Shanahan would want a strong personnel man to accompany him in whatever new coaching job he'd take, and Pioli, who was on the verge of firing Edwards, was exactly that man.

But there wasn't a compelling reason for Shanahan to take the Kansas City job. This is a good year for Shanahan to kick back. He's getting paid $7 million from Denver owner Pat Bowlen to not coach. His daughter is getting married this summer. He needs time to re-assemble a coaching staff. In the end, the Kansas City job might have made sense from the standpoint of a team in need with an owner, Clark Hunt, who would spend the money to win and a smart young GM. But it didn't make sense to Shanahan.

sorry if repost

BigChiefFan · 01-24-2009, 12:01 PM

Repost of a repost. And the entire story is based off of Schefter's report. King doesn't know squat.

Chief Roundup · 01-24-2009, 12:03 PM

I don't want shanahan

88TG88 · 01-24-2009, 12:03 PM

j-mac · 01-24-2009, 12:04 PM

Sweet Breasteses

CHIEF4EVER · 01-24-2009, 12:04 PM

Since Schefter and King both are reporting this it is almost certain that the Rat is on the way here.

FringeNC · 01-24-2009, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan

Repost of a repost. And the entire story is based off of Schefter's report. King doesn't know squat.

Yep, if your source is the same source as Shefter's, it is not what they call independent confirmation.

JuicesFlowing · 01-24-2009, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CHIEF4EVER

Since Schefter and King both are reporting this it is almost certain that the Rat is on the way here.

That would be hilarious.

blueballs · 01-24-2009, 12:07 PM

King of the Peters
has spoken

BigChiefFan · 01-24-2009, 12:11 PM

and I quote..."Shanahan, shortly after he was fired Dec. 30, expressed admiration for Pioli to a friend and said anyone who would take a coaching job this off-season would love to be able to work with Pioli because he was the best personnel man in the business. Shanahan would want a strong personnel man to accompany him in whatever new coaching job he'd take, and Pioli, who was on the verge of firing Edwards, was exactly that man."

And then he states "But it didn't make sense to Shanahan."

Does that ****er even have a cohesive thought? That doesn't even make sense.

Basileus777 · 01-24-2009, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefFan

and I quote..."Shanahan, shortly after he was fired Dec. 30, expressed admiration for Pioli to a friend and said anyone who would take a coaching job this off-season would love to be able to work with Pioli because he was the best personnel man in the business. Shanahan would want a strong personnel man to accompany him in whatever new coaching job he'd take, and Pioli, who was on the verge of firing Edwards, was exactly that man."

And then he states "But it didn't make sense to Shanahan."

Does that ****er even have a cohesive thought? That doesn't even make sense.

He's speculating off of another man's source, I'm not surprised it isn't completely coherent.

JuicesFlowing · 01-24-2009, 12:15 PM

I wish ONE news source would get their shit straight. I'm still annoyed that ESPN claimed a deal was imminent. WTF

milkman · 01-24-2009, 12:16 PM

All these conflicting reports tell us one thing.

Nobody knows a ****ing thing.

JuicesFlowing · 01-24-2009, 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

All these conflicting reports tell us one thing.

Nobody knows a ****ing thing.

That's the truth.

**ShortRoundChief** · 01-24-2009, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

All these conflicting reports tell us one thing.

Nobody knows a ****ing thing.

I think it's hilarious. Pioli is spinning these newspapers like a top.

01-24-2009, 11:59 AM
DaneMcCloud Supporter Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Hollywood, CA Casino cash: $10053648	Peter King: Shanahan will NOT coach the Chiefs http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...efs/index.html Shanahan will 'definitely' not coach Chiefs, or anyone else in 2009 By Peter King, SI.com Despite a report, Mike Shanahan is not in talks to coach the Chiefs in 2009. Deposed Denver coach Mike Shanahan will "definitely'' not coach the Kansas City Chiefs in 2009 -- nor will he take a coaching job anywhere prior to the 2009 season, an NFL source close to Shanahan said late Friday night. The source said Shanahan was adamant that he was not coaching the Chiefs. This confirms the NFL Network report by Adam Schefter from Friday evening that Shanahan would not take the Kansas City job, which was a response to an ESPN report that Shanahan and the Chiefs were in talks that could have had him replacing Herman Edwards, who was fired by new general manager Scott Pioli Friday. The affirmation that Shanahan won't coach anywhere at the start of the 2009 season won't do anything to lessen the heat on coaches in tenuous positions to start next season, like Dallas coach Wade Phillips. Cowboys owner Jerry Jones admires both Shanahan and Mike Holmgren, the former Seattle coach who likely will return to football in 2010 as a coach or general manager or both. Why did the Shanahan story gain so much momentum late in the week? Shanahan, shortly after he was fired Dec. 30, expressed admiration for Pioli to a friend and said anyone who would take a coaching job this off-season would love to be able to work with Pioli because he was the best personnel man in the business. Shanahan would want a strong personnel man to accompany him in whatever new coaching job he'd take, and Pioli, who was on the verge of firing Edwards, was exactly that man. But there wasn't a compelling reason for Shanahan to take the Kansas City job. This is a good year for Shanahan to kick back. He's getting paid $7 million from Denver owner Pat Bowlen to not coach. His daughter is getting married this summer. He needs time to re-assemble a coaching staff. In the end, the Kansas City job might have made sense from the standpoint of a team in need with an owner, Clark Hunt, who would spend the money to win and a smart young GM. But it didn't make sense to Shanahan. sorry if repost
Posts: 88,960

01-24-2009, 12:01 PM	#2
BigChiefFan MVP Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: In the Top 10 Casino cash: $9924205	Repost of a repost. And the entire story is based off of Schefter's report. King doesn't know squat. __________________ A 35 year drought can make you thirsty.
Posts: 15,777

01-24-2009, 12:03 PM	#3
Chief Roundup Admitted Planet Junky Join Date: Oct 2000 Casino cash: $-1578373	I don't want shanahan __________________ Fanaticism is nowhere. There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
Posts: 19,565

01-24-2009, 12:03 PM	#4
88TG88 don't tell me about collage Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Los Angeles Casino cash: $10009184	good
Posts: 6,274

01-24-2009, 12:04 PM	#5
j-mac Wookie Join Date: Dec 2007 Casino cash: $10005452	Sweet Breasteses
Posts: 15

01-24-2009, 12:04 PM	#6
CHIEF4EVER Just a man in the 'ghan Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Jalalabad, Afghanistan Casino cash: $10004900	Since Schefter and King both are reporting this it is almost certain that the Rat is on the way here.
Posts: 13,670

01-24-2009, 12:07 PM	#9
blueballs Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	King of the Peters has spoken
Posts: 14,233

01-24-2009, 12:11 PM	#10
BigChiefFan MVP Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: In the Top 10 Casino cash: $9924205	and I quote..."Shanahan, shortly after he was fired Dec. 30, expressed admiration for Pioli to a friend and said anyone who would take a coaching job this off-season would love to be able to work with Pioli because he was the best personnel man in the business. Shanahan would want a strong personnel man to accompany him in whatever new coaching job he'd take, and Pioli, who was on the verge of firing Edwards, was exactly that man." And then he states "But it didn't make sense to Shanahan." Does that ****er even have a cohesive thought? That doesn't even make sense. __________________ A 35 year drought can make you thirsty.
Posts: 15,777

01-24-2009, 12:15 PM	#12
JuicesFlowing Losing with passion. Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Oblivion Casino cash: $10004925	I wish ONE news source would get their shit straight. I'm still annoyed that ESPN claimed a deal was imminent. WTF
Posts: 4,399

01-24-2009, 12:16 PM	#13
milkman Dumbass! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Leading the Marty bashing Casino cash: $10029395	All these conflicting reports tell us one thing. Nobody knows a ****ing thing. __________________
Posts: 70,769