Chiefs If not Shanahan..

Frankie · 01-24-2009, 12:58 PM

... then it might really be the case that Todd Haley is the candidate Pioli is focusing on. With that in mind, somebody posted this article/editorial on another Chiefs forum which I found kind of interesting:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...th-kansas-city

Ten Reasons Kurt Warner Will Sign with Kansas City

The Kansas City Chiefs fired coach Herm Edwards after posting a 15-34 record in three seasons, including 2-14 this season. Since the hiring of Scott Pioli as general manager, it has been rumored that changes within the organization will occur. Former Denver Broncos coach Mike Shanahan's name continues to surface as a possibility of becoming the next head coach; however, it remains unlikely Shanahan will be coaching in Kansas City next season.

After the Super Bowl, the Chiefs will seek permission to talk with Arizona offensive coordinator Todd Haley regarding the vacant coaching position. Haley's stock has flourished in conjunction with the Cardinals run through the NFC playoffs and the team's first ever Super Bowl appearance. Both Haley and Pioli have one major connection: Bill Parcells.

Only three NFL franchises have posted worse records than the Chiefs in the past three years; Detroit, Oakland and St. Louis. Kansas City has traditionally been a winning franchise until recently. Since the Chiefs play in a weak AFC West division, the possibility of turning the franchise around in a shorter period of time increases.

If the Chiefs decide to hire Haley as head coach, he will bring the explosive passing offense from Arizona to Kansas City. Haley needs a gunslinger for a quarterback and balance at the wide receiver position to be successful.

Mel Kiper has posted his 2009 mock NFL draft on espn.com. Right now, Kiper has the Chiefs selecting USC quarterback Matt Sanchez at No. 3. Kansas City does need to upgrade the quarterback position, but Kiper based this selection on Edwards still being coach.

The hiring of Haley will probably lead the team to select Texas Tech WR Michael Crabtree with the No. 3 pick. Realistically, Haley wants a quick turnaround with the franchise and drafting a QB will slow him down. Crabtree provides Haley with a balanced wide receiver attack, similar to Larry Fitzgerald and Anquin Boldin in Arizona, with Dwayne Bowe and future hall-of-fame TE Tony Gonzalez.

The Chiefs already have RB Larry Johnson and Jamaal Charles in place. Ultimately, Haley will be seeking a free-agent quarterback. If Kansas City does hire Haley as head coach, the following 10 reasons represent why Kurt Warner will be the Kansas City Chiefs quarterback next season:

1. Haley is head coach

2. Warner has familiarity with Haley's offensive system

3. Warner is an unrestricted free-agent

4. Economic decision by Arizona Cardinals. Matt Leinart was No. 10 pick in 2006 NFL Draft and makes a substantial amount of money as a back-up. Can't keep him on the bench much longer.

5. At 37, seeking a potential two-year deal to finish career

6. Guarantee starting quarterback job

7. Gets to throw to Bowe, Crabtree and Gonzalez

8. Play in a weak AFC West division

9. Opportunity to play in the Midwest (originally from Cedar Rapids, Iowa)

10. Irony. Began NFL career in Missouri (St. Louis); will end NFL career in Missouri (Kansas City)

If that turns out to be true, do you think the Chiefs will go after someone like Harrell or Freeman as a 2 year grooming project? I guess I will be watching the Senior Bowl today with the extra incentive of watching Harrell and the rest of the Senior QBs.

JuicesFlowing · 01-24-2009, 01:00 PM

No thanks. As appealing as a soon-to-be 38 year old QB is, I think I'll pass.

Basileus777 · 01-24-2009, 01:02 PM

He isn't leaving Arizona.

**Rausch** · 01-24-2009, 01:03 PM

If we signed Spurt AND drafted a QB in round 1, yeah, I'd be cool with that.

I do not like signing an old vet for the sake of a 1 year playoff push...

milkman · 01-24-2009, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JuicesFlowing

No thanks. As appealing as a soon-to-be 38 year old QB is, I think I'll pass.

This.

kcpasco · 01-24-2009, 01:07 PM

As long as we draft a young qb, I wouldn't mind.

milkman · 01-24-2009, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch

If we signed Spurt AND drafted a QB in round 1, yeah, I'd be cool with that.

I do not like signing an old vet for the sake of a 1 year playoff push...

Now, that is not a bad idea.

Stafford/Sanchez learning from Warner could work.

sparkky · 01-24-2009, 01:07 PM

I absolutely cannot see that happening and wouldn't be a happy camper if it did.
One of the youngest teams in the NFL doesn't need one of the oldest QB's in the NFL.

milkman · 01-24-2009, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sparkky

I absolutely cannot see that happening and wouldn't be a happy camper if it did.
One of the youngest teams in the NFL doesn't need one of the oldest QB's in the NFL.

That was my initial reaction, but Rausch makes a good point.

Sure-Oz · 01-24-2009, 01:12 PM

7 years ago sure

Frankie · 01-24-2009, 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JuicesFlowing

No thanks. As appealing as a soon-to-be 38 year old QB is, I think I'll pass.

I don't know, if Warner can play like this under Haley for a year or two, this might be a chance for us to develop a QBOTF.

Frankie · 01-24-2009, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basileus777

He isn't leaving Arizona.

That's no stronger a speculation than his leaving AZ.

**DeezNutz** · 01-24-2009, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch

If we signed Spurt AND drafted a QB in round 1, yeah, I'd be cool with that.

I do not like signing an old vet for the sake of a 1 year playoff push...

Thank you.

**the Talking Can** · 01-24-2009, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch

If we signed Spurt AND drafted a QB in round 1, yeah, I'd be cool with that.

I do not like signing an old vet for the sake of a 1 year playoff push...

yes

as long as we draft a QB, otherwise we're just cheating the rebuild and in two years we still won't have a QB....

Frankie · 01-24-2009, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch

If we signed Spurt AND drafted a QB in round 1, yeah, I'd be cool with that.

I do not like signing an old vet for the sake of a 1 year playoff push...

The playoff push would only be a secondary windfall to actually having a young QB learn under Haley and Warner.

01-24-2009, 12:58 PM
Frankie Banned Join Date: Jul 2001 Casino cash: $10004900	If not Shanahan.. ... then it might really be the case that Todd Haley is the candidate Pioli is focusing on. With that in mind, somebody posted this article/editorial on another Chiefs forum which I found kind of interesting: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...th-kansas-city Ten Reasons Kurt Warner Will Sign with Kansas City The Kansas City Chiefs fired coach Herm Edwards after posting a 15-34 record in three seasons, including 2-14 this season. Since the hiring of Scott Pioli as general manager, it has been rumored that changes within the organization will occur. Former Denver Broncos coach Mike Shanahan's name continues to surface as a possibility of becoming the next head coach; however, it remains unlikely Shanahan will be coaching in Kansas City next season. After the Super Bowl, the Chiefs will seek permission to talk with Arizona offensive coordinator Todd Haley regarding the vacant coaching position. Haley's stock has flourished in conjunction with the Cardinals run through the NFC playoffs and the team's first ever Super Bowl appearance. Both Haley and Pioli have one major connection: Bill Parcells. Only three NFL franchises have posted worse records than the Chiefs in the past three years; Detroit, Oakland and St. Louis. Kansas City has traditionally been a winning franchise until recently. Since the Chiefs play in a weak AFC West division, the possibility of turning the franchise around in a shorter period of time increases. If the Chiefs decide to hire Haley as head coach, he will bring the explosive passing offense from Arizona to Kansas City. Haley needs a gunslinger for a quarterback and balance at the wide receiver position to be successful. Mel Kiper has posted his 2009 mock NFL draft on espn.com. Right now, Kiper has the Chiefs selecting USC quarterback Matt Sanchez at No. 3. Kansas City does need to upgrade the quarterback position, but Kiper based this selection on Edwards still being coach. The hiring of Haley will probably lead the team to select Texas Tech WR Michael Crabtree with the No. 3 pick. Realistically, Haley wants a quick turnaround with the franchise and drafting a QB will slow him down. Crabtree provides Haley with a balanced wide receiver attack, similar to Larry Fitzgerald and Anquin Boldin in Arizona, with Dwayne Bowe and future hall-of-fame TE Tony Gonzalez. The Chiefs already have RB Larry Johnson and Jamaal Charles in place. Ultimately, Haley will be seeking a free-agent quarterback. If Kansas City does hire Haley as head coach, the following 10 reasons represent why Kurt Warner will be the Kansas City Chiefs quarterback next season: 1. Haley is head coach 2. Warner has familiarity with Haley's offensive system 3. Warner is an unrestricted free-agent 4. Economic decision by Arizona Cardinals. Matt Leinart was No. 10 pick in 2006 NFL Draft and makes a substantial amount of money as a back-up. Can't keep him on the bench much longer. 5. At 37, seeking a potential two-year deal to finish career 6. Guarantee starting quarterback job 7. Gets to throw to Bowe, Crabtree and Gonzalez 8. Play in a weak AFC West division 9. Opportunity to play in the Midwest (originally from Cedar Rapids, Iowa) 10. Irony. Began NFL career in Missouri (St. Louis); will end NFL career in Missouri (Kansas City) If that turns out to be true, do you think the Chiefs will go after someone like Harrell or Freeman as a 2 year grooming project? I guess I will be watching the Senior Bowl today with the extra incentive of watching Harrell and the rest of the Senior QBs.
Posts: 26,959

01-24-2009, 01:00 PM	#2
JuicesFlowing Losing with passion. Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Oblivion Casino cash: $10004925	No thanks. As appealing as a soon-to-be 38 year old QB is, I think I'll pass.
Posts: 4,399

01-24-2009, 01:02 PM	#3
Basileus777 MVP Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: New Jersey Casino cash: $2195958	He isn't leaving Arizona.
Posts: 9,420

01-24-2009, 01:07 PM	#6
kcpasco MVP Join Date: Sep 2007 Casino cash: $6143463	As long as we draft a young qb, I wouldn't mind.
Posts: 15,945

01-24-2009, 01:07 PM	#8
sparkky Veteran Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Arkansas Casino cash: $10004900	I absolutely cannot see that happening and wouldn't be a happy camper if it did. One of the youngest teams in the NFL doesn't need one of the oldest QB's in the NFL.
Posts: 1,090