Football Sanchez? - Page 3

Hootie · 10-18-2009, 04:45 PM

Man...sure glad we didn't draft him...he looks terrible.

**DeezNutz** · 10-18-2009, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie

That's right he threw 3 Interceptions didn't he? Oh wait.....
Posted via Mobile Device

You're right. He just had another one of those 300-yard games which you often alluded to. Oh, wait...

Pioli Zombie · 10-18-2009, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Most of the claims I've seen have stated that he unquestionably has greater upside, which was and is true.

No it isn't. You guys say that but its based on nothing other than he's 22. He had one hyped up year at USC. When was this brilliance ever put on display?
Posted via Mobile Device

KC kid · 10-18-2009, 05:03 PM

4 ints

Hootie · 10-18-2009, 05:03 PM

well that was a good pass

Pablo · 10-18-2009, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Nonsense. I just flipped on the Jets game. Saw the 3rd INT, which had as much to do with Edwards as it did Sanchez. Putting the ball up for a playmaker? Terrible, terrible decision.

Cassel looked like complete shit today.

But, for the sake of argument, better than bad does not equal good.

Putting the ball up for a playmaker; into the wind and into double coverage is a terrible decision.

And there's another INT.

Pioli Zombie · 10-18-2009, 05:03 PM

Intersanchez!!!!!
Posted via Mobile Device

**mlyonsd** · 10-18-2009, 05:03 PM

What a DA for catching that. Must be a contract thing.

LaChapelle · 10-18-2009, 05:03 PM

Trent Green sends kisses. Pro-bowl DB kisses.

**doomy3** · 10-18-2009, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Nonsense. I just flipped on the Jets game. Saw the 3rd INT, which had as much to do with Edwards as it did Sanchez. Putting the ball up for a playmaker? Terrible, terrible decision.

Cassel looked like complete shit today.

But, for the sake of argument, better than bad does not equal good.

So, you just flipped on the game, but can state that he hasn't played exponentially worse than Cassel today?

OK.

Hootie · 10-18-2009, 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

When Cassel was this age, he was a third string TE and part time STer in college. He wasn't starting in the NFL.

He's been abysmal today. Awful. But it's his sixth start. I think I'll wait before taking Costanza's advice on QB play.

whoa whoa whoa whoa....

If this were the Chiefs QB and a Carl pick....

I doubt this would be your reaction.

chiefzilla1501 · 10-18-2009, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Yes, these questions are almost always settled by week 6 of a QB's rookie season. What makes Sanchez's performance all the more damning, however, is Cassel's exemplary game earlier today.

No way the Chiefs would have won without his crisp play.

Really? That's funny, because so many of his supporters were quick to annoint him as a stud in the making after 5 games. Look, a lot of Chiefs' fans have been screaming up and down about how the Chiefs made an astronomically horrible decision by passing up Sanchez over Cassel. After only 5 games!

I've said a million times that I think Sanchez will ultimately be better than Cassel, but it's ridiculous to make that judgment based on a few games in entirely different team situations.

I never said here that this is a ringing endorsement for Cassel. And I've never made any kind of an indictment on Sanchez. I'm just criticizing the ridiculous Cassel critics who scream at the top of their lungs about how Sanchez was such an outstanding QB and Cassel is just plain lousy.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-18-2009, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac

well that was a good pass

And it's a pass you make every time on 4th down. Unlike Cassel, who in the same situation today, held on to the ball rather than forcing it in on 4th down, and it cost us a potential 1st down, points, and at worst would have led to them getting the ball pinned farther back.

**DeezNutz** · 10-18-2009, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

So, you just flipped on the game, but can state that he hasn't played exponentially worse than Cassel today?

OK.

Did I say that?

Don't use such ridiculous hyperbole in your comparison, and I won't call nonsense.

Hootie · 10-18-2009, 05:06 PM

so...

Sanchez >>>>> Cassel

?

Pioli Zombie · 10-18-2009, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

You're right. He just had another one of those 300-yard games which you often alluded to. Oh, wait...

He plays on the Kansas City Chiefs. If he was on Jets he would have a few 300 yard games by now. Sanchez has a running game, an OL, and a defense and he still SUCKS.
Posted via Mobile Device

10-18-2009, 04:45 PM
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	Sanchez? Man...sure glad we didn't draft him...he looks terrible.
Posts: 56,356

10-18-2009, 05:03 PM	#33
KC kid Veteran Join Date: Oct 2003 Casino cash: $10004940	4 ints
Posts: 1,374

10-18-2009, 05:03 PM	#34
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	well that was a good pass
Posts: 56,356

10-18-2009, 05:03 PM	#36
Pioli Zombie Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: olathe,kansas Casino cash: $10004900	Intersanchez!!!!! Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 11,077

10-18-2009, 05:03 PM	#37
mlyonsd Supporter Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Spink, SD Casino cash: $-2196238	What a DA for catching that. Must be a contract thing.
Posts: 39,478

10-18-2009, 05:03 PM	#38
LaChapelle Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	Trent Green sends kisses. Pro-bowl DB kisses.
Posts: 8,588

10-18-2009, 05:06 PM	#44
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	so... Sanchez >>>>> Cassel ?
Posts: 56,356