|
|
View Poll Results: Would you rather play the older guys or look for younger players to contribute? | |||
We need the older guys. They provide valuable leadership. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
85 | 82.52% |
We shouldn't have signed the older guys, we should find and develop younger players and let them play. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 17.48% |
Voters: 103. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
Topic Starter |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
Casino cash: $5026719
|
I like Herm's method better...
I would rather play with a bunch of young players and develop them than sign a bunch of old guys if we know that we are going to be bad. Most people seem to believe that the Chiefs are going to be lucky to win six games.
If that is the case, why not look for the next Brandon Carr, Mark Bradley or Mike Cox??? It's hard to find those guys if they don't get a chance to play. Why are we wasting this valuable playing time on players like Zach Thomas, Mike Vrabel, Mike Goff, and Bobby Engram??? I am sure that they will contribute and play well for the Chiefs at times. If we were a team that were close to making a playoff run, I would welcome the addition of the older players, but the Chiefs are still developing their roster especially with the change to the 3-4. If we are going to be bad, I would really rather see Brian Johnston play rather than Vrabel. And I would rather see Quinten Lawrence play rather than Engram. Or are you one that believes that these older players provide valuable leadership??? |
Posts: 2,557
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|