Dirk Digler vote (just curious) Random Lottery

Logical · 04-10-2008, 08:47 PM

Lets all vote on a measure that would require Dirk Digler to stand in front of KFC on the 2nd Tuesday of each month and a random lottery winner would have to kick him in the balls. Would it pass?

KCChiefsMan · 04-10-2008, 08:52 PM

isn't Dirk Digler a fictional character?

Logical · 04-10-2008, 09:25 PM

What no moral opposition to lotteries?

Logical · 04-10-2008, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsMan

isn't Dirk Digler a fictional character?

I don't know, I just know we have someone on the BB that uses that username.

smittysbar · 04-10-2008, 09:49 PM

Thought the poll was dumb but wanted my 10 bucks, or maybe I just don't get it???????

Logical · 04-10-2008, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smittysbar

Thought the poll was dumb but wanted my 10 bucks, or maybe I just don't get it???????

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=354

**dirk digler** · 04-10-2008, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ill-Logical

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=354

Ahh thanks.

I guess Rad doesn't like how America works maybe he can move to China I hear the weather is good there

BTW I voted yes because I have balls of steel

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 04-10-2008, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

Ahh thanks.

I guess Rad doesn't like how America works maybe he can move to China I hear the weather is good there

Rad is right.

**dirk digler** · 04-10-2008, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Flopnuts

Rad is right.

I stated in that thread multiple times I could care less either way but I don't get why people are getting so upset about democracy in action. IMHO they are just mad it is against them this time.

Just like in my town on Tuesday, they had a vote to build a couple of new buildings and it was going to raise everyone's property tax and it passed. I voted no but hey that is the system at work.

**Bugeater** · 04-10-2008, 09:50 PM

I'm guessing there is some kind of back story to this. I suppose I'll trudge on over to DC and try to figure out what it is.

Logical · 04-10-2008, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoBo

I'm guessing there is some kind of back story to this. I suppose I'll trudge on over to DC and try to figure out what it is.

Inspiration
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=354

**dirk digler** · 04-10-2008, 10:00 PM

I don't get it

**Bugeater** · 04-10-2008, 10:10 PM

I agree with rad wholeheartedly, but I'm also resigned to the fact that it's a losing battle.

smittysbar · 04-10-2008, 10:51 PM

Funny how people on here say it won't hurt the bars, but yet they are trying to get it changed....hmmm. Wonder why? Because some of you don't have a ****ing clue, they ARE losing money. Bar owners in Columbia are trying the same thing, because they ARE losing money. Bar owners in Kirksville are trying to get it changed also, because the ARE losing money. I can't complain, at the moment because the ban is making me money (people are coming to my place because they can smoke if they want).

We as bar owners spend a ton of money on smoke eaters, special filters, and exhaust fans to accommodate both sides. Jesus, reading the dumb shit posts on this board about the subject is almost laughable. You would think that if you were to go to a bar that allows smoking you would drop dead the following night.

I have a guy that comes into the bar probably 3 to 5 times a week. Has an occasional cig when he is drinking. Plays golf with us everyday. Works at a local auction house. Seems to always be doing something. Oh and did I mention he is 85 years old. Yes smoking is not healthy, but come on, you going to a bar were others are smoking is not going to kill you. If you don't think the owner is doing enough to control the smoke, FIND ANOTHER PLACE TO GO.

By the way, even though it has helped my business, with the smoking ban passing just up the road. I am still against it! Whats next? How are they going to hurt our businesses in the future? Is it your family that is getting their income cut? Is it really that big of a deal to you? If it's such a great idea, why don't some of you get together and build a bar in a town that doesn't have the ban, but make yours non-smoking............since it is such a good idea, you ought to rake in the money, right? WRONG, or bars would have already been non-smoking, and they wouldn't have to make chicken shit laws, such as this.

04-10-2008, 11:01 PM

I like you smitty. I hope you make a billion dollars selling beers at 300% margin. But I don't give a rip about bar owners. I don't give a rip about R.J. Reynolds either. If a law is passed that hurts the profitability of cancer sticks, I just can't complain. I'm a former tobacco user (spitter, not a sucker) and I don't like to smell like an ashtray. I'm watching my wife's grandmother die a painful death from second hand smoke, so I don't care about scientific studies or what the CDC says about 2nd-hand-smoke. My experience tells me it can kill you.

I have plenty of friends who smoke. Great. I don't have a problem with their choice. I don't care about a lot of stuff. But don't ask me to feel sorry for bar owners when smoking is pushed outside. People will still come. They'll just go outside to smoke.

View Poll Results: Vote in the Dirk Digler poll (read thread header first)
Yes, a lottery winner should be able to kick him in the balls	31	56.36%
No, a lottery winner shouldn't be able to kick him in the balls	7	12.73%
I am morally opposed to lotteries	17	30.91%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

04-10-2008, 08:47 PM	Topic Starter
Logical Screw U if U can't take a joke Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Dirk Digler vote (just curious) Random Lottery Lets all vote on a measure that would require Dirk Digler to stand in front of KFC on the 2nd Tuesday of each month and a random lottery winner would have to kick him in the balls. Would it pass?
Posts: 31,579

04-10-2008, 08:52 PM	#2
KCChiefsMan AIC Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: West Roxbury, MA Casino cash: $10004900	isn't Dirk Digler a fictional character?
Posts: 11,478

04-10-2008, 09:25 PM	#3
Logical Screw U if U can't take a joke Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	What no moral opposition to lotteries?
Posts: 31,579

04-10-2008, 09:49 PM	#5
smittysbar Right in the Lumberyard Danny Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: LaPlata, MO Casino cash: $10004942	Thought the poll was dumb but wanted my 10 bucks, or maybe I just don't get it??????? __________________
Posts: 6,646

04-10-2008, 09:50 PM	#10
Bugeater The Maintenance Guy Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Renovated Bugeater Estate Casino cash: $3992680	I'm guessing there is some kind of back story to this. I suppose I'll trudge on over to DC and try to figure out what it is.
Posts: 70,546

04-10-2008, 10:00 PM	#12
dirk digler Please squeeze Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Clinton, MO Casino cash: $124644	I don't get it
Posts: 67,116

04-10-2008, 10:10 PM	#13
Bugeater The Maintenance Guy Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Renovated Bugeater Estate Casino cash: $3992680	I agree with rad wholeheartedly, but I'm also resigned to the fact that it's a losing battle.
Posts: 70,546

04-10-2008, 10:51 PM	#14
smittysbar Right in the Lumberyard Danny Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: LaPlata, MO Casino cash: $10004942	Funny how people on here say it won't hurt the bars, but yet they are trying to get it changed....hmmm. Wonder why? Because some of you don't have a ****ing clue, they ARE losing money. Bar owners in Columbia are trying the same thing, because they ARE losing money. Bar owners in Kirksville are trying to get it changed also, because the ARE losing money. I can't complain, at the moment because the ban is making me money (people are coming to my place because they can smoke if they want). We as bar owners spend a ton of money on smoke eaters, special filters, and exhaust fans to accommodate both sides. Jesus, reading the dumb shit posts on this board about the subject is almost laughable. You would think that if you were to go to a bar that allows smoking you would drop dead the following night. I have a guy that comes into the bar probably 3 to 5 times a week. Has an occasional cig when he is drinking. Plays golf with us everyday. Works at a local auction house. Seems to always be doing something. Oh and did I mention he is 85 years old. Yes smoking is not healthy, but come on, you going to a bar were others are smoking is not going to kill you. If you don't think the owner is doing enough to control the smoke, FIND ANOTHER PLACE TO GO. By the way, even though it has helped my business, with the smoking ban passing just up the road. I am still against it! Whats next? How are they going to hurt our businesses in the future? Is it your family that is getting their income cut? Is it really that big of a deal to you? If it's such a great idea, why don't some of you get together and build a bar in a town that doesn't have the ban, but make yours non-smoking............since it is such a good idea, you ought to rake in the money, right? WRONG, or bars would have already been non-smoking, and they wouldn't have to make chicken shit laws, such as this.
Posts: 6,646

04-10-2008, 11:01 PM	#15
Phobia Guest Casino cash: $	I like you smitty. I hope you make a billion dollars selling beers at 300% margin. But I don't give a rip about bar owners. I don't give a rip about R.J. Reynolds either. If a law is passed that hurts the profitability of cancer sticks, I just can't complain. I'm a former tobacco user (spitter, not a sucker) and I don't like to smell like an ashtray. I'm watching my wife's grandmother die a painful death from second hand smoke, so I don't care about scientific studies or what the CDC says about 2nd-hand-smoke. My experience tells me it can kill you. I have plenty of friends who smoke. Great. I don't have a problem with their choice. I don't care about a lot of stuff. But don't ask me to feel sorry for bar owners when smoking is pushed outside. People will still come. They'll just go outside to smoke.
Posts: n/a