Football The Footage the NFL Won't Show You: All 22

Deberg_1990 · 11-09-2011, 11:13 AM

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...150731054.html

Every play during an NFL game is filmed from multiple angles in high definition. There are cameras hovering over the field, cameras lashed to the goalposts and cameras pointed at the coaches, who have to cover their mouths to call plays.

But for all the footage available, and despite the $4 billion or so the NFL makes every year by selling its broadcast rights, there's some footage the league keeps hidden.

Every play during an NFL game is filmed from multiple angles in high definition. There are cameras hovering over the field, cameras lashed to the goalposts and cameras pointed at the coaches, who have to cover their mouths to call plays.

But for all the footage available, and despite the $4 billion or so the NFL makes every year by selling its broadcast rights, there's some footage the league keeps hidden.

If you ask the league to see the footage that was taken from on high to show the entire field and what all 22 players did on every play, the response will be emphatic. "NO ONE gets that," NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy wrote in an email. This footage, added fellow league spokesman Greg Aiello, "is regarded at this point as proprietary NFL coaching information."

For decades, NFL TV broadcasts have relied most heavily on one view: the shot from a sideline camera that follows the progress of the ball. Anyone who wants to analyze the game, however, prefers to see the pulled-back camera angle known as the "All 22."

While this shot makes the players look like stick figures, it allows students of the game to see things that are invisible to TV watchers: like what routes the receivers ran, how the defense aligned itself and who made blocks past the line of scrimmage.

By distributing this footage only to NFL teams, and rationing it out carefully to its TV partners and on its web site, the NFL has created a paradox. The most-watched sport in the U.S. is also arguably the least understood. "I don't think you can get a full understanding without watching the entirety of the game," says former head coach Bill Parcells. The zoomed-in footage on TV broadcasts, he says, only shows a "fragment" of what happens on the field.

For much of the NFL's history, seeing only part of the field wasn't a big problem. Passing wasn't as common, or complex, as it is today.

The NFL's creative geniuses were focused on the ground game and the lively run-blocking schemes that came with it. But as NFL offenses began passing more and sending more players into passing routes, they began stretching out the area in which plays are executed—making the All-22 footage more valuable. By the 1980s, when San Francisco's Bill Walsh began to perfect his pass-intensive West Coast offense, a scheme that involved moving the ball with quick, methodical throws, more of the game began to disappear beyond the edge of the television screen. Today's offenses, which routinely use four or even the maximum five receivers, have all but outgrown the traditional zoomed-in view.

Without the expanded frame, fans often have no idea why many plays turn out the way they do, or if the TV analysts are giving them correct information. On a recent Sunday, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Alex Smith threw a deep pass to tight end Delanie Walker for a 26-yard touchdown. Daryl Johnston, the Fox color man working the game, said Smith's throw was "placed perfectly" and that Tampa Bay Buccaneers safety Corey Lynch was "a little bit late getting there."

Greg Cosell, producer of the ESPN program "NFL Matchup," who is one of the few people with access to All-22 footage, said the 49ers had purposely overloaded the right side of the field so each receiver would only be covered by one defender. Lynch, the safety, wasn't late getting there, Cosell says. He was doing his job and covering somebody else. Johnston could not be reached for comment.

Frank Hawkins, a former NFL executive during the 1990s who is now a Scalar Media Partners consultant, says he remembers the NFL considering releasing the All 22. The biggest objection, he said, came from the football people.

Charley Casserly, a former general manager who was a member of the NFL's competition committee, says he voted against releasing All-22 footage because he worried that if fans had access, it would open players and teams up to a level of criticism far beyond the current hum of talk radio. Casserly believed fans would jump to conclusions after watching one or two games in the All 22, without knowing the full story.

"I was concerned about misinformation being spread about players and coaches and their ability to do their job," he said. "It becomes a distraction that you have to deal with." Now an analyst for CBS, Casserly takes an hour-and-a-half train once a week to NFL Films headquarters in Mt. Laurel, N.J. just to watch the All-22 film.

Lonnie Marts, a former linebacker for the Jacksonville Jaguars, says there are thousands of former NFL players who could easily pick apart play-calling and player performance if they had access to this film. "If you knew the game, you'd know that sometimes there's a lot of bonehead plays and bonehead coaching going on out there," he says.

After he retired, Marts says he wanted to talk about the Jaguars on a radio show, so he contacted the video guy from the Jaguars—who was a friend—and asked for a couple of game tapes. Marts says he never heard from the guy again.

The NFL makes a handful of plays from the All 22 available on its web site for a fee, but they're often so blurry the players' numbers aren't visible. Earlier this month, the league quietly asked fans, through a survey site, whether they would pay up to $100 to watch an online feed of the All 22.

News of the survey made its way to NFL message boards and fan sites, where the response among football obsessives was wildly positive. "Yes! Yes! Yes!" said one message-board post. Another said, "The All-22 tape would be amazing. We'd actually be able to see what the safeties are doing."

On a Buffalo Bills fan site called "The Buffalo Range," one message-board member said "I've been dying for them to release it for years. Please help me stuff the ballot box."

The NFL says the league wasn't actually serious about releasing the footage. The survey was meant only to gauge fan interest, Aiello says. "There's not a product in development," he says. "This is a long way from becoming a reality, if ever."

Frosty · 11-09-2011, 11:18 AM

I think we would really hate Cassel if we could see the All 22 footage.

MoreLemonPledge · 11-09-2011, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty

I think we would really hate our safeties even more if we could see the All 22 footage.

FYP

Frosty · 11-09-2011, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoreLemonPledge

FYP

That too.

milkman · 11-09-2011, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoreLemonPledge

FYP

No, he had it right to begin with.

We aren't stuck with these safeties.

We are stuck with Cassel.

lcarus · 11-09-2011, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

No, he had it right to begin with.

We aren't stuck with these safeties.

We are stuck with Cassel.

Not only that, you can work around bad safeties. Can't work around a bad QB.

11-09-2011, 11:36 AM

The NFL continues to frustrate me. This is just one of the many things.

FAX · 11-09-2011, 11:46 AM

VeeGer demands the information.

FAX

Nightfyre · 11-09-2011, 11:47 AM

I want the footage. Now.

Reerun_KC · 11-09-2011, 11:48 AM

"I don't think you can get a full understanding without watching the entirety of the game," says former head coach Bill Parcells. The zoomed-in footage on TV broadcasts, he says, only shows a "fragment" of what happens on the field.

I find this as bullshit.. There are plenty of guys here that know the game based off the TV "game tape" along with every assignment and play.

Parcells is full of shit and guys like Hamas and OTWP would ****ing own him in footbal related issues...

**The Franchise** · 11-09-2011, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

"I don't think you can get a full understanding without watching the entirety of the game," says former head coach Bill Parcells. The zoomed-in footage on TV broadcasts, he says, only shows a "fragment" of what happens on the field.

I find this as bullshit.. There are plenty of guys here that know the game based off the TV "game tape" along with every assignment and play.

Parcells is full of shit and guys like Hamas and OTWP would ****ing own him in footbal related issues...

U MAD BRO!?

Reerun_KC · 11-09-2011, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

U MAD BRO!?

Nope not at all..

Actually pretty chilled today... Getting ready for a 3-4 day weekend starting tomorrow.

All is well in the heartland...

Well except the damn earthquakes keep knocking shit over around the house...

Oh Snap · 11-09-2011, 03:54 PM

what if 22 fans in collaboration with one another, went in and recorded the entire game from 22 different angels? What then?

I have a conspiracy as to why they dont want this in everyones hands (especially the teams). What if they are only allowing a certain set of teams (the modern day "dynasties") these tapes from 22 different angels? Obviously having dynasties makes the game a bit more interesting from a story stand point. Also, some certain people might benefit greatly via financially by having certain teams win more than others. I know i'm probably wrong, but it makes ya wonder why these teams have been so good for so long. Obviously they would still need to have playmakers to make it work. But it is an added advantage that these certain teams would have that others wouldnt.

nstygma · 11-09-2011, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oh Snap

what if 22 fans in collaboration with one another, went in and recorded the entire game from 22 different angels? What then?

I have a conspiracy as to why they dont want this in everyones hands (especially the teams). What if they are only allowing a certain set of teams (the modern day "dynasties") these tapes from 22 different angels? Obviously having dynasties makes the game a bit more interesting from a story stand point. Also, some certain people might benefit greatly via financially by having certain teams win more than others. I know i'm probably wrong, but it makes ya wonder why these teams have been so good for so long. Obviously they would still need to have playmakers to make it work. But it is an added advantage that these certain teams would have that others wouldnt.

i think all the teams get this footage. just not all the media and the public. a more plausible reason why there are dynasties, is because of the work of the clandestine underground midgets

Hydrae · 11-09-2011, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oh Snap

what if 22 fans in collaboration with one another, went in and recorded the entire game from 22 different angels? What then?

I have a conspiracy as to why they dont want this in everyones hands (especially the teams). What if they are only allowing a certain set of teams (the modern day "dynasties") these tapes from 22 different angels? Obviously having dynasties makes the game a bit more interesting from a story stand point. Also, some certain people might benefit greatly via financially by having certain teams win more than others. I know i'm probably wrong, but it makes ya wonder why these teams have been so good for so long. Obviously they would still need to have playmakers to make it work. But it is an added advantage that these certain teams would have that others wouldnt.

Heaven's to Betsy, I don't think angels have anything to do with football.

11-09-2011, 11:13 AM	Topic Starter
Deberg_1990 In Search of a Life Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio Tx. Casino cash: $104454	The Footage the NFL Won't Show You: All 22 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...150731054.html Every play during an NFL game is filmed from multiple angles in high definition. There are cameras hovering over the field, cameras lashed to the goalposts and cameras pointed at the coaches, who have to cover their mouths to call plays. But for all the footage available, and despite the $4 billion or so the NFL makes every year by selling its broadcast rights, there's some footage the league keeps hidden. Every play during an NFL game is filmed from multiple angles in high definition. There are cameras hovering over the field, cameras lashed to the goalposts and cameras pointed at the coaches, who have to cover their mouths to call plays. But for all the footage available, and despite the $4 billion or so the NFL makes every year by selling its broadcast rights, there's some footage the league keeps hidden. If you ask the league to see the footage that was taken from on high to show the entire field and what all 22 players did on every play, the response will be emphatic. "NO ONE gets that," NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy wrote in an email. This footage, added fellow league spokesman Greg Aiello, "is regarded at this point as proprietary NFL coaching information." For decades, NFL TV broadcasts have relied most heavily on one view: the shot from a sideline camera that follows the progress of the ball. Anyone who wants to analyze the game, however, prefers to see the pulled-back camera angle known as the "All 22." While this shot makes the players look like stick figures, it allows students of the game to see things that are invisible to TV watchers: like what routes the receivers ran, how the defense aligned itself and who made blocks past the line of scrimmage. By distributing this footage only to NFL teams, and rationing it out carefully to its TV partners and on its web site, the NFL has created a paradox. The most-watched sport in the U.S. is also arguably the least understood. "I don't think you can get a full understanding without watching the entirety of the game," says former head coach Bill Parcells. The zoomed-in footage on TV broadcasts, he says, only shows a "fragment" of what happens on the field. For much of the NFL's history, seeing only part of the field wasn't a big problem. Passing wasn't as common, or complex, as it is today. The NFL's creative geniuses were focused on the ground game and the lively run-blocking schemes that came with it. But as NFL offenses began passing more and sending more players into passing routes, they began stretching out the area in which plays are executed—making the All-22 footage more valuable. By the 1980s, when San Francisco's Bill Walsh began to perfect his pass-intensive West Coast offense, a scheme that involved moving the ball with quick, methodical throws, more of the game began to disappear beyond the edge of the television screen. Today's offenses, which routinely use four or even the maximum five receivers, have all but outgrown the traditional zoomed-in view. Without the expanded frame, fans often have no idea why many plays turn out the way they do, or if the TV analysts are giving them correct information. On a recent Sunday, San Francisco 49ers quarterback Alex Smith threw a deep pass to tight end Delanie Walker for a 26-yard touchdown. Daryl Johnston, the Fox color man working the game, said Smith's throw was "placed perfectly" and that Tampa Bay Buccaneers safety Corey Lynch was "a little bit late getting there." Greg Cosell, producer of the ESPN program "NFL Matchup," who is one of the few people with access to All-22 footage, said the 49ers had purposely overloaded the right side of the field so each receiver would only be covered by one defender. Lynch, the safety, wasn't late getting there, Cosell says. He was doing his job and covering somebody else. Johnston could not be reached for comment. Frank Hawkins, a former NFL executive during the 1990s who is now a Scalar Media Partners consultant, says he remembers the NFL considering releasing the All 22. The biggest objection, he said, came from the football people. Charley Casserly, a former general manager who was a member of the NFL's competition committee, says he voted against releasing All-22 footage because he worried that if fans had access, it would open players and teams up to a level of criticism far beyond the current hum of talk radio. Casserly believed fans would jump to conclusions after watching one or two games in the All 22, without knowing the full story. "I was concerned about misinformation being spread about players and coaches and their ability to do their job," he said. "It becomes a distraction that you have to deal with." Now an analyst for CBS, Casserly takes an hour-and-a-half train once a week to NFL Films headquarters in Mt. Laurel, N.J. just to watch the All-22 film. Lonnie Marts, a former linebacker for the Jacksonville Jaguars, says there are thousands of former NFL players who could easily pick apart play-calling and player performance if they had access to this film. "If you knew the game, you'd know that sometimes there's a lot of bonehead plays and bonehead coaching going on out there," he says. After he retired, Marts says he wanted to talk about the Jaguars on a radio show, so he contacted the video guy from the Jaguars—who was a friend—and asked for a couple of game tapes. Marts says he never heard from the guy again. The NFL makes a handful of plays from the All 22 available on its web site for a fee, but they're often so blurry the players' numbers aren't visible. Earlier this month, the league quietly asked fans, through a survey site, whether they would pay up to $100 to watch an online feed of the All 22. News of the survey made its way to NFL message boards and fan sites, where the response among football obsessives was wildly positive. "Yes! Yes! Yes!" said one message-board post. Another said, "The All-22 tape would be amazing. We'd actually be able to see what the safeties are doing." On a Buffalo Bills fan site called "The Buffalo Range," one message-board member said "I've been dying for them to release it for years. Please help me stuff the ballot box." The NFL says the league wasn't actually serious about releasing the footage. The survey was meant only to gauge fan interest, Aiello says. "There's not a product in development," he says. "This is a long way from becoming a reality, if ever."
Posts: 68,675

11-09-2011, 11:18 AM	#2
Frosty Go Beavers! Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Washington Casino cash: $3358243	I think we would really hate Cassel if we could see the All 22 footage.
Posts: 14,541

11-09-2011, 11:36 AM	#7
Phobia Guest Casino cash: $	The NFL continues to frustrate me. This is just one of the many things.
Posts: n/a

11-09-2011, 11:46 AM	#8
FAX testing ... 1, 2, 3 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Tennessee Casino cash: $6753759	VeeGer demands the information. FAX
Posts: 44,492

11-09-2011, 11:47 AM	#9
Nightfyre MVP Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Helena, MT Casino cash: $1298849	I want the footage. Now.
Posts: 18,647

11-09-2011, 11:48 AM	#10
Reerun_KC Banned Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $7231160	"I don't think you can get a full understanding without watching the entirety of the game," says former head coach Bill Parcells. The zoomed-in footage on TV broadcasts, he says, only shows a "fragment" of what happens on the field. I find this as bullshit.. There are plenty of guys here that know the game based off the TV "game tape" along with every assignment and play. Parcells is full of shit and guys like Hamas and OTWP would ****ing own him in footbal related issues...
Posts: 1,529

11-09-2011, 03:54 PM	#13
Oh Snap Veteran Join Date: Nov 2005 Casino cash: $8934925	what if 22 fans in collaboration with one another, went in and recorded the entire game from 22 different angels? What then? I have a conspiracy as to why they dont want this in everyones hands (especially the teams). What if they are only allowing a certain set of teams (the modern day "dynasties") these tapes from 22 different angels? Obviously having dynasties makes the game a bit more interesting from a story stand point. Also, some certain people might benefit greatly via financially by having certain teams win more than others. I know i'm probably wrong, but it makes ya wonder why these teams have been so good for so long. Obviously they would still need to have playmakers to make it work. But it is an added advantage that these certain teams would have that others wouldnt.
Posts: 2,025