|
|
12-01-2011, 10:12 PM | Topic Starter |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $1544064
|
2012 Season
Say the Chiefs go on to lose out which is very much a possibilty. Finish the season with a top 7 pick and select Matt Barkley from USC to play QB.
Do you start him right away? If so, what kind of expectations should we have next year? Now say the Chiefs were to pick RGIII instead. What would you do with him in reference to the above questions? Discuss. |
Posts: 82,314
|
12-01-2011, 10:13 PM | #2 |
Sarcasm
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Olathe
Casino cash: $4552900
|
Start either one right away from day 1.
I'd still expect 10-6 next year IF this QB we take is actually worth a crap. If we had Luck we'd go 11-5. Guaranteed. |
Posts: 21,146
|
12-01-2011, 10:14 PM | #3 |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $875208
|
|
Posts: 91,832
|
12-01-2011, 10:16 PM | #4 |
Mod Team
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Valley of the hot as ****
Casino cash: $431900
|
Barkley will be much more ready to play and could start if he puts in work during the offseason. I feel Barkley will have a decent grasp of a pro offense.
RGIII is more of a project and would take much more time to be ready to play. I wouldn't see him playing in his first season if he was drafted. RGIII has a higher upside or possible peak play but also a greater probability to be a bust. Just my opinion. |
Posts: 46,066
|
12-01-2011, 10:40 PM | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: KC
Casino cash: $9925938
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 3,859
|
12-01-2011, 10:52 PM | #6 | |
Mod Team
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Valley of the hot as ****
Casino cash: $431900
|
Quote:
However, I would rather have RGIII because he brings more excitement and has more of an upside. Barkley is a safer pick but has a lower ceiling. |
|
Posts: 46,066
|
12-01-2011, 10:18 PM | #7 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $1544064
|
I'm starting to lean more towards Barkely for the pro style argument sake. RGIII is a little more of a project.
|
Posts: 82,314
|
12-01-2011, 10:26 PM | #8 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2011
Casino cash: $8901048
|
Barkley will likely be the #2 QB taken, and the odds of us finishing with a higher pick then both the redskins and dolphins isn't too likely. Barkley is the safer bet, but RG3 has a much higher ceiling to me.
|
Posts: 2,496
|
12-01-2011, 10:40 PM | #9 | |
I've Made a Huge Mistake
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NJ
Casino cash: $5680423
|
Quote:
I agree with you though, that odds are we won't have an option. We might be lucky to have either one of them there when we pick. I can see Pioli using the "well if Barkley was there I would have" excuse. |
|
Posts: 12,244
|
12-01-2011, 10:44 PM | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2011
Casino cash: $8901048
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 2,496
|
12-01-2011, 10:45 PM | #11 |
I've Made a Huge Mistake
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: NJ
Casino cash: $5680423
|
I am not sure we win the SOS with anyone.
|
Posts: 12,244
|
12-01-2011, 10:47 PM | #12 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2011
Casino cash: $8901048
|
|
Posts: 2,496
|
12-01-2011, 10:36 PM | #13 |
Keep It on Wax
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BUMP MASTER, USA
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Either Barkley or RG3 you start year two, get rid of Zorn and coach them up. Let's just hope we don't draft a late round project QB from who gives a ****...
__________________
Best QB Available |
Posts: 2,588
|
12-01-2011, 10:38 PM | #14 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $1544064
|
I think Barkley is a day 1 guy.
RGIII maybe year two. I'd also like to keep Zorn around. |
Posts: 82,314
|
12-01-2011, 10:41 PM | #15 |
Keep It on Wax
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BUMP MASTER, USA
Casino cash: $10004900
|
My feeling is the Aaron Rodgers effect of having them sit on the bench for a year or so. I'd love to see them immediately but who knows if they are ready.
__________________
Best QB Available |
Posts: 2,588
|
|
|