Chiefs Conspiracy Theory Re: Jamal only getting 5 touches

**FRCDFED** · 10-30-2012, 07:47 AM

Bear with me for a minute.......I didn't see the game so my opinion is based merely on what I have read in the media specifically on Crennels response to why Jamal was only given 5 carries for the game.

Is it possible that Pioli/Crennel/Daboll attempted to sabotage B. Quinn's first start on the team by inserting a game plan that limited the use of the running game and was designed to force Quinn to pass more than expected?

I mean, wouldn't you break in a new starting QB by using the teams strength (running game) to create opportunities to build confidence and succeed in the passing game? Start off with some runs followed by some play action to keep the defense honest. Then move on to short slants and high percentage throws to build confidence and establish a tempo with the receivers?

So again I ask.....is it possible that the three stooges attempted to put in a game plan to sabotage Quinn but that it backfired only because Quinn went down with and injury and they couldn't change the entire game plan thereby forcing them to roll with what they had?

Just asking.............because that is the ONLY reason I can come up with that you give Jamal ****ING Charles only 5 carries in a ****ING game!!!

**loochy** · 10-30-2012, 07:49 AM

No, it's not possible. They could just start Cassel instead. Also, Quinn needs no help making himself look bad.

Just face it - Crennel and Daboll are idiots. That's all there is to it.

Deberg_1990 · 10-30-2012, 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy

Just face it - Crennel and Daboll are idiots. That's all there is to it.

This. These two clowns are not smart enough to dream something up like this.

kaplin42 · 10-30-2012, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy

No, it's not possible. They could just start Cassel instead. Also, Quinn needs no help making himself look bad.

Just face it - Crennel and Daboll are idiots. That's all there is to it.

This.

/thread

**Easy 6** · 10-30-2012, 10:38 AM

Color me glad they didnt waste Charles any more than they did, let draughn, gray & the White Bus(t) soak up some punishment for a while.

BlackHelicopters · 10-30-2012, 07:49 AM

My theory is Charles is not 100%. Or The trifecta of Pioli/RAC/Daboll is not very smart.

Marcellus · 10-30-2012, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop

My theory is Charles is not 100%. Or The trifecta of Pioli/RAC/Daboll is not very smart.

He sure seemed 100% running it 26 times in the first half against the Ravens.

That leaves.............

**TimeForWasp** · 10-30-2012, 07:53 AM

Charles is the top secret emergency QB. shhhhhhh keep it to yourself.

KC kid · 10-30-2012, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRCDFED

Bear with me for a minute.......I didn't see the game so my opinion is based merely on what I have read in the media specifically on Crennels response to why Jamal was only given 5 carries for the game.

Is it possible that Pioli/Crennel/Daboll attempted to sabotage B. Quinn's first start on the team by inserting a game plan that limited the use of the running game and was designed to force Quinn to pass more than expected?

I mean, wouldn't you break in a new starting QB by using the teams strength (running game) to create opportunities to build confidence and succeed in the passing game? Start off with some runs followed by some play action to keep the defense honest. Then move on to short slants and high percentage throws to build confidence and establish a tempo with the receivers?

So again I ask.....is it possible that the three stooges attempted to put in a game plan to sabotage Quinn but that it backfired only because Quinn went down with and injury and they couldn't change the entire game plan thereby forcing them to roll with what they had?

Just asking.............because that is the ONLY reason I can come up with that you give Jamal ****ING Charles only 5 carries in a ****ING game!!!

I think you could not be more wrong. I think Crennel is definitely in Quinn's corner as Pioli has only recently given him the go ahead on him. If you go back to the Tampa game, the first thing RAC said was IT IS NOT THE QBS fault! He was not asked about quarterback. He offered it up of his own accord. Added to that, he has every excuse to go ahead and name Cassel the starter this week. . . ie Cassel playing well and Quinn being hurt, but he said that Quinn is the guy if he can practice. I think Romeo is all in on Quinn right now

**FRCDFED** · 10-30-2012, 07:53 AM

Good points.

reschief · 10-30-2012, 07:54 AM

That would seem to contradict the "fake head injury" to Quinn theory, unless a) Quinn was in on the deal to put Castle in position to be the QB again or b) Quinn was told, "we can't wait to put our beloved Castle back in the game, even though we set you up for failure anyway, so pretend you're hurt." Either way, the legendary level of fail continues no matter who the QB is or will be this year.

**FRCDFED** · 10-30-2012, 07:55 AM

How in the world do you only give Charles 5 carries is beyond me. Hopefully they don't do something stupid this week and overload him. We need Charles to make it through this season so we will have a stud RB to pair with our shiny new QB next year!

**buddha** · 10-30-2012, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FRCDFED

How in the world do you only give Charles 5 carries is beyond me. Hopefully they don't do something stupid this week and overload him. We need Charles to make it through this season so we will have a stud RB to pair with our shiny new QB next year!

It doesn't make any sense...so the only reason I can come up with is that KC is mailing it in on all levels trying to get the top pick in the draft. At this point, why not do that? We literally have nothing to lose. Better to trade Bowe, draft an elite QB in the first round, and find a GM and coaching staff who know what they are doing.

Personally, I'd pull for Gruden.

**loochy** · 10-30-2012, 07:55 AM

This is kind of like how people think that the U.S. Govt. orchestrated 9/11 attacks. There's NO WAY that an organization as incompetent as that could orchestrate something on that scale.

Molitoth · 10-30-2012, 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loochy

This is kind of like how people think that the U.S. Govt. orchestrated 9/11 attacks. There's NO WAY that an organization as incompetent as that could orchestrate something on that scale.

Yet, a small group of "terrorists" can?

10-30-2012, 07:47 AM	Topic Starter
FRCDFED Line'em up Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: somewhere out there Casino cash: $8966297	Conspiracy Theory Re: Jamal only getting 5 touches Bear with me for a minute.......I didn't see the game so my opinion is based merely on what I have read in the media specifically on Crennels response to why Jamal was only given 5 carries for the game. Is it possible that Pioli/Crennel/Daboll attempted to sabotage B. Quinn's first start on the team by inserting a game plan that limited the use of the running game and was designed to force Quinn to pass more than expected? I mean, wouldn't you break in a new starting QB by using the teams strength (running game) to create opportunities to build confidence and succeed in the passing game? Start off with some runs followed by some play action to keep the defense honest. Then move on to short slants and high percentage throws to build confidence and establish a tempo with the receivers? So again I ask.....is it possible that the three stooges attempted to put in a game plan to sabotage Quinn but that it backfired only because Quinn went down with and injury and they couldn't change the entire game plan thereby forcing them to roll with what they had? Just asking.............because that is the ONLY reason I can come up with that you give Jamal **ING Charles only 5 carries in a **ING game!!!
Posts: 3,200

10-30-2012, 07:49 AM	#2
loochy Hey Loochy, I'm hooome! Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: PooPooKaKaPeePeeShire Casino cash: $-1759603	No, it's not possible. They could just start Cassel instead. Also, Quinn needs no help making himself look bad. Just face it - Crennel and Daboll are idiots. That's all there is to it. __________________ Hey Loochy, I'm hoooome!
Posts: 42,182

10-30-2012, 10:38 AM	#5
Easy 6 pie is never free Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: the drivers seat Casino cash: $-192225	Color me glad they didnt waste Charles any more than they did, let draughn, gray & the White Bus(t) soak up some punishment for a while.
Posts: 98,508

10-30-2012, 07:49 AM	#6
BlackHelicopters Spiraling down the Drain Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Dante's Ninth Circle Casino cash: $-10000	My theory is Charles is not 100%. Or The trifecta of Pioli/RAC/Daboll is not very smart. __________________ "We're both part of the same hypocrisy, Senator, but never think it applies to my family." "Fredo. You are my brother, and I love you. But never take sides against the Family again. Ever." 2019 Adopt a Chief - Travis Kelce #87
Posts: 33,364

10-30-2012, 07:53 AM	#8
TimeForWasp Sprinkle in some Mahomes Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Butte Montana Casino cash: $7658507	Charles is the top secret emergency QB. shhhhhhh keep it to yourself. __________________ Posted via Slingshot using Rocks eBay sniper
Posts: 8,271

10-30-2012, 07:54 AM	#11
reschief Starter Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: kansas Casino cash: $10007299	That would seem to contradict the "fake head injury" to Quinn theory, unless a) Quinn was in on the deal to put Castle in position to be the QB again or b) Quinn was told, "we can't wait to put our beloved Castle back in the game, even though we set you up for failure anyway, so pretend you're hurt." Either way, the legendary level of fail continues no matter who the QB is or will be this year.
Posts: 619

10-30-2012, 07:55 AM	#12
FRCDFED Line'em up Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: somewhere out there Casino cash: $8966297	How in the world do you only give Charles 5 carries is beyond me. Hopefully they don't do something stupid this week and overload him. We need Charles to make it through this season so we will have a stud RB to pair with our shiny new QB next year!
Posts: 3,200