What do the Chiefs do w/ the extra cap space?

[CoMoChief]

The Chiefs supposedly gain about $4-5M in cap space w/ the Justin Houston contract extension.

What do the Chiefs do w/ that extra cap allowance?

[-King-]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

The talent last year was arguably worse than in 2013.

2013 was a very good defense too. Houston and Hali getting injured is what ****ed it up.
Posted via Mobile Device

[milkman]

Really, Eric Berry and Earl Thomas might be illustrations of how coaching affects careers.

Thomas thrives in a scheme that puts him in position to succeed.
Berry excels in a scheme that puts him in position to fail.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by LoneWolf

Football is a team sport. There isn't a player alive or dead that has ever single handedly won a single game.

Game changing players certainly exist.

Just like the QB that has numerous 4th quarter comebacks, there are defensive players that have made plays to win or seal victories multiple times as well.

[mcaj22]

Originally Posted by milkman

Really, Eric Berry and Earl Thomas might be illustrations of how coaching affects careers.

Thomas thrives in a scheme that puts him in position to succeed.
Berry excels in a scheme that puts him in position to fail.

Earl Thomas would have been the best regardless.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by mcaj22

Earl Thomas would have been the best regardless.

Your opinion, which I disagree with, and which can not be proven either way.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Williams

Pretty much this.

And Dane, life happens. If Berry were healthy and playing today, could you not say that the defense is on its way to uber-elite?

Based on last year's performance, I'm not sure that Berry's presence would make a difference.

I also believe that the Chiefs defense is elite, without Berry, and there would be very, very few teams that wouldn't swap for their talent and coaching.

[Cmd'r&Chief]

Spend it on Weed for Dwayne Bowe

[mcaj22]

Originally Posted by milkman

Your opinion, which I disagree with, and which can not be proven either way.

So you think Berry is better than Earl Thomas and Earl Thomas is only good/better because of coaching/scheme?

He was good in college and was a Texas prospect no different than Derrick Johnson or Jamaal Charles. And people think both of those guys are some of the best at their position. If you take off the Chiefs homer glasses, the guy is the better player.

When Earl Thomas first got to Seattle they were TERRIBLE and he carried that crappy defense his rookie season. He was playing next to a washed up Lawyer Milloy, an old Marcus Trufant, a bunch of other nobodies. Lofa Tatupu, Aaron Curry and David Hawthorne were the LBers. Absolute bums.

He was literally the only good player on defense for them that year.

[Dave Lane]

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

Desperately need a legit LT.

Again?

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by milkman

Really, Eric Berry and Earl Thomas might be illustrations of how coaching affects careers.

Thomas thrives in a scheme that puts him in position to succeed.
Berry excels in a scheme that puts him in position to fail.

Yep

[milkman]

Originally Posted by mcaj22

So you think Berry is better than Earl Thomas and Earl Thomas is only good/better because of coaching/scheme?

He was good in college and was a Texas prospect no different than Derrick Johnson or Jamaal Charles. And people think both of those guys are some of the best at their position. If you take off the Chiefs homer glasses, the guy is the better player.

When Earl Thomas first got to Seattle they were TERRIBLE and he carried that crappy defense his rookie season. He was playing next to a washed up Lawyer Milloy, an old Marcus Trufant, a bunch of other nobodies. Lofa Tatupu, Aaron Curry and David Hawthorne were the LBers. Absolute bums.

He was literally the only good player on defense for them that year.

No. I am not saying that Earl Thomas is only good because of coaching scheme.

I am saying that Berry, in a role that allowed him to take advantage of his ability and talent would be viewed as equal, at the least.

I would also say that if their roles were reversed, there is no way that Earl Thomas performs at the evel that Berry has.

[LoneWolf]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Game changing players certainly exist.

Just like the QB that has numerous 4th quarter comebacks, there are defensive players that have made plays to win or seal victories multiple times as well.

Game changing players isn't what you typed.

[mcaj22]

Originally Posted by milkman

No. I am not saying that Earl Thomas is only good because of coaching scheme.

I am saying that Berry, in a role that allowed him to take advantage of his ability and talent would be viewed as equal, at the least.

I would also say that if their roles were reversed, there is no way that Earl Thomas performs at the evel that Berry has.

so you don't think if the Chiefs had Earl Thomas instead of Kendrick Lewis and a Scrub SS alongside him and Seattle at ???? FS + Eric Berry during those crappy Chiefs years that Thomas wouldnt be better?

I still think he would be better even here.

[BossChief]

Eric Berry was a playmaking safety his first 2 years at Tennessee and showed the ability to not only consistently take the ball away, but to also take it to the house on big returns.

He tested off the charts at the combine and earned his draft position by showing he could do everything.

The guy should have been used like Brian Dawkins was in Philly. By utilizing him the way the team has, they minimized his ability to impact the passing game.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by mcaj22

so you don't think if the Chiefs had Earl Thomas instead of Kendrick Lewis and a Scrub SS alongside him and Seattle at ???? FS + Eric Berry during those crappy Chiefs years that Thomas wouldnt be better?

I still think he would be better even here.

No. I'm saying that if you dropped Earl Thomas in the box, he would be a bust.