Football CUTLER TO BEARS! - Page 9

**TinyEvel** · 06:54 PM

Per NFL network.

(FIRST!)

Mecca · 04-02-2009, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

This is all really quick and dirty, but if you assume that one-year-later = a one-round drop in value when it comes to draft choices, I figure the deal netted Denver a chart value of around 1300 for Cutler, plus Orton (who I'd say has very little value at all). That's equivalent to the #10 pick.

Even if you assume that the Bears' first's value next year is roughly equivalent to what it's worth this year, that still only puts the total value at the equivalent of our #3 pick. That's not at all too much for a franchise QB.

It's a great deal for the Bears...people who don't think it is either don't like Cutler because he was on the Broncos or they don't value the QB position at all.

EyePod · 04-02-2009, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Don't worry all the QB's in the draft suck, Chiefsplanet told me so.

Never said that, just said that Mark Sanchez does. And you've been saying all along that Stafford is going to suck.

Quesadilla Joe · 04-02-2009, 03:41 PM

We got ripped the **** off. Denver needed to get a top 10 pick, another 1st round pick, and a pro bowler to make this trade fair.

Beerfund · 04-02-2009, 03:42 PM

To complete the trade, the Broncos had to give back a third-round pick in 2009

Mecca · 04-02-2009, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

I like how every analyst they've talked to on NFLN have said what a great deal this is for the Bears, how it's impossible to overpay for a franchise QB.

Then read the comments here about how the Donks got over on the Bears...

Our fan base is loaded with ****tards who think QB isn't anymore valuable than the Jesus Curry.

EyePod · 04-02-2009, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

It's a great deal for the Bears...people who don't think it is either don't like Cutler because he was on the Broncos or they don't value the QB position at all.

I do agree with you here. Kyle Orton is a big step down from Jay Cutler, so I'm pretty excited that he's going to be in Denver... will it be Simms or Orton... my answer is Who Cares?? They're both worse than Cutler.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 04-02-2009, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

This is all really quick and dirty, but if you assume that one-year-later = a one-round drop in value when it comes to draft choices, I figure the deal netted Denver a chart value of around 1300 for Cutler, plus Orton (who I'd say has very little value at all). That's equivalent to the #10 pick.

Even if you assume that the Bears' first's value next year is roughly equivalent to what it's worth this year, that still only puts the total value at the equivalent of our #3 pick. That's not at all too much for a franchise QB.

FWIW, the 12th and 18th pick is worth 2150.

They could move up to as high as #3.

EDIT: Duh. You mentioned that.

L.A. Chieffan · 04-02-2009, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cutler7624

We got ripped the **** off. Denver needed to get a top 10 pick, another 1st round pick, and a pro bowler to make this trade fair.

nice screenname

Kerberos · 04-02-2009, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles

Going to be strange to see an actual good QB in Chicago after all these years.

I thought they traded for Cutler?

Quote:

Originally Posted by cutler7624

We got ripped the **** off. Denver needed to get a top 10 pick, another 1st round pick, and a pro bowler to make this trade fair.

Whaaa?? This is Jay Cutler not Tom Brady. If you think C-untler is worth all that then pass whatever your smokin.

Gravedigger · 04-02-2009, 03:43 PM

They traded 2009 1st rounder 2010 1st rounder and Kyle Orton for Cutler... Bears got hozed.

Mecca · 04-02-2009, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EyePod

Never said that, just said that Mark Sanchez does. And you've been saying all along that Stafford is going to suck.

I said that really?

That's news to me.

Frazod · 04-02-2009, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A.Chieffan

nice screenname

Mecca · 04-02-2009, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravedigger

They traded 2009 1st rounder 2010 1st rounder and Kyle Orton for Cutler... Bears got hozed.

And they continue to show up...

orange · 04-02-2009, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MediaCenterJunkie

Chiefs should take Sanchez or Stafford if available just to **** w/ the Broncos, and then trade one of their QBs for a first next year.

Yeah... because Cassel who's worth half-a-second at 11-5 is going to be worth a first at 15-17.

EyePod · 04-02-2009, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

I like how every analyst they've talked to on NFLN have said what a great deal this is for the Bears, how it's impossible to overpay for a franchise QB.

Then read the comments here about how the Donks got over on the Bears...

NFLN blows Cutler constantly though. I say that he's more proven than any QB in the draft, and with the right coaching/defense (like the Bears' defense), he can be phenomenal. Still a great trade for the Bears.

04-02-2009, 03:19 PM
TinyEvel Just a li'l Evel Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Bald. Goatee. Jorts. Casino cash: $2229601	CUTLER TO BEARS! Per NFL network. (FIRST!) Last edited by TinyEvel; 04-02-2009 at 06:54 PM..
Posts: 12,324

04-02-2009, 03:41 PM	#123
Quesadilla Joe Abolish The Salary Cap! Join Date: Mar 2008 Casino cash: $3408675	We got ripped the **** off. Denver needed to get a top 10 pick, another 1st round pick, and a pro bowler to make this trade fair.
Posts: 19,907

04-02-2009, 03:42 PM	#124
Beerfund Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Topeka Casino cash: $10004900	To complete the trade, the Broncos had to give back a third-round pick in 2009
Posts: 178

04-02-2009, 03:43 PM	#130
Gravedigger Plays to win the game! Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Lees Summit Casino cash: $6473101	They traded 2009 1st rounder 2010 1st rounder and Kyle Orton for Cutler... Bears got hozed.
Posts: 7,826