Chiefs Three Quarter stats from week 1

keg in kc · 09-19-2009, 10:54 PM

Knew this instinctively, although I hadn't thought about it statistically until I reviewed the gamebook to tally the numbers.

Through 3 quarters, Baltimore held the ball for 31:33. Which is essentially an entire game any other week. Some other 3 quarter stats of note:

Baltimore had 346 yards of total offense
Baltimore had 127 yards rushing
Baltimore had 219 yards passing
Flacco was 21-33 for 223 yards, 2 TD and 1 INT

Those wouldn't be embarrassing numbers for four quarters of football. Unfortunately Baltimore had another 8+ minutes to accrue stats.

One more 3 quarter stat, a really, really bad one:

Baltimore was 8-13 on 3rd down (61.5%).
Substat: Baltimore was 6-10 in 3rd and long (5+ yards) (60%).

UsualSuspects · 09-19-2009, 10:55 PM

Yep we suck.

OMG during a rebuild............

chiefbowe82 · 09-19-2009, 10:55 PM

we suck, we know

**DeezNutz** · 09-19-2009, 10:55 PM

But I feel like the defense was improved.

chiefbowe82 · 09-19-2009, 10:56 PM

if we don't get some breaks, they embarrass us and this planet is up in flames. funny how things work

MikeMaslowski · 09-20-2009, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

But I feel like the defense was improved.

sarcasm?

Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan · 09-20-2009, 08:50 AM

Actually, watching the game at the stadium, I felt that the defense was improved.

It felt like they weren't in synch, but I never had the feeling we couldn't make a play like I had much of last season. I was mainly focusing my ire on Leggett.

Flacco had time to find the open receiver, but he was running a lot, making good reads to his drop-off man. While we didn't get a lot of sacks, there was occassional pressure. He just has the wheels to avoid trouble.

Most KC fans didn't take him seriously. I've watched him too many weekends here in Central MD. He's going to be a good QB if they get him a couple more weapons to play with.

**The Bad Guy** · 09-20-2009, 08:54 AM

I think some of it had to do with the fact the offense couldn't sustain a drive. If the offense can't stay on the field, stats like this are going to happen - especially in the 2nd half.

The defense is likely improved simply by subtracting Gunther.

**DeezNutz** · 09-20-2009, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeMaslowski

sarcasm?

Of course.

But as TBG said, ridding ourselves of Gun can be nothing but a step in the right direction.

**ChiefGator** · 09-20-2009, 08:58 AM

I think our defense is improved. We put them into ten third and long plays defensively. But, we kept letting them get them. Our LB's can't cover worth a damn and Leggett was being played too far off the receivers. Our D-Line wasn't as bad as all that, but the QB could count to three and have a wide open receiver every time.

09-19-2009, 10:54 PM
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	Three Quarter stats from week 1 Knew this instinctively, although I hadn't thought about it statistically until I reviewed the gamebook to tally the numbers. Through 3 quarters, Baltimore held the ball for 31:33. Which is essentially an entire game any other week. Some other 3 quarter stats of note: Baltimore had 346 yards of total offense Baltimore had 127 yards rushing Baltimore had 219 yards passing Flacco was 21-33 for 223 yards, 2 TD and 1 INT Those wouldn't be embarrassing numbers for four quarters of football. Unfortunately Baltimore had another 8+ minutes to accrue stats. One more 3 quarter stat, a really, really bad one: Baltimore was 8-13 on 3rd down (61.5%). Substat: Baltimore was 6-10 in 3rd and long (5+ yards) (60%).
Posts: 58,682

09-19-2009, 10:55 PM	#2
UsualSuspects Starter Join Date: Aug 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	Yep we suck. OMG during a rebuild............
Posts: 220

09-19-2009, 10:55 PM	#3
chiefbowe82 Banned Join Date: Aug 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	we suck, we know
Posts: 4,040

09-19-2009, 10:56 PM	#5
chiefbowe82 Banned Join Date: Aug 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	if we don't get some breaks, they embarrass us and this planet is up in flames. funny how things work
Posts: 4,040

09-20-2009, 08:50 AM	#7
Misplaced_Chiefs_Fan I am Number Six Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Columbia, MD, USA Casino cash: $-1470000	Actually, watching the game at the stadium, I felt that the defense was improved. It felt like they weren't in synch, but I never had the feeling we couldn't make a play like I had much of last season. I was mainly focusing my ire on Leggett. Flacco had time to find the open receiver, but he was running a lot, making good reads to his drop-off man. While we didn't get a lot of sacks, there was occassional pressure. He just has the wheels to avoid trouble. Most KC fans didn't take him seriously. I've watched him too many weekends here in Central MD. He's going to be a good QB if they get him a couple more weapons to play with. __________________ One of the lowest PPD of any of the original members of the Planet . . . and proud of it. My web site My writer's page
Posts: 6,717

09-20-2009, 08:54 AM	#8
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9283645	I think some of it had to do with the fact the offense couldn't sustain a drive. If the offense can't stay on the field, stats like this are going to happen - especially in the 2nd half. The defense is likely improved simply by subtracting Gunther. __________________
Posts: 23,216

09-20-2009, 08:58 AM	#10
ChiefGator Can these boys not play? Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Northcentral Florida Casino cash: $6452956	I think our defense is improved. We put them into ten third and long plays defensively. But, we kept letting them get them. Our LB's can't cover worth a damn and Leggett was being played too far off the receivers. Our D-Line wasn't as bad as all that, but the QB could count to three and have a wide open receiver every time. __________________ - Mark
Posts: 4,705