Football Sanchez? - Page 6

Hootie · 10-18-2009, 04:45 PM

Man...sure glad we didn't draft him...he looks terrible.

Hootie · 10-18-2009, 05:19 PM

Maybe Pioli could trade a 7th for Gholston to make Hamas happy...

Would that make you happy little guy?

**doomy3** · 10-18-2009, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Perhaps, but that's the risk any organization, save the Chiefs, must be willing to take.

And Cassel better damn well perform. Thus far, he's been sub-par, at best.

OK, but it's not difficult to figure out why people would be rooting for the guy who the Chiefs passed on to fail. Most on this board are, afterall, fans of the Chiefs.

Pioli Zombie · 10-18-2009, 05:20 PM

He held on to the ball too long!!!! He held on to the ball to long!!!!!!!
Posted via Mobile Device

**mlyonsd** · 10-18-2009, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac

So...

A rookie with 4 OL that were former 1st round picks...a former 1st round pick RB...a former #3 overall WR...all the talent around him in the world...gets a pass...

BUT

Matt Cassel...with the shittiest supporting cast of all time...a guy who hasn't thrown a pick in 4 games...

Can't hold Sanchez' jock?!

Hilarious.

I guess taking Vernon Gholston over Matt Ryan wasn't a fluke for you...

That's reality right there.

Miles · 10-18-2009, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Got Grbac

Maybe Pioli could trade a 7th for Gholston to make Hamas happy...

Would that make you happy little guy?

He was drafted by the Belichick coaching tree so he would likely complain about the lack of variety.

Pioli Zombie · 10-18-2009, 05:21 PM

Third and 24 and he throws for 8!!!! What an ass hole!!!!!!
Posted via Mobile Device

**DeezNutz** · 10-18-2009, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

OK, but it's not difficult to figure out why people would be rooting for the guy who the Chiefs passed on to fail. Most on this board are, afterall, fans of the Chiefs.

For many, I'm guessing that it has far more to do with who wanted the team to select Sanchez.

**doomy3** · 10-18-2009, 05:21 PM

Well, I guess that was a very "Cassel-like" drive for Sanchez. Except for running backwards 14 yards prior to being sacked.

Pablo · 10-18-2009, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doomy3

OK, but it's not difficult to figure out why people would be rooting for the guy who the Chiefs passed on to fail. Most on this board are, afterall, fans of the Chiefs.

Pretty much.

I'm a Chiefs fan. Bottom line. I'm not rooting for Matt Ryan each week. Or Joe Flacco. Or Matt Stafford. Because they don't play for the Chiefs. I'm not going to praise their enormous upside and what they could become; because they don't play for the Chiefs. I don't want them to win any SB's. Because I'd like the Chiefs to win them all, from now until forever.

Some folks are actively rooting for Sanchez...pulling for him to be successful...and WTF for? What good does that do the Chiefs?

chiefzilla1501 · 10-18-2009, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Perhaps, but that's the risk any organization, save the Chiefs, must be willing to take.

And Cassel better damn well perform. Thus far, he's been sub-par, at best.

This is the part I don't understand. Sanchez got a TON of credit for doing some impressive things, but mostly being a little erratic... but he won games. Now that his defense is giving up some scores late in the games, suddenly, the "Sanchez just knows how to win games" argument doesn't apply. Meanwhile, Cassel has done a lot of the same things as Sanchez. He's been largely ineffective most of the game, but in the three games the defense kept the opposing offense honest, Cassel engineered go-ahead drives in each of those games late in the game.

Let's face it. The ONLY reason there was so much Sanchez ball-washing was because he won games. Now that he's not, it's becoming extremely clear that the two are having very similar seasons production-wise.

What is the definition of subpar, really? Because Big Ben's game has always been about managing the game early, letting the defense put them in the position to win games, and then making some big plays late in the 4th quarter. Has Cassel really done anything all that different?

What do we really want out of our QB? The big playmaker or the guy that knows how to close games?

**doomy3** · 10-18-2009, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

For many, I'm guessing that it has far more to do with who wanted the team to select Sanchez.

Well, that would be ridiculous. I don't want Sanchez to be good because that would mean that the Chiefs made a giant mistake. I don't believe they did, just like I didn't believe they did then. If Sanchez does prove to be a great QB though, that will suck, as a fan of this team.

Pioli Zombie · 10-18-2009, 05:23 PM

Takes a sack. Throws for 8 when he needs 24. AND throws for 4 interceptions. I can see why Pioli was such a dummy for passing on such greatness.
Posted via Mobile Device

Pablo · 10-18-2009, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

For many, I'm guessing that it has far more to do with who wanted the team to select Sanchez.

I wanted the team to select Sanchez. I wanted Stafford. We didn't get them. I realized I had to move on.

Am I in love with Cassel? No. Hopefully some day I will be.

Does it do me any good to pine for Sanchez and root for him now that he's a Jet? No.

Mr. Laz · 10-18-2009, 05:24 PM

They don't call him Dirty Sanchez for nuttin

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-18-2009, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie

He hasn't played 5 seasons you dumb mother****er. He had a guy named Tom Brady in front of him for 4 years.
It doesn't change the fact he produced in the NFL and Sanchez hasn't done SHIT.
Posted via Mobile Device

So, during this time he wasn't

1) Studying NFL film
2) Using NFL trainers and facilities?
3) Participating in practice
4) Learning NFL playbooks

Ok.

10-18-2009, 04:45 PM
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	Sanchez? Man...sure glad we didn't draft him...he looks terrible.
Posts: 56,356

10-18-2009, 05:19 PM	#76
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	Maybe Pioli could trade a 7th for Gholston to make Hamas happy... Would that make you happy little guy?
Posts: 56,356

10-18-2009, 05:20 PM	#78
Pioli Zombie Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: olathe,kansas Casino cash: $10004900	He held on to the ball too long!!!! He held on to the ball to long!!!!!!! Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 11,077

10-18-2009, 05:21 PM	#81
Pioli Zombie Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: olathe,kansas Casino cash: $10004900	Third and 24 and he throws for 8!!!! What an ass hole!!!!!! Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 11,077

10-18-2009, 05:21 PM	#83
doomy3 Supporter Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $3153539	Well, I guess that was a very "Cassel-like" drive for Sanchez. Except for running backwards 14 yards prior to being sacked.
Posts: 12,880

10-18-2009, 05:23 PM	#87
Pioli Zombie Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: olathe,kansas Casino cash: $10004900	Takes a sack. Throws for 8 when he needs 24. AND throws for 4 interceptions. I can see why Pioli was such a dummy for passing on such greatness. Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 11,077

10-18-2009, 05:24 PM	#89
Mr. Laz Don't Tease Me Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: KS Casino cash: $11047037	They don't call him Dirty Sanchez for nuttin __________________
Posts: 95,626