just more speculation about RGIII

[tooge]

Well, at least they mention the chiefs


Robert Griffin trade rumors already spinning out of control
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on February 28, 2012, 4:04 PM EST

APForget the Combine. Forget free agency. Robert Griffin III trade chatter dominates the NFL discussion these days.

And it’s still February.

Perhaps Rams COO Kevin Demoff is right: It’s getting less crazy to imagine a deal could be completed before free agency. We’ve read and heard an unprecedented amount of trade rumors about the No. 2 overall pick for this time of year.

Let’s go over the latest:

1. Mike Jones of the Washington Post writes the Redskins would give up the No. 6 overall pick and next year’s first round pick in addition to multiple picks in the mid-to-upper rounds of the draft. Consider this the starting point for negotiations.

The Rams are reportedly looking for a similar package to the one San Diego netted for Eli Manning: Two firsts (including the No. 4 overall pick), a third- and fifth-round pick. The Redskins sound ready to meet this demand.

2. Texas A&M prospect Ryan Tannehill is watching the Griffin talk closely. Jones believes the Redskins would take Tannehill at No. 6 overal if they can’t get Griffin.

3. Terry Pluto of the Cleveland Plain-Dealer believes the Browns will ultimately have to give up three first-round picks in order to land Griffin. Do I hear four, Redskins? (This reminds us of a classic article by the Onion.)

4. Demoff told Peter King of SI.com that the Rams received a feeler from a team “you would never expect.” Does Kansas City count? If not, we’ll roll with Philadelphia as our irresponsible guess for a mystery team. Enter your pick below.

5. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch considers the Redskins the early favorite to land Griffin. This sounds true based on all the reports, plus Mike Shanahan’s close relationship with Jeff Fisher.

[Bane]

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy

They just scored too quickly/ Herm

We played to win too early /herm

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by milkman

Any time Chiefzilla throws in Jimmy Clausen as a potential free agent QB that is better than any of the QBs in this draft after the top 2, he should be laughed at and verbally bitch slapped mercilessly.

You, zilla, are a ****ing moron.

If you're going to invest in a 1st round qb make sure it's the right one. The chiefs can get tannehill or osweiller. Both of them would be tremendous reaches. Outside those 2 guys, clausen has better upside than all of them.

My proposal has always been... Bring clausen in for a year. Aggressively draft a qb in 2013. Neither of are statements that clausen is a franchise qb. It is a statement that clausen is a guy you can being in for nothing that allows you to groom a young qb with upside and still devote 2013 to aggressively draft a qb in the first round.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

The question is and always has been... Could Philip rivers win a super bowl with that supporting cast with Tom coughlin as a coach? Yes I think he could. Coaching is a huge culprit in San Diego's lack of success.

Yes coaching plays a part, idiot, but the fact is that Rivers has been a consistent choker in the biggest moments.

But you're a ****ing idiot, and the obvious is lost on you.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

If you're going to invest in a 1st round qb make sure it's the right one. The chiefs can get tannehill or osweiller. Both of them would be tremendous reaches. Outside those 2 guys, clausen has better upside than all of them.

My proposal has always been... Bring clausen in for a year. Aggressively draft a qb in 2013. Neither of are statements that clausen is a franchise qb. It is a statement that clausen is a guy you can being in for nothing that allows you to groom a young qb with upside and still devote 2013 to aggressively draft a qb in the first round.

I'm not wasting time arguing with you about this.

You're a ****ing idiot.

Your take on Clausen is all anyone needs to see as proof of that fact.

Let me me repeat.

You are a ****ing idiot.

[Epic Fail 007]

I would rather draft Ryan Tannehill than rg3. What you kids don`t understand the street ball style of vick and others like him yes is fun to watch .But in the end that not win you games. Or draft weeden.

[chiefzilla1501]

D

Originally Posted by Sofa King

0 Playoff Wins.

We have zero playoff wins because under vermeil we had a terrific qb but piss poor drafts. We had zero playoff wins under Marty because we had a very good supporting cast but no qb.

Atop acting like the only reason we have struggled is because of the qb. Our problem is that we have never had a good qb and a great draft presence at the same time.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by eric007

I would rather draft Ryan Tannehill than rg3. What you kids don`t understand the street ball style of vick and others like him yes is fun to watch .But in the end that not win you games. Or drat weeden.

Oh Jesus.

[MIAdragon]

Originally Posted by eric007

I would rather draft Ryan Tannehill than rg3. What you kids don`t understand the street ball style of vick and others like him yes is fun to watch .But in the end that not win you games. Or draft weeden.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

We had a franchise qb. Trent green.

No.

[Bane]

Originally Posted by eric007

I would rather draft Ryan Tannehill than rg3. What you kids don`t understand the street ball style of vick and others like him yes is fun to watch .But in the end that not win you games. Or draft weeden.

Yeah drafting like a bunch of scared little bitches (QB wise) has paid off so well for the Chiefs thus far.

[Epic Fail 007]

Originally Posted by milkman

Oh Jesus.

Shake your head all you want its a fact.

[BigCatDaddy]

Originally Posted by eric007

I would rather draft Ryan Tannehill than rg3. What you kids don`t understand the street ball style of vick and others like him yes is fun to watch .But in the end that not win you games. Or draft weeden.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by milkman

I'm not wasting time arguing with you about this.

You're a ****ing idiot.

Your take on Clausen is all anyone needs to see as proof of that fact.

Let me me repeat.

You are a ****ing idiot.

Your take is that a highly touted prospects career is over because he failed in a few games as a rookie under shitty circumstances. I'm advocating clausen as a throwaway option because we can get him for cheap and this qb class sucks.

Stop exaggerating my opinion on clausen. I have never waveredvfrom the opinion that we have to draft a first round qb in the next 3 years. Period.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by eric007

Shake your head all you want its a fact.

Tell us all about the "street ball" that RGIII plays in, you dumbass.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Your take is that a highly touted prospects career is over because he failed in a few games as a rookie under shitty circumstances. I'm advocating clausen as a throwaway option because we can get him for cheap and this qb class sucks.

Stop exaggerating my opinion on clausen. I have never waveredvfrom the opinion that we have to draft a first round qb in the next 3 years. Period.

My take is that you are ****ing moron.

Clausen's circumstances weren't the reason he sucked so hard and showed abssolutely nothing.

Even in the worst of situations, kids with talent show flashes.

He sucked, pure and simple.

You are a ****ing moron.