ATTN: Any visitors that are upset about Bradberry's holding penalty and the refs.

[lawrenceRaider]

Originally Posted by Razaele

I thought in real time there's no way that is a catch because he didn't do the 'football move', but it also seemed silly that he could catch the ball clearly and completely and then do nothing and be protected against a fumble. Seemed this is not really the intent of the rule. But as the rule goes it was the right call.



On replay you could see that when he regained control his left foot was still down, so he did get 2 feet.

NFL catch rules are ridiculously stupid and needlessly complicated.